Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The person holding the gun when it goes off is ultimately responsible for what happens.
NO ONE should be let off the hook because they relied on someone else to check to see if the gun is safe. Had this been ANYONE in the "real" world that this happened to, the person holding the gun is responsible for that death and that injury. I can't go to court and say, "my buddy told me it was unloaded right before I killed that person" and be let off the hook.
It wasn’t the real world. It was a movie set.
Then why Harvey in jail? If he raped women not in real world, but in a movie set, he should not be even prosecuted.
Anonymous wrote:She looks awful here:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10130717/amp/The-armorer-set-Rust-Baldwin-killed-cinematographer-pictured-home.html
Anonymous wrote:She looks awful here:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10130717/amp/The-armorer-set-Rust-Baldwin-killed-cinematographer-pictured-home.html
Anonymous wrote:She looks awful here:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10130717/amp/The-armorer-set-Rust-Baldwin-killed-cinematographer-pictured-home.html
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Alec Baldwin is a criminal, as things seem to be.
You've mixed him up with his character. Learn to separate fiction from reality.
The reality is Baldwin pulled the trigger of the pistol that killed an innocent woman.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Alec Baldwin is a criminal, as things seem to be.
You've mixed him up with his character. Learn to separate fiction from reality.
Anonymous wrote:Alec Baldwin is a criminal, as things seem to be.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The person holding the gun when it goes off is ultimately responsible for what happens.
NO ONE should be let off the hook because they relied on someone else to check to see if the gun is safe. Had this been ANYONE in the "real" world that this happened to, the person holding the gun is responsible for that death and that injury. I can't go to court and say, "my buddy told me it was unloaded right before I killed that person" and be let off the hook.
It wasn’t the real world. It was a movie set.
Ok, so anything goes on a movie set then. No rules, no consequences. I was not aware of that fact.
You don’t have to wallow in ignorance. The protocols for firearms on movie sets are not hard to find.
Do they override the first rule of handling a gun?
No, which is why the armorer is potentially in big trouble. "Willful disregard".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Um, if you're Alec Baldwin, you can do anything in MN.
Wrong state.
Dyslexia. Sorry!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The person holding the gun when it goes off is ultimately responsible for what happens.
NO ONE should be let off the hook because they relied on someone else to check to see if the gun is safe. Had this been ANYONE in the "real" world that this happened to, the person holding the gun is responsible for that death and that injury. I can't go to court and say, "my buddy told me it was unloaded right before I killed that person" and be let off the hook.
It wasn’t the real world. It was a movie set.
Ok, so anything goes on a movie set then. No rules, no consequences. I was not aware of that fact.
You don’t have to wallow in ignorance. The protocols for firearms on movie sets are not hard to find.
Do they override the first rule of handling a gun?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The person holding the gun when it goes off is ultimately responsible for what happens.
NO ONE should be let off the hook because they relied on someone else to check to see if the gun is safe. Had this been ANYONE in the "real" world that this happened to, the person holding the gun is responsible for that death and that injury. I can't go to court and say, "my buddy told me it was unloaded right before I killed that person" and be let off the hook.
It wasn’t the real world. It was a movie set.
Ok, so anything goes on a movie set then. No rules, no consequences. I was not aware of that fact.
You don’t have to wallow in ignorance. The protocols for firearms on movie sets are not hard to find.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Um, if you're Alec Baldwin, you can do anything in MN.
Wrong state.