Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So what do the Brave girls say about all this? I feel like they must be less happy with these developments.
Why?
Probably feel no different than the McLean-Union girls — same mix of reactions for all.
I would expect brave girls to be much more worried about being cut
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are the boys' divisions of McLean and BRYC underperforming? Despite participation in lower-tier tournaments, both Union and Brave face defeats against average EDP teams, even though these travel programs cost significantly more. It's worth noting that SYC's second team actually outperforms Union, raising the question of whether ECNL boys really offer a superior league. Based on discussions, it appears that major clubs in Northern Virginia participating in ECNL for boys are considering a switch to MLS Next, but they hesitate due to the potential risk of losing their ECNL charter for girls' teams.
Because boys opt for other clubs. SYC now has two MLS Next teams, and it never sent any players of note to Union. SYC is smart to keep the talent and paying families by making two tiers. Other boys who have talent will opt for Arlington or Loudoun if they live W
High school. Most boys play HS soccer which is why they don’t move to MLSNext. The private kids can lie and get waivers— not so with public school kids.
HS soccer is poor quality and injury prone. Lasts 3 months.
Why choose that over MLS Next if you have the quality to make your local MLS Next team?
We have HS soccer to thank for an injury that lasted a full year. Coaches with zero idea of training load or body mechanics. Half the team is injured before the season even starts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So what do the Brave girls say about all this? I feel like they must be less happy with these developments.
Why?
Probably feel no different than the McLean-Union girls — same mix of reactions for all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So what do the Brave girls say about all this? I feel like they must be less happy with these developments.
Why?
Probably feel no different than the McLean-Union girls — same mix of reactions for all.
Anonymous wrote:So what do the Brave girls say about all this? I feel like they must be less happy with these developments.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are the boys' divisions of McLean and BRYC underperforming? Despite participation in lower-tier tournaments, both Union and Brave face defeats against average EDP teams, even though these travel programs cost significantly more. It's worth noting that SYC's second team actually outperforms Union, raising the question of whether ECNL boys really offer a superior league. Based on discussions, it appears that major clubs in Northern Virginia participating in ECNL for boys are considering a switch to MLS Next, but they hesitate due to the potential risk of losing their ECNL charter for girls' teams.
Because boys opt for other clubs. SYC now has two MLS Next teams, and it never sent any players of note to Union. SYC is smart to keep the talent and paying families by making two tiers. Other boys who have talent will opt for Arlington or Loudoun if they live W
High school. Most boys play HS soccer which is why they don’t move to MLSNext. The private kids can lie and get waivers— not so with public school kids.
HS soccer is poor quality and injury prone. Lasts 3 months.
Why choose that over MLS Next if you have the quality to make your local MLS Next team?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are the boys' divisions of McLean and BRYC underperforming? Despite participation in lower-tier tournaments, both Union and Brave face defeats against average EDP teams, even though these travel programs cost significantly more. It's worth noting that SYC's second team actually outperforms Union, raising the question of whether ECNL boys really offer a superior league. Based on discussions, it appears that major clubs in Northern Virginia participating in ECNL for boys are considering a switch to MLS Next, but they hesitate due to the potential risk of losing their ECNL charter for girls' teams.
Because boys opt for other clubs. SYC now has two MLS Next teams, and it never sent any players of note to Union. SYC is smart to keep the talent and paying families by making two tiers. Other boys who have talent will opt for Arlington or Loudoun if they live W
High school. Most boys play HS soccer which is why they don’t move to MLSNext. The private kids can lie and get waivers— not so with public school kids.
HS soccer is poor quality and injury prone. Lasts 3 months.
Why choose that over MLS Next if you have the quality to make your local MLS Next team?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are the boys' divisions of McLean and BRYC underperforming? Despite participation in lower-tier tournaments, both Union and Brave face defeats against average EDP teams, even though these travel programs cost significantly more. It's worth noting that SYC's second team actually outperforms Union, raising the question of whether ECNL boys really offer a superior league. Based on discussions, it appears that major clubs in Northern Virginia participating in ECNL for boys are considering a switch to MLS Next, but they hesitate due to the potential risk of losing their ECNL charter for girls' teams.
Because boys opt for other clubs. SYC now has two MLS Next teams, and it never sent any players of note to Union. SYC is smart to keep the talent and paying families by making two tiers. Other boys who have talent will opt for Arlington or Loudoun if they live W
High school. Most boys play HS soccer which is why they don’t move to MLSNext. The private kids can lie and get waivers— not so with public school kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are the boys' divisions of McLean and BRYC underperforming? Despite participation in lower-tier tournaments, both Union and Brave face defeats against average EDP teams, even though these travel programs cost significantly more. It's worth noting that SYC's second team actually outperforms Union, raising the question of whether ECNL boys really offer a superior league. Based on discussions, it appears that major clubs in Northern Virginia participating in ECNL for boys are considering a switch to MLS Next, but they hesitate due to the potential risk of losing their ECNL charter for girls' teams.
Because boys opt for other clubs. SYC now has two MLS Next teams, and it never sent any players of note to Union. SYC is smart to keep the talent and paying families by making two tiers. Other boys who have talent will opt for Arlington or Loudoun if they live W
Anonymous wrote:Why are the boys' divisions of McLean and BRYC underperforming? Despite participation in lower-tier tournaments, both Union and Brave face defeats against average EDP teams, even though these travel programs cost significantly more. It's worth noting that SYC's second team actually outperforms Union, raising the question of whether ECNL boys really offer a superior league. Based on discussions, it appears that major clubs in Northern Virginia participating in ECNL for boys are considering a switch to MLS Next, but they hesitate due to the potential risk of losing their ECNL charter for girls' teams.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Coaching slots
07/06 - TM
08 - MV
09 - BL
10 - MV
11 - LO
12 - BL
Confirmed ✅
Fixed
Coaching slots
07/06 - McLean
08 - Brave
09 - McLean
10 - McLean
11 - Brave
12 - Brave
Confirmed
Heard this version too.
Anonymous wrote:Unless totally mismanaged their girls’ ECNL team should dominate.
Unclear how GFR fits into this mix. They really should feed into FXU not NVA.
FXU should have several ECNL R teams and arguably could support two ECNL girls team.
I suspect MLS next will dominate in the boys arena.
Boys ECNL may go the way of Girls Academy.