Anonymous wrote:
For the record, people who used this post to castigate liberals. I'm a liberal. Very, very liberal. What I angers me, is the "smart growth" folks is their insistence that they get affordable housing in Ward 3. There are a lot of less expensive places to live in this city. But you want to live with the other rich white people. Ward 8. PG County, parts of MoCo, have less expensive housing. Buy a condo. DO you know how many families of four are living in a 650 square foot apartments in NYC with hour long commutes on a loud smelly trains? you all need to grow up.
Anonymous wrote:What is market-rate development? It seems we have market-rate development now.
Anonymous wrote:
For the record, people who used this post to castigate liberals. I'm a liberal. Very, very liberal. What I angers me, is the "smart growth" folks is their insistence that they get affordable housing in Ward 3. There are a lot of less expensive places to live in this city. But you want to live with the other rich white people. Ward 8. PG County, parts of MoCo, have less expensive housing. Buy a condo. DO you know how many families of four are living in a 650 square foot apartments in NYC with hour long commutes on a loud smelly trains? you all need to grow up.
Anonymous wrote:Take race off the table. That issue cuts both ways.
1. Rich people in SFH's don't want people of color moving into their neighborhoods..
2. The Upzoning crowd could have access to affordable housing but they don't want to neighborhoods with diverse populations.
Race is a charged accusation. I think folks should put it down for this debate and focus on the housing issue - which has legit points of view on both sides.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is market-rate development? It seems we have market-rate development now.
DC has lots of it. Even in Ward 3, which the development lobby claims has no new housing being built, there are currently 2000+ new market-rate units under construction (1500 across from Sidwell Friends School alone), and much more in the pipeline.
However, what the market seems to want in DC right now is single family homes, so now is hardly the time to re-zone SFH neighborhoods to high density.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is market-rate development? It seems we have market-rate development now.
DC has lots of it. Even in Ward 3, which the development lobby claims has no new housing being built, there are currently 2000+ new market-rate units under construction (1500 across from Sidwell Friends School alone), and much more in the pipeline.
However, what the market seems to want in DC right now is single family homes, so now is hardly the time to re-zone SFH neighborhoods to high density.
Anonymous wrote:What is market-rate development? It seems we have market-rate development now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I really don’t understand people who say there is no affordable housing in a city that is one top ten markets in the richest country in the world. Go get a job that pays more or commute like the rest of the 7 billion people on the planet. What makes you so special? Go big or go home. That’s life in the city.
For the record, people who used this post to castigate liberals. I'm a liberal. Very, very liberal. What I angers me, is the "smart growth" folks is their insistence that they get affordable housing in Ward 3. There are a lot of less expensive places to live in this city. But you want to live with the other rich white people. Ward 8. PG County, parts of MoCo, have less expensive housing. Buy a condo. DO you know how many families of four are living in a 650 square foot apartments in NYC with hour long commutes on a loud smelly trains? you all need to grow up.
It isn't that the smart growth advocates want the housing for themselves. Most of them live in million + homes. They want affordable housing for their communities because they believe in 1) more density supporting the local retail 2) economic and racial diversity and 3) environmental benefits of having more people live in a compact urban center rather than plowing up more fields for single family homes.
Are you opposed to those three things?
Of course rich people living in $1M homes don't want more SFHs. They don't care what everyone else is left with, especially the poors.
They want more diverse people in their neighborhood, which based on your response, or lack thereof, you are opposed to. And they are fine with people living in SFH, but it is unsustainable to have all of the acres of land just be SFH. So you are basically opposed to the three elements I posted. Fair enough.
These are just developer talking points to persuade DC to relax zoning for much more market-rate, dense development. Most people can see through this cynical spin. For example, the chair of Cleveland Park Smart Growth owns a business that was the national pollster for the Trump campaign while Trump was promising the save neighborhoods from affordable housing. And then he and other Smart Growth lobbyists pivot for other clients to push Smart Growth as encouraging affordable housing, racial diversity and environmental benefits? Such horse hooey!
