Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because the media is too obvious about their extreme bias. I read article after article bashing trump. I’m beginning to get suspicious. These are the same people who have claimed numerous times that Trump would wreck the economy. They claimed Hilary would win in a landslide. I’m a liberal and I’m starting to get annoyed with the liberal coverage. The weekly NYT article about the economy going south. I can’t help but recognize he’s gotten some things done.
+1
Media is doing its job.
Remember how they covered Bill Clinton? It was endlessly negative.
What I remember is eight years of obscene adulation of the Obamas, even when Barack deported millions of immigrants and provoked riot after riot.
Obama and his cronies certainly did provoke endless race riots.
There were no race riots
Oh yeah, there were at least a dozen violent blm riots, leading to hundreds more murders in Baltimore, Ferguson, Detroit....
Stop watching the Australian channel making the Australian a billionaire while you suffer for irreversible brain damage. The Australian, Russian and the traitor are together taking the rubes for a long ride.
You are certifiably crazy if you can't acknowledge even widely reported, obvious facts.
Stop watching whatever it is you are watching -- just my friendly advice.
DP.
WTH is "The Australian Channel?"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because the media is too obvious about their extreme bias. I read article after article bashing trump. I’m beginning to get suspicious. These are the same people who have claimed numerous times that Trump would wreck the economy. They claimed Hilary would win in a landslide. I’m a liberal and I’m starting to get annoyed with the liberal coverage. The weekly NYT article about the economy going south. I can’t help but recognize he’s gotten some things done.
You're no liberal, sweetie. And do you have issue with the media printing what comes out of Trump's mouth verbatim? Maybe ask Trump why he lies so much.
Ok well I didn’t vote for trump and I find calling someone “sweetie” to be extremely condescending. Another point for trump. I’m not talking about articles citing Trump. More like the million articles criticizing him for the UK visit. Overblowing the protests. Only negative coverage about him. It was the same way in Europe. Can’t say I want to vote for trump but I’m sick of the Ds.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because the media is too obvious about their extreme bias. I read article after article bashing trump. I’m beginning to get suspicious. These are the same people who have claimed numerous times that Trump would wreck the economy. They claimed Hilary would win in a landslide. I’m a liberal and I’m starting to get annoyed with the liberal coverage. The weekly NYT article about the economy going south. I can’t help but recognize he’s gotten some things done.
+1
Media is doing its job.
Remember how they covered Bill Clinton? It was endlessly negative.
What I remember is eight years of obscene adulation of the Obamas, even when Barack deported millions of immigrants and provoked riot after riot.
Obama and his cronies certainly did provoke endless race riots.
There were no race riots
Oh yeah, there were at least a dozen violent blm riots, leading to hundreds more murders in Baltimore, Ferguson, Detroit....
Stop watching the Australian channel making the Australian a billionaire while you suffer for irreversible brain damage. The Australian, Russian and the traitor are together taking the rubes for a long ride.
You are certifiably crazy if you can't acknowledge even widely reported, obvious facts.
Stop watching whatever it is you are watching -- just my friendly advice.
Where are the obvious facts that aren't being acknowledged? Certainly not here.
You must be Russian if you don't know about the dozen BLM riots that took place here from 2014 to 2016.
You certainly didn't read any US newspaper or watched any US TV channel.
You must be a racist if you think Obama “provoked” the demonstrations.
YOU are the racist.
Compare how Macron is dealing with the yellow vest protests/ riots in France and how Obama dealt with blm protests/ riots here.
One worked hard to contain them and to channel them and to stop the inadmissible violence. The other justified them and promoted them and attacked the police.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because the media is too obvious about their extreme bias. I read article after article bashing trump. I’m beginning to get suspicious. These are the same people who have claimed numerous times that Trump would wreck the economy. They claimed Hilary would win in a landslide. I’m a liberal and I’m starting to get annoyed with the liberal coverage. The weekly NYT article about the economy going south. I can’t help but recognize he’s gotten some things done.
+1
Media is doing its job.
Remember how they covered Bill Clinton? It was endlessly negative.
What I remember is eight years of obscene adulation of the Obamas, even when Barack deported millions of immigrants and provoked riot after riot.
Obama and his cronies certainly did provoke endless race riots.
There were no race riots
Oh yeah, there were at least a dozen violent blm riots, leading to hundreds more murders in Baltimore, Ferguson, Detroit....
Stop watching the Australian channel making the Australian a billionaire while you suffer for irreversible brain damage. The Australian, Russian and the traitor are together taking the rubes for a long ride.
You are certifiably crazy if you can't acknowledge even widely reported, obvious facts.
Stop watching whatever it is you are watching -- just my friendly advice.
Where are the obvious facts that aren't being acknowledged? Certainly not here.
You must be Russian if you don't know about the dozen BLM riots that took place here from 2014 to 2016.
You certainly didn't read any US newspaper or watched any US TV channel.
