Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Watch the extended video here. Start around 1:40:53

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VH4efIHP2lc&t=6100s

You can see the shooter walk away from the vehicle, pull up his mask, and leaves the scene.

Is that what law enforcement officers do after they shoot someone? He skedaddled before the actual police could arrive.

Good slow motion replays in that link.

Two points it shows: 1. There is clearly visible space between the car and both ice agents legs when the first shot is fired. And 2. The agents left the scene after the shooting.

Yeah. He looked very hale and healthy, swaggering away from the murder. Barely stumbled from being dinged by the vehicle.

And fled the scene. They must have made up the hospital story to give cover to the fact that he left.

The misinformation is the problem, people are believing the narrative that ice have no arrest powers and are just fake police only to take care of immigration. Even this person is spreading misinformation. Ice are federal officers that can arrest and detain people not just for immigration violations.

This is why people are acting wild and crazy , the leaders on the left need to explain that they are law enforcement and have these powers and duties and you can't imepede them

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Watch the extended video here. Start around 1:40:53

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VH4efIHP2lc&t=6100s

You can see the shooter walk away from the vehicle, pull up his mask, and leaves the scene.

Is that what law enforcement officers do after they shoot someone? He skedaddled before the actual police could arrive.

Good slow motion replays in that link.

Two points it shows: 1. There is clearly visible space between the car and both ice agents legs when the first shot is fired. And 2. The agents left the scene after the shooting.

Yeah. He looked very hale and healthy, swaggering away from the murder. Barely stumbled from being dinged by the vehicle.

And fled the scene. They must have made up the hospital story to give cover to the fact that he left.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One key aspect I have not seen discussed here or in the media:

- did the officers show their warrant to anybody there?

Because if they didn’t show a valid warrant then they were breaking the law! Has anyone even asked?

they were not on active patrol...they were heading back to their HQ for a break...so there was no warrant or frankly, any reason for them to stop, at all

So if an off-duty police officer sees you in trouble, they should not stop to help?

If an off-duty police officer sees someone parked in the street illegally, yes, they can stop and investigate. Sure. But if they aren't in a police car with flashing red lights, and they aren't wearing a uniform with ID - you don't have to pull over for them. How do you know they are cops?

She was a part of the protest. She intentionally had her car perpendicular in the road. She knew who they were

And she waved them on to pass her by.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Honestly, it’s not even clear whether these people work for the government at all with the outfits they are wearing. If I were in that situation I would probably think I was being kidnapped by some random thugs.

They are wearing federal police uniforms marked with “police”

Do you know how many federal/military law enforcement agencies there are? Is someone supposed to recognize every single one of them, especially when they're wearing face masks and tactical gear to cover up the uniforms?? Might as well say the Klan was a well organized, uniformed law enforcement agency.

Yeah, no.

F each and every voter who voted for Trump.

Anonymous wrote:Honestly, it’s not even clear whether these people work for the government at all with the outfits they are wearing. If I were in that situation I would probably think I was being kidnapped by some random thugs.

They are wearing federal police uniforms marked with “police”

Honestly, it’s not even clear whether these people work for the government at all with the outfits they are wearing. If I were in that situation I would probably think I was being kidnapped by some random thugs.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One key aspect I have not seen discussed here or in the media:

- did the officers show their warrant to anybody there?

Because if they didn’t show a valid warrant then they were breaking the law! Has anyone even asked?

they were not on active patrol...they were heading back to their HQ for a break...so there was no warrant or frankly, any reason for them to stop, at all

So if an off-duty police officer sees you in trouble, they should not stop to help?

If an off-duty police officer sees someone parked in the street illegally, yes, they can stop and investigate. Sure. But if they aren't in a police car with flashing red lights, and they aren't wearing a uniform with ID - you don't have to pull over for them. How do you know they are cops?

She was a part of the protest. She intentionally had her car perpendicular in the road. She knew who they were

And yet they were still getting by and she was waving them on. Fail. Also watch the video and/or learn what perpendicular means.

Her car was still blocking the flow of traffic.

Yet traffic was flowing by her car. You know what actually stopped the flow of traffic? All of the ICE vehicles AFTER the shooting which kept ambulances from getting to the scene.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One key aspect I have not seen discussed here or in the media:

- did the officers show their warrant to anybody there?

