Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The smear on Pete Hegseth is troubling. It looks like a disgruntled former employee is executing a smear. The former head of his organization has now clarified he left due to different of opinion on direction. There were zero issues with his conduct. Why was that not in any of these articles? That is what should stand. His marriage in 2018 is not an issue. He has a bad divorce like 50 percent of country. His mom doing interview today was helpful because nowhere was it reported that she apologized for the inital email two hours later. She was upset he was getting divorced and has said that years later he is happy and in a great marriage. Somehow that was not included in any of these articles out there. Not that his marriage is anyone’s business. Low blow for anyone to leak initial email fyi. Senators should not allow smears to affect their thinking of him as a candidate. Hegseth will be a Sec of Defense who puts our soldiers first and cares about their well being. He also is not a fan of endless wars. This is a good thing.

You’re ridiculous but here’s the thing about military leadership. Optics matter. Live your live in such a way that no one can even make these accusations.

Exactly. It’s funny how many millions of men (white men!) don’t have a single “false” accusation against them. Haven’t been “maligned” by people out to get them.

You actually have no idea about this. But it does seem that handsome men in public positions often have “allegations” come out as they start to gain power/popularity or especially if they are taking a political position. Coincidence?

Oh look, the mansplainer arrived. The coincidence lies in the fact these men believe they are owed everything and act accordingly.

Ugh. People like you are why Trump won. Hope you know that.

Oh look, at it again. You can’t help yourself, right? I didn’t vote for a felon. I didn’t vote for a sexual assaulter. The people who did are the reason why the felon won.

Going to be a long 4 years for you.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The smear on Pete Hegseth is troubling. It looks like a disgruntled former employee is executing a smear. The former head of his organization has now clarified he left due to different of opinion on direction. There were zero issues with his conduct. Why was that not in any of these articles? That is what should stand. His marriage in 2018 is not an issue. He has a bad divorce like 50 percent of country. His mom doing interview today was helpful because nowhere was it reported that she apologized for the inital email two hours later. She was upset he was getting divorced and has said that years later he is happy and in a great marriage. Somehow that was not included in any of these articles out there. Not that his marriage is anyone’s business. Low blow for anyone to leak initial email fyi. Senators should not allow smears to affect their thinking of him as a candidate. Hegseth will be a Sec of Defense who puts our soldiers first and cares about their well being. He also is not a fan of endless wars. This is a good thing.

You’re ridiculous but here’s the thing about military leadership. Optics matter. Live your live in such a way that no one can even make these accusations.

Exactly. It’s funny how many millions of men (white men!) don’t have a single “false” accusation against them. Haven’t been “maligned” by people out to get them.

You actually have no idea about this. But it does seem that handsome men in public positions often have “allegations” come out as they start to gain power/popularity or especially if they are taking a political position. Coincidence?

Oh look, the mansplainer arrived. The coincidence lies in the fact these men believe they are owed everything and act accordingly.

Ugh. People like you are why Trump won. Hope you know that.

Oh look, at it again. You can’t help yourself, right? I didn’t vote for a felon. I didn’t vote for a sexual assaulter. The people who did are the reason why the felon won.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The smear on Pete Hegseth is troubling. It looks like a disgruntled former employee is executing a smear. The former head of his organization has now clarified he left due to different of opinion on direction. There were zero issues with his conduct. Why was that not in any of these articles? That is what should stand. His marriage in 2018 is not an issue. He has a bad divorce like 50 percent of country. His mom doing interview today was helpful because nowhere was it reported that she apologized for the inital email two hours later. She was upset he was getting divorced and has said that years later he is happy and in a great marriage. Somehow that was not included in any of these articles out there. Not that his marriage is anyone’s business. Low blow for anyone to leak initial email fyi. Senators should not allow smears to affect their thinking of him as a candidate. Hegseth will be a Sec of Defense who puts our soldiers first and cares about their well being. He also is not a fan of endless wars. This is a good thing.

You’re ridiculous but here’s the thing about military leadership. Optics matter. Live your live in such a way that no one can even make these accusations.

Exactly. It’s funny how many millions of men (white men!) don’t have a single “false” accusation against them. Haven’t been “maligned” by people out to get them.

You actually have no idea about this. But it does seem that handsome men in public positions often have “allegations” come out as they start to gain power/popularity or especially if they are taking a political position. Coincidence?

Oh look, the mansplainer arrived. The coincidence lies in the fact these men believe they are owed everything and act accordingly.

Ugh. People like you are why Trump won. Hope you know that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The smear on Pete Hegseth is troubling. It looks like a disgruntled former employee is executing a smear. The former head of his organization has now clarified he left due to different of opinion on direction. There were zero issues with his conduct. Why was that not in any of these articles? That is what should stand. His marriage in 2018 is not an issue. He has a bad divorce like 50 percent of country. His mom doing interview today was helpful because nowhere was it reported that she apologized for the inital email two hours later. She was upset he was getting divorced and has said that years later he is happy and in a great marriage. Somehow that was not included in any of these articles out there. Not that his marriage is anyone’s business. Low blow for anyone to leak initial email fyi. Senators should not allow smears to affect their thinking of him as a candidate. Hegseth will be a Sec of Defense who puts our soldiers first and cares about their well being. He also is not a fan of endless wars. This is a good thing.

