Anonymous
Post 03/09/2024 06:07     Subject: Biden's SOTU

Why didn't Johnson rip up the speech at the end like Nancy?
Anonymous
Post 03/09/2024 03:29     Subject: Re:Biden's SOTU

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My favorite part was when he basically told the GOP justices that women were coming for them.


Yeah. Threatening Supreme Court Justices is always a good look.
He's showing people who he is.


He wasn't threatening them. He was mocking them. And rightfully so. They deserve every women's scorn.


Well, this woman is not scorning him.
I will never apologize for advocating for the life of innocent, unborn children.

Obama was crucified when he criticized the SCOTUS during his SOTU.
Biden didn't criticize... he threatened. You call it mocking. It sounded like a threat - much like Schumer did years ago.
This is the new Democrat. Don't like a ruling? Threaten them.
And, when we have another Democratic nutter caught in an assassination attempt, we know who prompted it.
I hope all Justices have SS protection. They need it.


Good for you, Serena. You're being a hysterical shrew. No, he didn't "threaten" them. You perfectly well, he meant at the ballot box. And was mocking them.

You're a psycho.

PS- anyone remember the original terrorists of SCOTUS ruling? You know those delightful types that bombed abortion clinics and ACTUALLY threatened and killed abortion providers? Put down the rocks in your glass house. Hypocrite.


Hysterical shrew here.
He threatened them.
As I said, I hope they all have SS protection.


A shrew and not very bright. At least you own it. Just like Serena.


I am actually quite a bright shrew. Advanced degrees. Plural.
In DCUM world, that makes me "highly educated." I've read that here a lot.


Ah so you’re an elitist. Figures
Anonymous
Post 03/09/2024 02:15     Subject: Re:Biden's SOTU

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:"The free world deserves better", unless you're a woman who needs a life saving abortion.


Then go get an abortion. Very easy to do in the DMV area.


Not if you live in Texas.


So travel to a state that allows it. Is there some lib law that prevents you from traveling to different states? Doesn’t seem to be stopping New Yorkers from fleeing the insanity, crime, and ultra high taxes of that state. Or just amend the Constitution.


Not everyone can afford to travel or take time off from work.


Sorry not buying that. If you are typing that reply into your smart phone or on a computer then you can afford it. Buses are cheap.


I’m sure this would be your response to yourself if you needed urgent, though routine, surgery but had to travel across 4 states and take 4 days off work to get it because the legislature in your state had voted to ban that procedure. Yes, you’d be totally fine with that inconvenience. Because being forced to travel 500 miles for healthcare owing to your state legislature is no big deal. Even if you have small children you’d need to figure out what to do with and a job that didn’t give you paid sick leave and would fire you for taking off so many days in a row. No big deal.
Anonymous
Post 03/09/2024 00:33     Subject: Biden's SOTU

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why were there so many hecklers? I don’t remember so many interruptions at one time before for a SOTU speech.


Taking the lead from GOP Rep. Joe "You Lie!" Wilson. Once the disrespect is out of the bottle, there isn't any putting in back in.



I think they learned from Nancy Pelosi.
If you can publicly rip up the SOTU, anything is acceptable.


She did that after the speech. She did not interrupt Trump’s idiotic speech.


Oh wow. Forest, trees anyone??




Read the thread for once. The topic was all the rude interruptions during the speech. You or some other gaslighter said Pelosi started it. I’m just pointing out that you are wrong and ridiculous.
Anonymous
Post 03/09/2024 00:03     Subject: Re:Biden's SOTU

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Boy Speaker is a petty, little man.

And yes, it did happen.

Boy Speaker's staff hanging on every word of POTUS.


They desperately wanted to go home but had to be polite.

Instead of wandering around DC, inside the same place he’s been for decades, Joe should wander around America and speak to people who aren’t political animals.
Anonymous
Post 03/08/2024 23:49     Subject: Re:Biden's SOTU

Anonymous wrote:


BREAKING: Joe Biden’s wild economic claims during his State of the Union address were fact-checked six times by The New York Times.

1. “15 million new jobs in just three years — a record,” Biden claimed.
• The Times ruled the claim needed context because the job gains “were beginning to return” before Biden came to office from the huge losses during the pandemic.

