Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All these people who yawned at a million dying of COVID and think a raped 10 year old should have to carry her rapist's baby are pretending to give a shit about what happened to one woman.

Young women attending college shouldn’t end up dead in the woods with a disfigured skull.

Covid was a disease that no one could stop. The 10 year old’s mother was allowing her boyfriend and other adult males rape her child. Both very tragic circumstances.

But American women should be able to go for a run around their college campus without being killed by a man who SHOULD NOT EVEN BE IN OUR COUNTRY.

But, but, but!!! Special pleading. Ignoring all these other deaths for ... reasons, and then pretending to care about this specific tragedy out of ghoulish political expediency.

The person that killed this woman was not supposed to be in the United States. It is illegal for him to be in our country.

It’s ghoulish to allow people in our country that should not be here. They are killing our citizens. There is no reason for this woman to have been murdered. She’s dead because Biden is letting everyone come in.

You are neither truthful with yourself or rational, not about immigrants and not about immigration. Far more American citizens are killing American citizens. Especially with our lax gun laws. You are brainwashed. People like YOU are why this country is going down the toilet.

Your solution is to let more killers in.

No. I would like immigration reform. I just don't demonize and dehumanize immigrants, because I'm not a completely morally bankrupt, lying a-hole who has no common sense and no compassion. Like you and all the other PPs on here making stuff up about illegal immigrants.

This act is a common sense and bipartisan reform that doesn’t demonize or dehumanize immigrants.

The GOP has NO INTEREST in actually participating in legislation addressing immigration reform. They just want to use the issue to whip their base into a froth. They have no credibility at this point. None. Zero. Nada. No matter what the Dems do, if the GOP thinks reform will help the dems politically, they won't participate. It is better for them politically to keep lying and doing nothing.

So spare me.

+3

To add to that: the GOP doesn’t want to fight cancer, or take care of our veterans or make sure that we have safe drinking water. They’re out of step with America.

Yes, yes, that must be it.

Laken (Lincoln) Riley sends her regards.

Republicans spent the last month of the 2018 election campaigning on the “migrant invasion” and Democrats won by 8.6 pts.

We have had quite a change of events since 2018. Seeing that immigration - specifically ILLEGAL immigration is the #1 issue - and given that Joe seems to be more worried about using the euphemisms created by Democrats than he is about actually taking action to stop the flow - I would say the American people see who to trust when it comes to doing something about border security. And, it sure ain't Joe.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

BREAKING: Joe Biden’s wild economic claims during his State of the Union address were fact-checked six times by The New York Times.

1. “15 million new jobs in just three years — a record,” Biden claimed.
• The Times ruled the claim needed context because the job gains “were beginning to return” before Biden came to office from the huge losses during the pandemic.

2. “My policies have attracted $650 billion in private sector investment, in clean energy, advanced manufacturing, creating tens of thousands of jobs here in America!”
• The Times ruled Biden’s statement lacked context and Biden calculated $650 billion based on “public announcements of investments — not necessarily dollars spent — across industries targeted by Mr. Biden’s legislative accomplishments.”

3. “I am cutting our carbon emissions in half by 2030.”
• The Times determined that Biden’s statement lacked context and Biden confused his goal of cutting emissions in half with what his actual policies would cut.

4. “We’ve already cut the federal deficit over a trillion dollars.”
•The Times ruled Biden’s claim needed context:
Under Mr. Biden’s watch, the federal deficit dropped to $1.4 trillion in fiscal year 2022 from $3.1 trillion in fiscal year 2021 — but much of that reduction was attributed to the expiration of coronavirus relief spending. The deficit then rose in 2023, to about $1.7 trillion. The deficit remains higher than it was before the coronavirus pandemic.

5. “You know, there are 1,000 billionaires in America. You know what the average federal tax is for these billionaires? They are making great sacrifices: 8.2 percent. That’s far less than the vast majority of Americans’ pay.”
•The Times reported Biden’s claim did not “technically” reflect the current tax rate.