You must be a racist if you think Obama “provoked” the demonstrations.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because the media is too obvious about their extreme bias. I read article after article bashing trump. I’m beginning to get suspicious. These are the same people who have claimed numerous times that Trump would wreck the economy. They claimed Hilary would win in a landslide. I’m a liberal and I’m starting to get annoyed with the liberal coverage. The weekly NYT article about the economy going south. I can’t help but recognize he’s gotten some things done.
+1
Media is doing its job.
Remember how they covered Bill Clinton? It was endlessly negative.
What I remember is eight years of obscene adulation of the Obamas, even when Barack deported millions of immigrants and provoked riot after riot.
Obama and his cronies certainly did provoke endless race riots.
There were no race riots
Oh yeah, there were at least a dozen violent blm riots, leading to hundreds more murders in Baltimore, Ferguson, Detroit....
Stop watching the Australian channel making the Australian a billionaire while you suffer for irreversible brain damage. The Australian, Russian and the traitor are together taking the rubes for a long ride.
You are certifiably crazy if you can't acknowledge even widely reported, obvious facts.
Stop watching whatever it is you are watching -- just my friendly advice.
Where are the obvious facts that aren't being acknowledged? Certainly not here.
You must be Russian if you don't know about the dozen BLM riots that took place here from 2014 to 2016.
You certainly didn't read any US newspaper or watched any US TV channel.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because the media is too obvious about their extreme bias. I read article after article bashing trump. I’m beginning to get suspicious. These are the same people who have claimed numerous times that Trump would wreck the economy. They claimed Hilary would win in a landslide. I’m a liberal and I’m starting to get annoyed with the liberal coverage. The weekly NYT article about the economy going south. I can’t help but recognize he’s gotten some things done.
+1
Media is doing its job.
Remember how they covered Bill Clinton? It was endlessly negative.
What I remember is eight years of obscene adulation of the Obamas, even when Barack deported millions of immigrants and provoked riot after riot.
Obama and his cronies certainly did provoke endless race riots.
There were no race riots
Oh yeah, there were at least a dozen violent blm riots, leading to hundreds more murders in Baltimore, Ferguson, Detroit....
Stop watching the Australian channel making the Australian a billionaire while you suffer for irreversible brain damage. The Australian, Russian and the traitor are together taking the rubes for a long ride.
You are certifiably crazy if you can't acknowledge even widely reported, obvious facts.
Stop watching whatever it is you are watching -- just my friendly advice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because the media is too obvious about their extreme bias. I read article after article bashing trump. I’m beginning to get suspicious. These are the same people who have claimed numerous times that Trump would wreck the economy. They claimed Hilary would win in a landslide. I’m a liberal and I’m starting to get annoyed with the liberal coverage. The weekly NYT article about the economy going south. I can’t help but recognize he’s gotten some things done.
+1
Media is doing its job.
Remember how they covered Bill Clinton? It was endlessly negative.
What I remember is eight years of obscene adulation of the Obamas, even when Barack deported millions of immigrants and provoked riot after riot.
Obama and his cronies certainly did provoke endless race riots.
There were no race riots
Oh yeah, there were at least a dozen violent blm riots, leading to hundreds more murders in Baltimore, Ferguson, Detroit....
Stop watching the Australian channel making the Australian a billionaire while you suffer for irreversible brain damage. The Australian, Russian and the traitor are together taking the rubes for a long ride.
You are certifiably crazy if you can't acknowledge even widely reported, obvious facts.
Stop watching whatever it is you are watching -- just my friendly advice.
Where are the obvious facts that aren't being acknowledged? Certainly not here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because the media is too obvious about their extreme bias. I read article after article bashing trump. I’m beginning to get suspicious. These are the same people who have claimed numerous times that Trump would wreck the economy. They claimed Hilary would win in a landslide. I’m a liberal and I’m starting to get annoyed with the liberal coverage. The weekly NYT article about the economy going south. I can’t help but recognize he’s gotten some things done.
+1
Media is doing its job.
Remember how they covered Bill Clinton? It was endlessly negative.
What I remember is eight years of obscene adulation of the Obamas, even when Barack deported millions of immigrants and provoked riot after riot.
Obama and his cronies certainly did provoke endless race riots.
There were no race riots
Oh yeah, there were at least a dozen violent blm riots, leading to hundreds more murders in Baltimore, Ferguson, Detroit....
Stop watching the Australian channel making the Australian a billionaire while you suffer for irreversible brain damage. The Australian, Russian and the traitor are together taking the rubes for a long ride.
You are certifiably crazy if you can't acknowledge even widely reported, obvious facts.
Stop watching whatever it is you are watching -- just my friendly advice.
DP.
WTH is "The Australian Channel?"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because the media is too obvious about their extreme bias. I read article after article bashing trump. I’m beginning to get suspicious. These are the same people who have claimed numerous times that Trump would wreck the economy. They claimed Hilary would win in a landslide. I’m a liberal and I’m starting to get annoyed with the liberal coverage. The weekly NYT article about the economy going south. I can’t help but recognize he’s gotten some things done.
