Anonymous wrote:
theoretically this is true if the parents don't do the work for them which is an endemic problem. So fricken obvious when you see some of the projects and writing samples.
Anonymous wrote:Another way to look at the advantage of AAP: rather than accelerated learning, by eliminating the lower 75% of the class (or 85%), the teacher is able to manage the individual learning paces. When the teacher is focused on on ensuring the bottom 20%, they do not have the time for the top 20%.
In AAP, the focus is more on projects, which means the kids to more of the work themselves. With any child in the top 30%, that will work. They get it.
Some might take it further...there is nothing slowing them down.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just FYI about "thriving" in GT. My kid got much lower scores than people are reporting here and yet got all O's last report card, so I just don't buy it that the program is all that specialized for gifted learners. I think people read into it what they want it to be, like religion.
Appealed? What was the total package like?
Scores, GBRS, Report card
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know several parents who had to refer their children to get them into the AAP pool, and a few more who had to appeal. NOT ONE CHILD is doing poorly in the program. In fact the one who had to be referred made the all A honor roll yet again. I also know parents whose child was denied admittance to the program and are not appealing. They know their child best (better than the troll I would think) and knew that they would be better served by the GE classes. I also know of a few parents whose kids WERE accepted into AAP and chose not to pursue it for their child...again, they know their children better than any troll does.
IGNORE the trolls. I know it's hard to talk over them, but replying to anything they say just keeps them going. So don't reply to anything they say. Good Luck to all!
I wish people would stop saying this! There is no one who does poorly in the program. It has somewhat accelerated (differentiated) math; a few more in-depth projects, and maybe more group dicussions, but it is not a quantum leap beyond Gen, Ed. Once snowflake is in, he/she is in there for the duration regardless if where they stand relative to their peers. They don't throw anyone out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:30 kids per class room is the max in FCPS...actually, 31. At 32, they add another class.
just like that huh? Find another classroom, hire another teacher? The center where DC attends is too full already.
Anonymous wrote:Just FYI about "thriving" in GT. My kid got much lower scores than people are reporting here and yet got all O's last report card, so I just don't buy it that the program is all that specialized for gifted learners. I think people read into it what they want it to be, like religion.
Anonymous wrote:30 kids per class room is the max in FCPS...actually, 31. At 32, they add another class.
Anonymous wrote:The AAP program is meant for children whose needs cannot be met in the regular classroom, thus making it the perfect environment for bright students with learning disabilities. My child's classroom contained many 2e students, particularly the boys.
In fact, I was told by the teacher that the program was set up for exactly that student profile, since they were the ones to have the most trouble in the regular classroom. The well behaved, organized bright student doesn't really need a specialized classroom to be successful, but the 2e child truly needs the teacher who has the training to work with gifted students. This child will get lost in a regular classroom, but will learn and grow in a place that "gets" that extremely bright students may need to learn in different ways.