2. “My policies have attracted $650 billion in private sector investment, in clean energy, advanced manufacturing, creating tens of thousands of jobs here in America!”
• The Times ruled Biden’s statement lacked context and Biden calculated $650 billion based on “public announcements of investments — not necessarily dollars spent — across industries targeted by Mr. Biden’s legislative accomplishments.”

3. “I am cutting our carbon emissions in half by 2030.”
• The Times determined that Biden’s statement lacked context and Biden confused his goal of cutting emissions in half with what his actual policies would cut.

4. “We’ve already cut the federal deficit over a trillion dollars.”
•The Times ruled Biden’s claim needed context:
Under Mr. Biden’s watch, the federal deficit dropped to $1.4 trillion in fiscal year 2022 from $3.1 trillion in fiscal year 2021 — but much of that reduction was attributed to the expiration of coronavirus relief spending. The deficit then rose in 2023, to about $1.7 trillion. The deficit remains higher than it was before the coronavirus pandemic.

5. “You know, there are 1,000 billionaires in America. You know what the average federal tax is for these billionaires? They are making great sacrifices: 8.2 percent. That’s far less than the vast majority of Americans’ pay.”
•The Times reported Biden’s claim did not “technically” reflect the current tax rate.

6. “Many of my friends on the other side of the aisle want to put Social Security on the chopping block.”
•“Republicans are not currently calling for cuts to Social Security,” the Times said. Former President Trump, in fact, said in 2022 that he would never cut Social Security.


On #6, the Times is lying. The Republican Study Committee, which comprises 175 House Republicans ("many") proposed significant cuts to Social Security. Of course, we all know that Trump always keeps his word.

https://crr.bc.edu/congressional-republicans-want-big-cuts-to-social-security/

Anonymous
Post 03/08/2024 21:44     Subject: Re:Biden's SOTU

Anonymous wrote:


BREAKING: Joe Biden’s wild economic claims during his State of the Union address were fact-checked six times by The New York Times.

1. “15 million new jobs in just three years — a record,” Biden claimed.
• The Times ruled the claim needed context because the job gains “were beginning to return” before Biden came to office from the huge losses during the pandemic.

2. “My policies have attracted $650 billion in private sector investment, in clean energy, advanced manufacturing, creating tens of thousands of jobs here in America!”
• The Times ruled Biden’s statement lacked context and Biden calculated $650 billion based on “public announcements of investments — not necessarily dollars spent — across industries targeted by Mr. Biden’s legislative accomplishments.”

3. “I am cutting our carbon emissions in half by 2030.”
• The Times determined that Biden’s statement lacked context and Biden confused his goal of cutting emissions in half with what his actual policies would cut.

4. “We’ve already cut the federal deficit over a trillion dollars.”
•The Times ruled Biden’s claim needed context:
Under Mr. Biden’s watch, the federal deficit dropped to $1.4 trillion in fiscal year 2022 from $3.1 trillion in fiscal year 2021 — but much of that reduction was attributed to the expiration of coronavirus relief spending. The deficit then rose in 2023, to about $1.7 trillion. The deficit remains higher than it was before the coronavirus pandemic.

5. “You know, there are 1,000 billionaires in America. You know what the average federal tax is for these billionaires? They are making great sacrifices: 8.2 percent. That’s far less than the vast majority of Americans’ pay.”
•The Times reported Biden’s claim did not “technically” reflect the current tax rate.

6. “Many of my friends on the other side of the aisle want to put Social Security on the chopping block.”
•“Republicans are not currently calling for cuts to Social Security,” the Times said. Former President Trump, in fact, said in 2022 that he would never cut Social Security.

Cute to see the supporters of a pathological liar and convicted rapist suddenly profess concern for accuracy.
Anonymous
Post 03/08/2024 21:07     Subject: Re:Biden's SOTU

Anonymous wrote:Boy Speaker is a petty, little man.

And yes, it did happen.

Boy Speaker's staff hanging on every word of POTUS.
Anonymous
Post 03/08/2024 20:48     Subject: Biden's SOTU

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why were there so many hecklers? I don’t remember so many interruptions at one time before for a SOTU speech.


Taking the lead from GOP Rep. Joe "You Lie!" Wilson. Once the disrespect is out of the bottle, there isn't any putting in back in.



I think they learned from Nancy Pelosi.
If you can publicly rip up the SOTU, anything is acceptable.


