Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The text thread is a window into the administration’s approach to policy issues, but it mostly makes clear that these are stupid, reckless people pursuing stupid, reckless policies.

“The truth is, these are not very bright guys, and things got out of hand.”

+1000

And they fired experienced “bureaucrats” who did know how to carry out the mission.

Because competence might interfere with blind loyalty.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So now the Trump administration officials at the hearings are lying under oath. Claiming no classified info was included on the chat. They are brazen for sure. They need to be prosecuted.

Guess it needs to be leaked.

The leak happened already, the journalist was the recipient of the leak. The information was shared on
non-DoD phones via an app explicitly banned for use by DoD. They are saying that nothing was classified, so he will just be sharing some texts between friends that he was sent.

Cool then why don't they post the entire text chain online? If none of it was classified information then bring the receipts and show everything that was in there....

You idiot, texts have been posted multiple times over but we can't help if you watch only Fox News and they aren't gonna post anything.

No, you are the f-ng idiot. the full text chain with sensitive/presumably classified information has not been shared. The reporter did not share it because it was too sensitive to share. If I am wrong then please post a link to the entire text chain including the part where they discussed the specifics of the military operations. I'll wait...

Welp, since everyone said under oath that it wasn't classified...

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2025/03/signal-group-chat-attack-plans-hegseth-goldberg/682176/

Can someone please gift link to this? Although I will be subscribing to the Atlantic online when I have. Few minutes.

You can’t just randomly butt-dial on Signal. At the very least, this shows that someone in the chat has/had Goldberg in their contacts list.

And if you follow the logic of their latest theory - that Goldberg somehow hacked into the chat - you can bet that China, North Korea, Russia and Iran were in there as well.

Here is the link to today's article as a gift:
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2025/03/signal-group-chat-attack-plans-hegseth-goldberg/682176/?gift=N1PnAPl47a4VjkNpKFFbSo42rb8tUm4ilHWRJG2idoM&utm_source=copy-link&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=share

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:GA Senator Jon Osseff should be on everyone’s radar. He’s got what it takes to run in 2028. Young gun slaughtered them.

Fire them all! Liars! They cannot keep this country safe. That was appalling.

ohmigoodness! hes gotten SO OLD. so yeah should be perfectly poised to be a US president

When is Gabbard supposed to end the warmongering? That was her claim to fame and why she left the Democratic party.

Instead, she’s now participating in warmongering.

Anonymous wrote:How long until Goldberg is in a car accident and his phone gets lost?

I'd put out a statement that I'm in fine health and I'm not contemplating suicide.

I remember when chats like this were comic memes on Facebook.

How long until Goldberg is in a car accident and his phone gets lost?

Anonymous wrote:This happened on purpose to clog the airwaves and distract from other stuff.

Usually their distraction tactics don’t make themselves look bad, at least not on purpose. I think they just messed up or Waltz for some reason wanted it leaked.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The text thread is a window into the administration’s approach to policy issues, but it mostly makes clear that these are stupid, reckless people pursuing stupid, reckless policies.

“The truth is, these are not very bright guys, and things got out of hand.”

+1000

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Goldberg himself said he got a request to connect from Waltz a few days before the chat started. Has anyone discussed this?

Link?

Did the invite acknowledge that it was Goldberg or was it mistaken identity?

DP, but I saw Goldberg talking about this on TikTok. I think it was an interview with NBC.

He discussed it on the Bulwark Podcast too.

Anonymous wrote:This showed me that there is no 4D chess master plan going on. These people don’t know what they are doing.

Agree.

And the problem with installing people with no experience is that you get these false narratives that people then run with.

Like the point that none of our allies could have executed the same attack.

Like not understanding how deeply we rely on intel from our allies to keep our military and country safe.

No one brings that perspective.

This showed me that there is no 4D chess master plan going on. These people don’t know what they are doing.

This happened on purpose to clog the airwaves and distract from other stuff.