6. “Many of my friends on the other side of the aisle want to put Social Security on the chopping block.”
•“Republicans are not currently calling for cuts to Social Security,” the Times said. Former President Trump, in fact, said in 2022 that he would never cut Social Security.

Cute to see the supporters of a pathological liar and convicted rapist suddenly profess concern for accuracy.

I also noted that no links were provided to that supposed fact check.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

BREAKING: Joe Biden’s wild economic claims during his State of the Union address were fact-checked six times by The New York Times.

1. “15 million new jobs in just three years — a record,” Biden claimed.
• The Times ruled the claim needed context because the job gains “were beginning to return” before Biden came to office from the huge losses during the pandemic.

2. “My policies have attracted $650 billion in private sector investment, in clean energy, advanced manufacturing, creating tens of thousands of jobs here in America!”
• The Times ruled Biden’s statement lacked context and Biden calculated $650 billion based on “public announcements of investments — not necessarily dollars spent — across industries targeted by Mr. Biden’s legislative accomplishments.”

3. “I am cutting our carbon emissions in half by 2030.”
• The Times determined that Biden’s statement lacked context and Biden confused his goal of cutting emissions in half with what his actual policies would cut.

4. “We’ve already cut the federal deficit over a trillion dollars.”
•The Times ruled Biden’s claim needed context:
Under Mr. Biden’s watch, the federal deficit dropped to $1.4 trillion in fiscal year 2022 from $3.1 trillion in fiscal year 2021 — but much of that reduction was attributed to the expiration of coronavirus relief spending. The deficit then rose in 2023, to about $1.7 trillion. The deficit remains higher than it was before the coronavirus pandemic.

5. “You know, there are 1,000 billionaires in America. You know what the average federal tax is for these billionaires? They are making great sacrifices: 8.2 percent. That’s far less than the vast majority of Americans’ pay.”
•The Times reported Biden’s claim did not “technically” reflect the current tax rate.

6. “Many of my friends on the other side of the aisle want to put Social Security on the chopping block.”
•“Republicans are not currently calling for cuts to Social Security,” the Times said. Former President Trump, in fact, said in 2022 that he would never cut Social Security.

Cute to see the supporters of a pathological liar and convicted rapist suddenly profess concern for accuracy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All these people who yawned at a million dying of COVID and think a raped 10 year old should have to carry her rapist's baby are pretending to give a shit about what happened to one woman.

Young women attending college shouldn’t end up dead in the woods with a disfigured skull.

Covid was a disease that no one could stop. The 10 year old’s mother was allowing her boyfriend and other adult males rape her child. Both very tragic circumstances.

But American women should be able to go for a run around their college campus without being killed by a man who SHOULD NOT EVEN BE IN OUR COUNTRY.

But, but, but!!! Special pleading. Ignoring all these other deaths for ... reasons, and then pretending to care about this specific tragedy out of ghoulish political expediency.

The person that killed this woman was not supposed to be in the United States. It is illegal for him to be in our country.

It’s ghoulish to allow people in our country that should not be here. They are killing our citizens. There is no reason for this woman to have been murdered. She’s dead because Biden is letting everyone come in.

You are neither truthful with yourself or rational, not about immigrants and not about immigration. Far more American citizens are killing American citizens. Especially with our lax gun laws. You are brainwashed. People like YOU are why this country is going down the toilet.

Your solution is to let more killers in.

No. I would like immigration reform. I just don't demonize and dehumanize immigrants, because I'm not a completely morally bankrupt, lying a-hole who has no common sense and no compassion. Like you and all the other PPs on here making stuff up about illegal immigrants.

This act is a common sense and bipartisan reform that doesn’t demonize or dehumanize immigrants.

