Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let’s be very clear this school board has done severe damage to the kids with special needs during g COVID. The lawsuits spread volumes. Also has anyone gotten notifications from the fentanyl overdoses at our schools. This board has done so much damage to our schools and kids. Reid wants to reimagine everything but what does that mean for our kids future. Their claim to fame is they lowered Thomas Jefferson to 5th rating from the number one school in the country in one year and they opened the bathrooms to both girls and boys and of course tampons in all the boys bathrooms

Completely agree.

Additionally, when they bullied kids into wearing masks long after it was established they were considered medically unnecessary and were no longer a mandate per the Governor of Virginia, the ones more affected by the illegal enforcement of masks were students with special needs. Also, why their silence on the fentanyl crisis that has permeated our schools and has already taken so many young lives across the country?

They aren’t silent on fentanyl.

https://wtop.com/fairfax-county/2023/05/fairfax-co-school-board-approves-plan-to-provide-students-staff-access-to-narcan-in-all-classrooms/

The Fairfax County, Virginia, school board approved a plan Thursday night to provide staff and students with access to fentanyl testing strips and to place Narcan in all classrooms.

The board is also looking at the possibility of creating a special high school for kids to recover from addiction.

The proposal was co-sponsored by school board members Karl Frisch and Laura Jane Cohen.

Do they have money for this? It's a good idea but I don't know how they fund it. Or staff it.

Anonymous wrote:OMG!!!! TAMPONS IN ALL OF THE BOYS BATHROOMS!!!!!! THE HORROR!!!!!!!!!!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:equal rights for others does not mean fewer rights for you. it is not pie.

-my favroite tshirt

But it actually is. There are even physics equations for this.

I'm sorry but just to clarify, you are you under the impression that there are physics equations that apply to an understanding of human rights?

DP, but intuitively everyone understands that there are finite resources, and that spending every last dollar in the name of "equity" to help a child with a particular diagnosis "succeed" means that other children who have not been the subject of a diagnosis may be put at risk of failing.

I gather than some of the Republican candidates have refused to commit unlimited resources to students with certain disabilities before the election. What some activists may see as indifference may well simply be caution. As has been pointed out, Democratic candidates have a track record of making promises they don't keep and commitments they do not honor. It feels good in the moment, but leaves a bitter taste in the mouth.

They can certainly do a better job than the current SB that would encourage parents to homeschool their children they find challenging. They can do better than denying children a year of school.

Competence matter. Rachna is a HR professional, yet we are hemorrhaging teachers leaving the profession.

Karl, doesn’t have a degree, doesn’t practice a trade, isn’t an artist, and most certainly isn’t an athlete.

We’ve seen what these clowns deliver.

Karl's opponent also doesn't have a college degree. In fact Karl is closer to obtaining his college degree than Sabio is.

DP. I think the bigger issue is that Karl has no children. It should be a requirement that all SB candidates/members have children IN that school system.

Karl's opponent also doesnt have a child in FCPS.

Sabio is a father - I don’t know how old his child is, do you?

Not in school. Not that it’s relevant.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let’s be very clear this school board has done severe damage to the kids with special needs during g COVID. The lawsuits spread volumes. Also has anyone gotten notifications from the fentanyl overdoses at our schools. This board has done so much damage to our schools and kids. Reid wants to reimagine everything but what does that mean for our kids future. Their claim to fame is they lowered Thomas Jefferson to 5th rating from the number one school in the country in one year and they opened the bathrooms to both girls and boys and of course tampons in all the boys bathrooms

Completely agree.

Additionally, when they bullied kids into wearing masks long after it was established they were considered medically unnecessary and were no longer a mandate per the Governor of Virginia, the ones more affected by the illegal enforcement of masks were students with special needs. Also, why their silence on the fentanyl crisis that has permeated our schools and has already taken so many young lives across the country?