She did that after the speech. She did not interrupt Trump’s idiotic speech.


Oh wow. Forest, trees anyone??


Anonymous
Post 03/08/2024 20:46     Subject: Biden's SOTU

Marjorie Taylor Greene looked ridiculous yesterday like a kid in detention with the MAGA hat and interruptions .
Anonymous
Post 03/08/2024 20:24     Subject: Re:Biden's SOTU




BREAKING: Joe Biden’s wild economic claims during his State of the Union address were fact-checked six times by The New York Times.

1. “15 million new jobs in just three years — a record,” Biden claimed.
• The Times ruled the claim needed context because the job gains “were beginning to return” before Biden came to office from the huge losses during the pandemic.

2. “My policies have attracted $650 billion in private sector investment, in clean energy, advanced manufacturing, creating tens of thousands of jobs here in America!”
• The Times ruled Biden’s statement lacked context and Biden calculated $650 billion based on “public announcements of investments — not necessarily dollars spent — across industries targeted by Mr. Biden’s legislative accomplishments.”

3. “I am cutting our carbon emissions in half by 2030.”
• The Times determined that Biden’s statement lacked context and Biden confused his goal of cutting emissions in half with what his actual policies would cut.

4. “We’ve already cut the federal deficit over a trillion dollars.”
•The Times ruled Biden’s claim needed context:
Under Mr. Biden’s watch, the federal deficit dropped to $1.4 trillion in fiscal year 2022 from $3.1 trillion in fiscal year 2021 — but much of that reduction was attributed to the expiration of coronavirus relief spending. The deficit then rose in 2023, to about $1.7 trillion. The deficit remains higher than it was before the coronavirus pandemic.

5. “You know, there are 1,000 billionaires in America. You know what the average federal tax is for these billionaires? They are making great sacrifices: 8.2 percent. That’s far less than the vast majority of Americans’ pay.”
•The Times reported Biden’s claim did not “technically” reflect the current tax rate.

6. “Many of my friends on the other side of the aisle want to put Social Security on the chopping block.”
•“Republicans are not currently calling for cuts to Social Security,” the Times said. Former President Trump, in fact, said in 2022 that he would never cut Social Security.
Anonymous
Post 03/08/2024 19:56     Subject: Biden's SOTU

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:All these people who yawned at a million dying of COVID and think a raped 10 year old should have to carry her rapist's baby are pretending to give a shit about what happened to one woman.


Young women attending college shouldn’t end up dead in the woods with a disfigured skull.

Covid was a disease that no one could stop. The 10 year old’s mother was allowing her boyfriend and other adult males rape her child. Both very tragic circumstances.

But American women should be able to go for a run around their college campus without being killed by a man who SHOULD NOT EVEN BE IN OUR COUNTRY.


But, but, but!!! Special pleading. Ignoring all these other deaths for ... reasons, and then pretending to care about this specific tragedy out of ghoulish political expediency.


No one is pretending. We care about this case, as would you if you would take your political blinders off. This was preventable.


So is women dying from dying fetuses they can't abort.

Yeah, but those are whores that had sex!
Anonymous
Post 03/08/2024 19:20     Subject: Biden's SOTU

Anonymous wrote:

NO ONE wants criminals to go unpunished, NO ONE excuses the murder of innocent people.


170 Democrats voted no the other day on deporting immigrants who commit crimes.
Anonymous
Post 03/08/2024 19:18     Subject: Biden's SOTU

My condolences to USC for their loss.
Anonymous
Post 03/08/2024 19:06     Subject: Biden's SOTU

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I was on the fence about voting for Biden but his speech last night convinced me that he needs to go.


I don’t understand people who say they are undecided. At this point we have years of experience with both apparent candidates. Sure, the Democrats should have found someone younger. They didn’t. We can now pick Biden or a narcissist psychopath who has no actual interest in helping Americans,


Biden or any other socialist Democrat won’t get my vote.

Ironically, you’re voting for a Nazi instead.


Says the person voting for someone who bankrolls the Azov Battalion. Very, very rich.

I’m gonna love the ads that juxtapose his fiery speech against dictators killing innocent civilians with images of children in Gaza playing in the background. The hubris and hypocrisy of Blue MAGA is insane.

LOL at the MAGA spouting Kremlin talking points.