Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I support Ukraine and I’m happy that we’re giving them some money and supplies, and frankly I think we should probably just let them use our weapons to strike all military targets in Russia no matter how “deep” they are, but can someone please explain to me why we’re giving more $$$ than countries like Germany and France who are much closer? We’re on the other side of the world and I doubt the leaders in Europe are giving much to support Latin American countries like we do. Like I said, I’m happy to give some, but I feel like what we give should be (in absolute terms) far less than what countries in Europe are giving. And yes if that means European countries need to scale back their social welfare programs or other domestic spending in order to pay for it or go into debt then that’s what they should do. There should be more responsibility to look after the situation in your own backyard. We’re not the blank check for the entire world, especially when our government is increasing our already insanely high debt in order to pay for it.
We pay for it because we're the only ones that want this war. Everyone else wanted business as usual with Russia to come back ASAP. So much so that we, er someone, had to blow those pipes to Germany to keep them from getting any ideas. Whatever European enthusiasm for the war there was, has largely burnt out.
Ukraine is pretty much out of men now anyway, so it doesn't really matter what we send them.
Anonymous wrote:I support Ukraine and I’m happy that we’re giving them some money and supplies, and frankly I think we should probably just let them use our weapons to strike all military targets in Russia no matter how “deep” they are, but can someone please explain to me why we’re giving more $$$ than countries like Germany and France who are much closer? We’re on the other side of the world and I doubt the leaders in Europe are giving much to support Latin American countries like we do. Like I said, I’m happy to give some, but I feel like what we give should be (in absolute terms) far less than what countries in Europe are giving. And yes if that means European countries need to scale back their social welfare programs or other domestic spending in order to pay for it or go into debt then that’s what they should do. There should be more responsibility to look after the situation in your own backyard. We’re not the blank check for the entire world, especially when our government is increasing our already insanely high debt in order to pay for it.
Anonymous wrote:Ew, it’s the bloodthirsty boomercon again. You pop up every time this thread is on life support.
Ukrainian lives don’t matter and apparently neither does their country’s sovereign wealth of critical minerals. You must own some BlackRock and Monsanto too.
https://www.rferl.org/a/ukraine-military-manpower-crisis-pressgang-recruitment/33161193.html
Those forced conscription clips are tragic.
Never any diplomacy happening but plenty of signed bombs. Theatre of the absurd
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Im still holding my breath. WOW I wonder what all these billions could do abroad our own country.
These billions make the entire world safer for Americans. Money well spent.
Anonymous wrote:Im still holding my breath. WOW I wonder what all these billions could do abroad our own country.
Anonymous wrote:There we go. ANOTHER 20 Billion.![]()
US Plans To Contribute $20 Bn For Ukraine Loan: Yellen
The United States plans to contribute $20 billion to a G7 loan package for Ukraine and could soon announce new sanctions targeting Russian weapons procurement, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said Tuesday.
"We're very close to finalizing America's portion of this $50 billion loan package," she told a press conference, as world financial leaders gather in Washington for the annual meetings of the International Monetary Fund and World Bank.
G7 leaders are close to finalizing the plan, with policymakers set to meet later this week.
https://www.barrons.com/news/us-to-impose-strong-new-sanctions-aimed-at-russia-yellen-349e0394
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This war seems unsustainable for Russia. They are winning tactical victories at the front but Ukraine seems to now be making more strategic victories, like blowing up Russian stockpiles of newly-bought Iranian Shaheeds, North Korean rockets and ammunition, and so on. So not only is Russia being depleted at its sources of existing weaponry, their newly purchased replacement weaponry is also fast going up in smoke. Not to mention, that Ukraine has now shown it can precisely find and target those ammunition stockpiles at remote Russian airfields and warehouses, hundreds of miles from the border.
Tactical victories of a few KM will become meaningless if suddenly Russian artillery no longer has shells and rockets to hold it or to continue advances.
Russia has been running out of ammo for two years straight now.