They aren’t silent on fentanyl.

https://wtop.com/fairfax-county/2023/05/fairfax-co-school-board-approves-plan-to-provide-students-staff-access-to-narcan-in-all-classrooms/

The Fairfax County, Virginia, school board approved a plan Thursday night to provide staff and students with access to fentanyl testing strips and to place Narcan in all classrooms.

The board is also looking at the possibility of creating a special high school for kids to recover from addiction.

The proposal was co-sponsored by school board members Karl Frisch and Laura Jane Cohen.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let’s be very clear this school board has done severe damage to the kids with special needs during g COVID. The lawsuits spread volumes. Also has anyone gotten notifications from the fentanyl overdoses at our schools. This board has done so much damage to our schools and kids. Reid wants to reimagine everything but what does that mean for our kids future. Their claim to fame is they lowered Thomas Jefferson to 5th rating from the number one school in the country in one year and they opened the bathrooms to both girls and boys and of course tampons in all the boys bathrooms

Completely agree.

Additionally, when they bullied kids into wearing masks long after it was established they were considered medically unnecessary and were no longer a mandate per the Governor of Virginia, the ones more affected by the illegal enforcement of masks were students with special needs. Also, why their silence on the fentanyl crisis that has permeated our schools and has already taken so many young lives across the country?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let’s be very clear this school board has done severe damage to the kids with special needs during g COVID. The lawsuits spread volumes. Also has anyone gotten notifications from the fentanyl overdoses at our schools. This board has done so much damage to our schools and kids. Reid wants to reimagine everything but what does that mean for our kids future. Their claim to fame is they lowered Thomas Jefferson to 5th rating from the number one school in the country in one year and they opened the bathrooms to both girls and boys and of course tampons in all the boys bathrooms

Completely agree.

Additionally, when they bullied kids into wearing masks long after it was established they were considered medically unnecessary and were no longer a mandate per the Governor of Virginia, the ones more affected by the illegal enforcement of masks were students with special needs. Also, why their silence on the fentanyl crisis that has permeated our schools and has already taken so many young lives across the

Anonymous wrote:OMG!!!! TAMPONS IN ALL OF THE BOYS BATHROOMS!!!!!! THE HORROR!!!!!!!!!!

Anonymous wrote:Let’s be very clear this school board has done severe damage to the kids with special needs during g COVID. The lawsuits spread volumes. Also has anyone gotten notifications from the fentanyl overdoses at our schools. This board has done so much damage to our schools and kids. Reid wants to reimagine everything but what does that mean for our kids future. Their claim to fame is they lowered Thomas Jefferson to 5th rating from the number one school in the country in one year and they opened the bathrooms to both girls and boys and of course tampons in all the boys bathrooms

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:equal rights for others does not mean fewer rights for you. it is not pie.

-my favroite tshirt

But it actually is. There are even physics equations for this.

I'm sorry but just to clarify, you are you under the impression that there are physics equations that apply to an understanding of human rights?

DP, but intuitively everyone understands that there are finite resources, and that spending every last dollar in the name of "equity" to help a child with a particular diagnosis "succeed" means that other children who have not been the subject of a diagnosis may be put at risk of failing.

I gather than some of the Republican candidates have refused to commit unlimited resources to students with certain disabilities before the election. What some activists may see as indifference may well simply be caution. As has been pointed out, Democratic candidates have a track record of making promises they don't keep and commitments they do not honor. It feels good in the moment, but leaves a bitter taste in the mouth.

They can certainly do a better job than the current SB that would encourage parents to homeschool their children they find challenging. They can do better than denying children a year of school.

Competence matter. Rachna is a HR professional, yet we are hemorrhaging teachers leaving the profession.

Karl, doesn’t have a degree, doesn’t practice a trade, isn’t an artist, and most certainly isn’t an athlete.

We’ve seen what these clowns deliver.

Karl's opponent also doesn't have a college degree. In fact Karl is closer to obtaining his college degree than Sabio is.