Because if they didn’t show a valid warrant then they were breaking the law! Has anyone even asked?

they were not on active patrol...they were heading back to their HQ for a break...so there was no warrant or frankly, any reason for them to stop, at all

So if an off-duty police officer sees you in trouble, they should not stop to help?

If an off-duty police officer sees someone parked in the street illegally, yes, they can stop and investigate. Sure. But if they aren't in a police car with flashing red lights, and they aren't wearing a uniform with ID - you don't have to pull over for them. How do you know they are cops?

She was a part of the protest. She intentionally had her car perpendicular in the road. She knew who they were

And yet they were still getting by and she was waving them on. Fail. Also watch the video and/or learn what perpendicular means.

Her car was still blocking the flow of traffic.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One key aspect I have not seen discussed here or in the media:

- did the officers show their warrant to anybody there?

Because if they didn’t show a valid warrant then they were breaking the law! Has anyone even asked?

they were not on active patrol...they were heading back to their HQ for a break...so there was no warrant or frankly, any reason for them to stop, at all

So if an off-duty police officer sees you in trouble, they should not stop to help?

If an off-duty police officer sees someone parked in the street illegally, yes, they can stop and investigate. Sure. But if they aren't in a police car with flashing red lights, and they aren't wearing a uniform with ID - you don't have to pull over for them. How do you know they are cops?

She was a part of the protest. She intentionally had her car perpendicular in the road. She knew who they were

And yet they were still getting by and she was waving them on. Fail. Also watch the video and/or learn what perpendicular means.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One key aspect I have not seen discussed here or in the media:

- did the officers show their warrant to anybody there?

Because if they didn’t show a valid warrant then they were breaking the law! Has anyone even asked?

they were not on active patrol...they were heading back to their HQ for a break...so there was no warrant or frankly, any reason for them to stop, at all

So if an off-duty police officer sees you in trouble, they should not stop to help?

If an off-duty police officer sees someone parked in the street illegally, yes, they can stop and investigate. Sure. But if they aren't in a police car with flashing red lights, and they aren't wearing a uniform with ID - you don't have to pull over for them. How do you know they are cops?

She was a part of the protest. She intentionally had her car perpendicular in the road. She knew who they were

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can the shooter be held responsible by the state? I know federal authorities won’t do anything , but can Minnesota try him?

Yes.

Minnesota can charge the shooter, but because he’s a federal agent the US Attorney can invoke the supremacy clause to remove the action to federal court and can either dismiss the charges, or put on an intentionally half assed prosecution which should it result in conviction, Trump will issue an immediate pardon. Or he will simply preemptively pardon the murderous agent. Since Trump and his DOJ leadership are both utterly corrupt, I suspect this POS is going to get away with murder.

“Although federal officers do have immunity in some circumstances, that protection applies only if their actions were authorized under federal law and “necessary and proper” in fulfilling federal duties. When federal officers violate federal law or act unreasonably when carrying out their duties, they can face state charges.

States have a long history of prosecuting federal officials for allegedly using excessive force on the job. And when federal courts agree that the force may not have been legally justified, they have allowed the state prosecution to proceed.”
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2026/01/is-minneapolis-ice-shooter-immune-state-prosecution-supreme-court.html

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One key aspect I have not seen discussed here or in the media:

- did the officers show their warrant to anybody there?

Because if they didn’t show a valid warrant then they were breaking the law! Has anyone even asked?

they were not on active patrol...they were heading back to their HQ for a break...so there was no warrant or frankly, any reason for them to stop, at all

So if an off-duty police officer sees you in trouble, they should not stop to help?

If an off-duty police officer sees someone parked in the street illegally, yes, they can stop and investigate. Sure. But if they aren't in a police car with flashing red lights, and they aren't wearing a uniform with ID - you don't have to pull over for them. How do you know they are cops?

Anonymous wrote:

His job is to stop her. JFC

And this is the problem. People don't seem to understand the job of ICE. As poorly trained and incompetent as they are, do you really want people thinking that their job is to be state troopers or city police officers?

If their job is to be state troopers and city police officers then they need to act like state troopers and municipal police officers.

Proper shield and badges as visible identification for accountability. Body cameras. Visible faces. They need training like police officers and state troopers, and background checks.