No, there are no public schools for good reason. Up until a few years ago Landon would play Churchill. The last time was a few years ago-Churchill had a couple of really good players committed to places like Brown. There was some chirping that this could be the year when a public might take out Landon. It was maybe 10-1 Landon at half and the benches emptied early in the 2nd.

If you want to add a few more schools put in Episcopal and St. Albans. The publics just don’t have the depth.

Anonymous wrote:No public schools?

I'd put Churchill in there.

No public schools?

Feels like the season is just around the corner. My preseason:

SJC
Prep
GZ
Landon
SSAS
Bullis
Paul VI

1. SJC
2. Prep
3. Bullis / Landon
4. Saints
5. PVI
6. Gonzaga

Big drop off after Gonzaga / PVI

Feels like the season is just around the corner. My preseason:

SJC
Prep
GZ
Landon
SSAS
Bullis
Paul VI

Didn’t realize Bullis AD was leaving. Who are the top candidates and has there been a philosophy change with regard to athlete recruiting not based on need?

Not all the schedules have been posted yet, but probably will be by first week or so of February.

I'd like to see a list.

Lots of good match ups this spring between DC schools and miaa schools

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bullis, Prep, Landon and Gonzaga don’t pay for talent.

Um actually Bullis does (or did until very recently with headmaster change). The rest don't.

Can confirm, they all do. Every one of them.

All of the schools market themselves as offering need based financial aid. Some schools will extend a grant to a player who borderline qualifies for aid hence the gray zone.

I know some families at all of these schools and some who are rather very very well off, and have a son who happens to be a good lacrosse player, I can assure you, they aren’t receiving aid.

^^^ +100

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bullis, Prep, Landon and Gonzaga don’t pay for talent.

Um actually Bullis does (or did until very recently with headmaster change). The rest don't.

Can confirm, they all do. Every one of them.

All of the schools market themselves as offering need based financial aid. Some schools will extend a grant to a player who borderline qualifies for aid hence the gray zone.

I know some families at all of these schools and some who are rather very very well off, and have a son who happens to be a good lacrosse player, I can assure you, they aren’t receiving aid.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bullis, Prep, Landon and Gonzaga don’t pay for talent.

Um actually Bullis does (or did until very recently with headmaster change). The rest don't.

Can confirm, they all do. Every one of them.

My name is Joel Goodson. I deal in human fulfillment. I grossed over eight thousand dollars in one night. Time of your life, huh kid?

Maybe he was teaching 'economics' on the side?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How about the social agenda of MadLax? The owner harassing and Bullying teenage boys. Assaulting players on his team (Hobart/SJC) and allowing them to have hookers (Potomac school).

That’s a social agenda alright

I was aware of the MadLax owner verbally harassing kids over email but unaware of any story around his players having hookers when he was coaching at the Potomac School, I didn't even know he coached at the Potomac School.

It wasn't Potomac, it was SJC. Potomac learned about it later.