+1
Media is doing its job.
Remember how they covered Bill Clinton? It was endlessly negative.
What I remember is eight years of obscene adulation of the Obamas, even when Barack deported millions of immigrants and provoked riot after riot.
Obama and his cronies certainly did provoke endless race riots.
There were no race riots
Oh yeah, there were at least a dozen violent blm riots, leading to hundreds more murders in Baltimore, Ferguson, Detroit....
Stop watching the Australian channel making the Australian a billionaire while you suffer for irreversible brain damage. The Australian, Russian and the traitor are together taking the rubes for a long ride.
You are certifiably crazy if you can't acknowledge even widely reported, obvious facts.
Stop watching whatever it is you are watching -- just my friendly advice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because the media is too obvious about their extreme bias. I read article after article bashing trump. I’m beginning to get suspicious. These are the same people who have claimed numerous times that Trump would wreck the economy. They claimed Hilary would win in a landslide. I’m a liberal and I’m starting to get annoyed with the liberal coverage. The weekly NYT article about the economy going south. I can’t help but recognize he’s gotten some things done.
+1
Media is doing its job.
Remember how they covered Bill Clinton? It was endlessly negative.
What I remember is eight years of obscene adulation of the Obamas, even when Barack deported millions of immigrants and provoked riot after riot.
Obama and his cronies certainly did provoke endless race riots.
There were no race riots
Oh yeah, there were at least a dozen violent blm riots, leading to hundreds more murders in Baltimore, Ferguson, Detroit....
Stop watching the Australian channel making the Australian a billionaire while you suffer for irreversible brain damage. The Australian, Russian and the traitor are together taking the rubes for a long ride.
You are certifiably crazy if you can't acknowledge even widely reported, obvious facts.
Stop watching whatever it is you are watching -- just my friendly advice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because the media is too obvious about their extreme bias. I read article after article bashing trump. I’m beginning to get suspicious. These are the same people who have claimed numerous times that Trump would wreck the economy. They claimed Hilary would win in a landslide. I’m a liberal and I’m starting to get annoyed with the liberal coverage. The weekly NYT article about the economy going south. I can’t help but recognize he’s gotten some things done.
+1
Media is doing its job.
Remember how they covered Bill Clinton? It was endlessly negative.
What I remember is eight years of obscene adulation of the Obamas, even when Barack deported millions of immigrants and provoked riot after riot.
Obama and his cronies certainly did provoke endless race riots.
There were no race riots
Oh yeah, there were at least a dozen violent blm riots, leading to hundreds more murders in Baltimore, Ferguson, Detroit....
Stop watching the Australian channel making the Australian a billionaire while you suffer for irreversible brain damage. The Australian, Russian and the traitor are together taking the rubes for a long ride.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because the media is too obvious about their extreme bias. I read article after article bashing trump. I’m beginning to get suspicious. These are the same people who have claimed numerous times that Trump would wreck the economy. They claimed Hilary would win in a landslide. I’m a liberal and I’m starting to get annoyed with the liberal coverage. The weekly NYT article about the economy going south. I can’t help but recognize he’s gotten some things done.
+1
Media is doing its job.
Remember how they covered Bill Clinton? It was endlessly negative.
What I remember is eight years of obscene adulation of the Obamas, even when Barack deported millions of immigrants and provoked riot after riot.
Obama and his cronies certainly did provoke endless race riots.
There were no race riots
Oh yeah, there were at least a dozen violent blm riots, leading to hundreds more murders in Baltimore, Ferguson, Detroit....
Stop watching the Australian channel making the Australian a billionaire while you suffer for irreversible brain damage. The Australian, Russian and the traitor are together taking the rubes for a long ride.
Obama and his cronies certainly did provoke endless race riots.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump may not be liked by a lot of people (including me), but he definitely achieved something that most seasoned politicians with more money could not achieve. He also changed the rules of the game. And most of the Democratic candidates (as of today) are clueless about new rules. It is pathetic to see Biden's campaign geared by old rules. He has no idea and totally cannot even comprehend how he should play.
Biden was a Senator for 36 years and VP for 8 years.
He IS the "swamp"!
How in the heck could the Democratic Party make him the front runner? He's the problem, not the solution.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because the media is too obvious about their extreme bias. I read article after article bashing trump. I’m beginning to get suspicious. These are the same people who have claimed numerous times that Trump would wreck the economy. They claimed Hilary would win in a landslide. I’m a liberal and I’m starting to get annoyed with the liberal coverage. The weekly NYT article about the economy going south. I can’t help but recognize he’s gotten some things done.
+1
Media is doing its job.
Remember how they covered Bill Clinton? It was endlessly negative.
What I remember is eight years of obscene adulation of the Obamas, even when Barack deported millions of immigrants and provoked riot after riot.
Obama and his cronies certainly did provoke endless race riots.
There were no race riots
Oh yeah, there were at least a dozen violent blm riots, leading to hundreds more murders in Baltimore, Ferguson, Detroit....