You’re ridiculous but here’s the thing about military leadership. Optics matter. Live your live in such a way that no one can even make these accusations.

Exactly. It’s funny how many millions of men (white men!) don’t have a single “false” accusation against them. Haven’t been “maligned” by people out to get them.

You actually have no idea about this. But it does seem that handsome men in public positions often have “allegations” come out as they start to gain power/popularity or especially if they are taking a political position. Coincidence?

Oh look, the mansplainer arrived. The coincidence lies in the fact these men believe they are owed everything and act accordingly.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The smear on Pete Hegseth is troubling. It looks like a disgruntled former employee is executing a smear. The former head of his organization has now clarified he left due to different of opinion on direction. There were zero issues with his conduct. Why was that not in any of these articles? That is what should stand. His marriage in 2018 is not an issue. He has a bad divorce like 50 percent of country. His mom doing interview today was helpful because nowhere was it reported that she apologized for the inital email two hours later. She was upset he was getting divorced and has said that years later he is happy and in a great marriage. Somehow that was not included in any of these articles out there. Not that his marriage is anyone’s business. Low blow for anyone to leak initial email fyi. Senators should not allow smears to affect their thinking of him as a candidate. Hegseth will be a Sec of Defense who puts our soldiers first and cares about their well being. He also is not a fan of endless wars. This is a good thing.

You’re ridiculous but here’s the thing about military leadership. Optics matter. Live your live in such a way that no one can even make these accusations.

Exactly. It’s funny how many millions of men (white men!) don’t have a single “false” accusation against them. Haven’t been “maligned” by people out to get them.

You actually have no idea about this. But it does seem that handsome men in public positions often have “allegations” come out as they start to gain power/popularity or especially if they are taking a political position. Coincidence?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His mommy says what she said about him isn't true--"at least any more"!

Mommy is clearly getting paid to disavow what she said. So funny to hear a Boomer mom spin spin spin about her son when we have a copy of her true thoughts written down.

10 bucks says grandma is pissed off that Hegseth's second wife is withholding access to the grandchildren.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The smear on Pete Hegseth is troubling. It looks like a disgruntled former employee is executing a smear. The former head of his organization has now clarified he left due to different of opinion on direction. There were zero issues with his conduct. Why was that not in any of these articles? That is what should stand. His marriage in 2018 is not an issue. He has a bad divorce like 50 percent of country. His mom doing interview today was helpful because nowhere was it reported that she apologized for the inital email two hours later. She was upset he was getting divorced and has said that years later he is happy and in a great marriage. Somehow that was not included in any of these articles out there. Not that his marriage is anyone’s business. Low blow for anyone to leak initial email fyi. Senators should not allow smears to affect their thinking of him as a candidate. Hegseth will be a Sec of Defense who puts our soldiers first and cares about their well being. He also is not a fan of endless wars. This is a good thing.

You’re ridiculous but here’s the thing about military leadership. Optics matter. Live your live in such a way that no one can even make these accusations.

Exactly. It’s funny how many millions of men (white men!) don’t have a single “false” accusation against them. Haven’t been “maligned” by people out to get them.

You actually have no idea about this. But it does seem that handsome men in public positions often have “allegations” come out as they start to gain power/popularity or especially if they are taking a political position. Coincidence?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Desantis is the alternative, I don't see how the Administration doesn't say yes to that, even given the primary fights.

Hegseth is a sharp guy, but his character faults are well known.

Sexual assault is a bit more than a character flaw.

Anonymous wrote:quid, meet quo

“The Bulwark reported Wednesday morning that
**the potential of DeSantis nominating Lara Trump as a senator** could factor into the decision to appoint the governor to lead the Department of Defense”

Anonymous wrote:If Desantis is the alternative, I don't see how the Administration doesn't say yes to that, even given the primary fights.

Hegseth is a sharp guy, but his character faults are well known.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The smear on Pete Hegseth is troubling. It looks like a disgruntled former employee is executing a smear. The former head of his organization has now clarified he left due to different of opinion on direction. There were zero issues with his conduct. Why was that not in any of these articles? That is what should stand. His marriage in 2018 is not an issue. He has a bad divorce like 50 percent of country. His mom doing interview today was helpful because nowhere was it reported that she apologized for the inital email two hours later. She was upset he was getting divorced and has said that years later he is happy and in a great marriage. Somehow that was not included in any of these articles out there. Not that his marriage is anyone’s business. Low blow for anyone to leak initial email fyi. Senators should not allow smears to affect their thinking of him as a candidate. Hegseth will be a Sec of Defense who puts our soldiers first and cares about their well being. He also is not a fan of endless wars. This is a good thing.

You’re ridiculous but here’s the thing about military leadership. Optics matter. Live your live in such a way that no one can even make these accusations.

Exactly. It’s funny how many millions of men (white men!) don’t have a single “false” accusation against them. Haven’t been “maligned” by people out to get them.

Anonymous wrote:His mommy says what she said about him isn't true--"at least any more"!