DP. I think the bigger issue is that Karl has no children. It should be a requirement that all SB candidates/members have children IN that school system.

Karl's opponent also doesnt have a child in FCPS.

Sabio is a father - I don’t know how old his child is, do you?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:equal rights for others does not mean fewer rights for you. it is not pie.

-my favroite tshirt

But it actually is. There are even physics equations for this.

I'm sorry but just to clarify, you are you under the impression that there are physics equations that apply to an understanding of human rights?

DP, but intuitively everyone understands that there are finite resources, and that spending every last dollar in the name of "equity" to help a child with a particular diagnosis "succeed" means that other children who have not been the subject of a diagnosis may be put at risk of failing.

I gather than some of the Republican candidates have refused to commit unlimited resources to students with certain disabilities before the election. What some activists may see as indifference may well simply be caution. As has been pointed out, Democratic candidates have a track record of making promises they don't keep and commitments they do not honor. It feels good in the moment, but leaves a bitter taste in the mouth.

They can certainly do a better job than the current SB that would encourage parents to homeschool their children they find challenging. They can do better than denying children a year of school.

Competence matter. Rachna is a HR professional, yet we are hemorrhaging teachers leaving the profession.

Karl, doesn’t have a degree, doesn’t practice a trade, isn’t an artist, and most certainly isn’t an athlete.

We’ve seen what these clowns deliver.

Karl's opponent also doesn't have a college degree. In fact Karl is closer to obtaining his college degree than Sabio is.

DP. I think the bigger issue is that Karl has no children. It should be a requirement that all SB candidates/members have children IN that school system.

Karl's opponent also doesnt have a child in FCPS.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:equal rights for others does not mean fewer rights for you. it is not pie.

-my favroite tshirt

But it actually is. There are even physics equations for this.

I'm sorry but just to clarify, you are you under the impression that there are physics equations that apply to an understanding of human rights?

DP, but intuitively everyone understands that there are finite resources, and that spending every last dollar in the name of "equity" to help a child with a particular diagnosis "succeed" means that other children who have not been the subject of a diagnosis may be put at risk of failing.

I gather than some of the Republican candidates have refused to commit unlimited resources to students with certain disabilities before the election. What some activists may see as indifference may well simply be caution. As has been pointed out, Democratic candidates have a track record of making promises they don't keep and commitments they do not honor. It feels good in the moment, but leaves a bitter taste in the mouth.

They can certainly do a better job than the current SB that would encourage parents to homeschool their children they find challenging. They can do better than denying children a year of school.

Competence matter. Rachna is a HR professional, yet we are hemorrhaging teachers leaving the profession.

Karl, doesn’t have a degree, doesn’t practice a trade, isn’t an artist, and most certainly isn’t an athlete.

We’ve seen what these clowns deliver.

Karl's opponent also doesn't have a college degree. In fact Karl is closer to obtaining his college degree than Sabio is.

DP. I think the bigger issue is that Karl has no children. It should be a requirement that all SB candidates/members have children IN that school system.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:equal rights for others does not mean fewer rights for you. it is not pie.

-my favroite tshirt

But it actually is. There are even physics equations for this.

I'm sorry but just to clarify, you are you under the impression that there are physics equations that apply to an understanding of human rights?

Yes. we all live within the parameters of the science of the world and ourselves. The equations we make deal with the environment as well as human behavior and rights we deem appropriate in society.
Laws of energy apply to human rights and behavior just like all other physical laws of the world do.
There are entire fields of study that revolve around this.
Here are some examples:
https://academic.oup.com/mit-press-scholarship-online/book/19055/chapter-abstract/177463481?redirectedFrom=fulltext
https://aeon.co/essays/what-can-a-thermodynamics-of-mind-say-about-how-to-thrive
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3825144/

Anonymous wrote:OMG!!!! TAMPONS IN ALL OF THE BOYS BATHROOMS!!!!!! THE HORROR!!!!!!!!!!