Anonymous wrote:LOL, 6-3 decision, not even close.

Here comes the summer of rage.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The left did this to themselves by insisting on aborting up until full term birth (gross). Now states will rightly decide.

I would encourage you to read more about late-term abortions who has them and what they actually entail because it doesn't seem like you know the facts

I know someone who had to give birth to a dead baby. It was beyond horrible, and it has scarred her and her husband for life.

This will happen more and more when women can't have an abortion before viability, when life-threatening defects in the fetus are discovered.

Yes, it will. And the anti-women's health crowd will say too bad. Because they don't care about women. I went to Catholic school and I heard all about this in religion classes. They really, truly don't care about real people's lived experience.

They don’t care, at all. It’s all waved away, doesn’t matter. “Give it to God.” Forced birthers do not care about the kind of misery, pain, poverty and destroyed lives that they’re causing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Younger generations have been more pro-life than their parents. The politics of this may not play out as intended.

On the other hand, this will lead to the birth of more babies that will grow up to vote for Democrats.

Younger generations are also less sexually active. And have fewer babies.

This decision may affect one or more of those statistics. Or not.

DP. See earlier post. It's not true. People 18 to 29 are way way way more pro-choice than any previous generation

Pro choice about what issue? Pro abortion?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The left did this to themselves by insisting on aborting up until full term birth (gross). Now states will rightly decide.

I would encourage you to read more about late-term abortions who has them and what they actually entail because it doesn't seem like you know the facts

I know someone who had to give birth to a dead baby. It was beyond horrible, and it has scarred her and her husband for life.

This will happen more and more when women can't have an abortion before viability, when life-threatening defects in the fetus are discovered.

Yes, it will. And the anti-women's health crowd will say too bad. Because they don't care about women. I went to Catholic school and I heard all about this in religion classes. They really, truly don't care about real people's lived experience.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The left did this to themselves by insisting on aborting up until full term birth (gross). Now states will rightly decide.

I would encourage you to read more about late-term abortions who has them and what they actually entail because it doesn't seem like you know the facts

I know someone who had to give birth to a dead baby. It was beyond horrible, and it has scarred her and her husband for life.

This will happen more and more when women can't have an abortion before viability, when life-threatening defects in the fetus are discovered.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Summer of discontent continues. Abortion, guns, inflation, extreme heat. A bad mixture and I hope things don't boil up.

Oh i hope they do boil up. I hope the country implodes as a result of this .

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Finally, after the suctioning of 63 million growing babies

STFU you total POS!!

those were fetuses, not "babies"

grow a brain and learn the difference

I've been pregnant 3 times. Not once did any of my doctors (male or female) refer to my pregnancy with the word fetus.

Mine did.

But sounds like your pregnancies were wanted. Sounds like you were willing to gestate them to term, to go through labor and delivery, to have your body changed, to accept the danger of pregnancy and birthing, and to take on the responsibility of raising children. Not all women accept those things, and no government should be able to force them to.

Those doctors did nit know what I was thinking or planning to do when they first saw me.

Noticed that you didn't address the question of other women not accepting the choice you made to undergo a potentially life-threatening process.

No, because that's not what I was addressing. I'll say it again, no doctor, female or male, ever referred to my "fetus."

So? Why should we care?

Women who want their pregnancies should have access to the medical treatments that will allow them to sustain them and give birth to a healthy baby.

Women who DO NOT want their pregnancies should have access to the medical treatments that allow them to terminate the pregnancy and have a full and healthy recovery.

Women who want their pregnancies, but come to find that their pregnancies will result in a child that is not viable outside of the womb OR that the pregnancy may jeopardize their life should have access to the medical treatments that allow th to terminate the pregnancy and have a full and healthy recovery.

PERIOD.

So sick of "prolifers" putting the "rights" of a pregnancy above those of a fully formed, independent adult woman.

You should care because describing a growing baby as "just a fetus" is not accurate. Of course, that's not saying you can't maintain your pro abortion stance anyway

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The left did this to themselves by insisting on aborting up until full term birth (gross). Now states will rightly decide.

I would encourage you to read more about late-term abortions who has them and what they actually entail because it doesn't seem like you know the facts

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This will have consequences. I already told my twin daughters not to apply to any colleges in those anti-abortion states.

Interesting emphasis on being able to obtain an abortion while in college.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So gun safety should NOT be decided by state legislatures (such as the NY legislature), but abortion should be. Right.
It's horrific that a 6-3 majority thinks so little of precedent, of lying under oath, or of women's privacy rights. I had an abortion at age 22--so grateful I lived in a country (not the US) where abortion was safe and legal.
There will be A LOT of litigation surrounding this, since your right to an abortion will vary depending on where you live--denying you equal protection of the laws.

This is a right expressly written in the Constitution.
This is the argument that will make abortion safe and legal forever.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what's the first case we can get to the supreme Court to get this s*** turned around?

Whoa whoa whoa—state decisis anyone?

The problem is that the reasoning behind Roe is fairly shaky.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what's the first case we can get to the supreme Court to get this s*** turned around?

Probably not for at least 20+ years when Democrats maybe can get a liberal majority back on the Court.

No, wrong.

Make a case that the SCOTUS can't rule the wrong way. It can happen with the right strategy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what's the first case we can get to the supreme Court to get this s*** turned around?

Whoa whoa whoa—state decisis anyone?