Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looks like the GOP will have to carry Santos to full term.
He has to resign if he gets convicted of felonies, because he’ll lose his committee positions and his ability to vote. Just like the last three Republican members who were convicted of felonies.
Anonymous wrote:Looks like the GOP will have to carry Santos to full term.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The people of his district have no representation and that is not right. He should be removed immediately. If this fool was in any of their districts, they would have booted him.
I may have missed it, but can they recall him? Maybe they don't have the ability to do that. They should change the rules for the future. All districts should be allowed to recall their local rep, for exactly this reason.
No, they don't and the rules cannot be changed without an amendment to the US constitution. Not happening.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The people of his district have no representation and that is not right. He should be removed immediately. If this fool was in any of their districts, they would have booted him.
I may have missed it, but can they recall him? Maybe they don't have the ability to do that. They should change the rules for the future. All districts should be allowed to recall their local rep, for exactly this reason.
Anonymous wrote:The people of his district have no representation and that is not right. He should be removed immediately. If this fool was in any of their districts, they would have booted him.
Anonymous wrote:Raskin is correct here.
Santos has no business being in the House, but we all know that if a member can be kicked out without external due process, the GOP would just use a majority to remove whatever members they felt like based on the Santos precedent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why would dems vote present and not help get him kicked out?
Here's the statement from Jamie Raskin. I agree with him and I'm as hard core leftist as you can get.
Yet the GOP still pretty much supports an open and obvious fraud in their midst. They should be pressuring him to quit. They aren’t.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why would dems vote present and not help get him kicked out?
Here's the statement from Jamie Raskin. I agree with him and I'm as hard core leftist as you can get.
Anonymous wrote:Raskin is correct here.
Santos has no business being in the House, but we all know that if a member can be kicked out without external due process, the GOP would just use a majority to remove whatever members they felt like based on the Santos precedent.