You keep bringing up this Trump dude. Hint champ, nobody cares. It's polling. Nobody. Cares.
Thousands of new jobs are being created in DC. Market-rate development is needed. Sorry to burst your bubble. Take Econ 101.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I really don’t understand people who say there is no affordable housing in a city that is one top ten markets in the richest country in the world. Go get a job that pays more or commute like the rest of the 7 billion people on the planet. What makes you so special? Go big or go home. That’s life in the city.
For the record, people who used this post to castigate liberals. I'm a liberal. Very, very liberal. What I angers me, is the "smart growth" folks is their insistence that they get affordable housing in Ward 3. There are a lot of less expensive places to live in this city. But you want to live with the other rich white people. Ward 8. PG County, parts of MoCo, have less expensive housing. Buy a condo. DO you know how many families of four are living in a 650 square foot apartments in NYC with hour long commutes on a loud smelly trains? you all need to grow up.
It isn't that the smart growth advocates want the housing for themselves. Most of them live in million + homes. They want affordable housing for their communities because they believe in 1) more density supporting the local retail 2) economic and racial diversity and 3) environmental benefits of having more people live in a compact urban center rather than plowing up more fields for single family homes.
Are you opposed to those three things?
Of course rich people living in $1M homes don't want more SFHs. They don't care what everyone else is left with, especially the poors.
They want more diverse people in their neighborhood, which based on your response, or lack thereof, you are opposed to. And they are fine with people living in SFH, but it is unsustainable to have all of the acres of land just be SFH. So you are basically opposed to the three elements I posted. Fair enough.
These are just developer talking points to persuade DC to relax zoning for much more market-rate, dense development. Most people can see through this cynical spin. For example, the chair of Cleveland Park Smart Growth owns a business that was the national pollster for the Trump campaign while Trump was promising the save neighborhoods from affordable housing. And then he and other Smart Growth lobbyists pivot for other clients to push Smart Growth as encouraging affordable housing, racial diversity and environmental benefits? Such horse hooey!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I really don’t understand people who say there is no affordable housing in a city that is one top ten markets in the richest country in the world. Go get a job that pays more or commute like the rest of the 7 billion people on the planet. What makes you so special? Go big or go home. That’s life in the city.
For the record, people who used this post to castigate liberals. I'm a liberal. Very, very liberal. What I angers me, is the "smart growth" folks is their insistence that they get affordable housing in Ward 3. There are a lot of less expensive places to live in this city. But you want to live with the other rich white people. Ward 8. PG County, parts of MoCo, have less expensive housing. Buy a condo. DO you know how many families of four are living in a 650 square foot apartments in NYC with hour long commutes on a loud smelly trains? you all need to grow up.
It isn't that the smart growth advocates want the housing for themselves. Most of them live in million + homes. They want affordable housing for their communities because they believe in 1) more density supporting the local retail 2) economic and racial diversity and 3) environmental benefits of having more people live in a compact urban center rather than plowing up more fields for single family homes.
Are you opposed to those three things?
Of course rich people living in $1M homes don't want more SFHs. They don't care what everyone else is left with, especially the poors.
They want more diverse people in their neighborhood, which based on your response, or lack thereof, you are opposed to. And they are fine with people living in SFH, but it is unsustainable to have all of the acres of land just be SFH. So you are basically opposed to the three elements I posted. Fair enough.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t get why people think putting duplexes in is going to result in affordable homes. Do they think a lot that now holds a $1 million house will be torn down and replaced by two houses worth $500k? That’s not actually how the real estate market works. Why would someone tear down’a house for no financial gai n? Some will be made into duplexes and my guess is that each of those two new homes will be sold for about $1.5 -$2.5 million. (Please review DuPont circle condo projects in former SFHs in DuPont Circle) and other SFHs will be torn down and replaced by larger, fancier SFH that will sell for $2-3 million. It’s just a really dumb assumption.
Exactly. The YIMBYs just like deflecting blame from their developer heroes who could be building more housing but aren’t.