The GOP has NO INTEREST in actually participating in legislation addressing immigration reform. They just want to use the issue to whip their base into a froth. They have no credibility at this point. None. Zero. Nada. No matter what the Dems do, if the GOP thinks reform will help the dems politically, they won't participate. It is better for them politically to keep lying and doing nothing.

So spare me.

+3

To add to that: the GOP doesn’t want to fight cancer, or take care of our veterans or make sure that we have safe drinking water. They’re out of step with America.

Yes, yes, that must be it.

Laken (Lincoln) Riley sends her regards.

Republicans spent the last month of the 2018 election campaigning on the “migrant invasion” and Democrats won by 8.6 pts.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All these people who yawned at a million dying of COVID and think a raped 10 year old should have to carry her rapist's baby are pretending to give a shit about what happened to one woman.

Young women attending college shouldn’t end up dead in the woods with a disfigured skull.

Covid was a disease that no one could stop. The 10 year old’s mother was allowing her boyfriend and other adult males rape her child. Both very tragic circumstances.

But American women should be able to go for a run around their college campus without being killed by a man who SHOULD NOT EVEN BE IN OUR COUNTRY.

But, but, but!!! Special pleading. Ignoring all these other deaths for ... reasons, and then pretending to care about this specific tragedy out of ghoulish political expediency.

The person that killed this woman was not supposed to be in the United States. It is illegal for him to be in our country.

It’s ghoulish to allow people in our country that should not be here. They are killing our citizens. There is no reason for this woman to have been murdered. She’s dead because Biden is letting everyone come in.

You are neither truthful with yourself or rational, not about immigrants and not about immigration. Far more American citizens are killing American citizens. Especially with our lax gun laws. You are brainwashed. People like YOU are why this country is going down the toilet.

Your solution is to let more killers in.

No. I would like immigration reform. I just don't demonize and dehumanize immigrants, because I'm not a completely morally bankrupt, lying a-hole who has no common sense and no compassion. Like you and all the other PPs on here making stuff up about illegal immigrants.

This act is a common sense and bipartisan reform that doesn’t demonize or dehumanize immigrants.

The GOP has NO INTEREST in actually participating in legislation addressing immigration reform. They just want to use the issue to whip their base into a froth. They have no credibility at this point. None. Zero. Nada. No matter what the Dems do, if the GOP thinks reform will help the dems politically, they won't participate. It is better for them politically to keep lying and doing nothing.

So spare me.

+3

To add to that: the GOP doesn’t want to fight cancer, or take care of our veterans or make sure that we have safe drinking water. They’re out of step with America.

Yes, yes, that must be it.

Laken (Lincoln) Riley sends her regards.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All these people who yawned at a million dying of COVID and think a raped 10 year old should have to carry her rapist's baby are pretending to give a shit about what happened to one woman.

Young women attending college shouldn’t end up dead in the woods with a disfigured skull.

Covid was a disease that no one could stop. The 10 year old’s mother was allowing her boyfriend and other adult males rape her child. Both very tragic circumstances.

But American women should be able to go for a run around their college campus without being killed by a man who SHOULD NOT EVEN BE IN OUR COUNTRY.

But, but, but!!! Special pleading. Ignoring all these other deaths for ... reasons, and then pretending to care about this specific tragedy out of ghoulish political expediency.

The person that killed this woman was not supposed to be in the United States. It is illegal for him to be in our country.

It’s ghoulish to allow people in our country that should not be here. They are killing our citizens. There is no reason for this woman to have been murdered. She’s dead because Biden is letting everyone come in.

You are neither truthful with yourself or rational, not about immigrants and not about immigration. Far more American citizens are killing American citizens. Especially with our lax gun laws. You are brainwashed. People like YOU are why this country is going down the toilet.

Your solution is to let more killers in.

No. I would like immigration reform. I just don't demonize and dehumanize immigrants, because I'm not a completely morally bankrupt, lying a-hole who has no common sense and no compassion. Like you and all the other PPs on here making stuff up about illegal immigrants.

This act is a common sense and bipartisan reform that doesn’t demonize or dehumanize immigrants.

The GOP has NO INTEREST in actually participating in legislation addressing immigration reform. They just want to use the issue to whip their base into a froth. They have no credibility at this point. None. Zero. Nada. No matter what the Dems do, if the GOP thinks reform will help the dems politically, they won't participate. It is better for them politically to keep lying and doing nothing.

So spare me.

+3

To add to that: the GOP doesn’t want to fight cancer, or take care of our veterans or make sure that we have safe drinking water. They’re out of step with America.

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the pile on Katie Britt has taken SOTU off the front page, but man, Joe Biden hit it out of the ballpark!

I had already planned to volunteer for this election, more because I’m afraid of how a 2nd Trump would send us backwards. Now I’m volunteering because I’m excited we are four more years of Democratic control will take us forward!

#RidenwithBiden

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"The free world deserves better", unless you're a woman who needs a life saving abortion.

Then go get an abortion. Very easy to do in the DMV area.

Not if you live in Texas.

So travel to a state that allows it. Is there some lib law that prevents you from traveling to different states? Doesn’t seem to be stopping New Yorkers from fleeing the insanity, crime, and ultra high taxes of that state. Or just amend the Constitution.

Not everyone can afford to travel or take time off from work.

Sorry not buying that. If you are typing that reply into your smart phone or on a computer then you can afford it. Buses are cheap.

I’m sure this would be your response to yourself if you needed urgent, though routine, surgery but had to travel across 4 states and take 4 days off work to get it because the legislature in your state had voted to ban that procedure. Yes, you’d be totally fine with that inconvenience. Because being forced to travel 500 miles for healthcare owing to your state legislature is no big deal. Even if you have small children you’d need to figure out what to do with and a job that didn’t give you paid sick leave and would fire you for taking off so many days in a row. No big deal.

Urgent, though routine, surgery? Are you a medical professional?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"The free world deserves better", unless you're a woman who needs a life saving abortion.

Then go get an abortion. Very easy to do in the DMV area.

Not if you live in Texas.

So travel to a state that allows it. Is there some lib law that prevents you from traveling to different states? Doesn’t seem to be stopping New Yorkers from fleeing the insanity, crime, and ultra high taxes of that state. Or just amend the Constitution.

Not everyone can afford to travel or take time off from work.

Sorry not buying that. If you are typing that reply into your smart phone or on a computer then you can afford it. Buses are cheap.

I’m sure this would be your response to yourself if you needed urgent, though routine, surgery but had to travel across 4 states and take 4 days off work to get it because the legislature in your state had voted to ban that procedure. Yes, you’d be totally fine with that inconvenience. Because being forced to travel 500 miles for healthcare owing to your state legislature is no big deal. Even if you have small children you’d need to figure out what to do with and a job that didn’t give you paid sick leave and would fire you for taking off so many days in a row. No big deal.

Urgent, though routine, surgery? Are you a medical professional?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"The free world deserves better", unless you're a woman who needs a life saving abortion.

Then go get an abortion. Very easy to do in the DMV area.

Not if you live in Texas.

So travel to a state that allows it. Is there some lib law that prevents you from traveling to different states? Doesn’t seem to be stopping New Yorkers from fleeing the insanity, crime, and ultra high taxes of that state. Or just amend the Constitution.

Not everyone can afford to travel or take time off from work.

Sorry not buying that. If you are typing that reply into your smart phone or on a computer then you can afford it. Buses are cheap.

I’m sure this would be your response to yourself if you needed urgent, though routine, surgery but had to travel across 4 states and take 4 days off work to get it because the legislature in your state had voted to ban that procedure. Yes, you’d be totally fine with that inconvenience. Because being forced to travel 500 miles for healthcare owing to your state legislature is no big deal. Even if you have small children you’d need to figure out what to do with and a job that didn’t give you paid sick leave and would fire you for taking off so many days in a row. No big deal.