Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump is on record as saying Epstein was a creep, and not allowed as his properties, before it all came out. I’m no Trump fan, but he was not his friend.

There are many photos of the two of them hanging out together though…

They went to the same parties. Doesn’t mean they are friends.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Aaron Parnas:

Important update: Major criminal investigation opened after Epstein files released as Trump asks public to move on:

Human trafficking investigation opened in Lithuania.

Poland investigates Epstein’s ties to Russia.

DOJ caught redacting Melania Trump’s face. Trump judge caught in Epstein files.

Spread the word: https://open.substack.com/pub/aaronparnas/p/important-update-major-human-trafficking?r

The Western Press Are Trying To Spin Epstein As A RUSSIAN Agent

This is of course ridiculous. Epstein is a known intelligence operative for the state of Israel, not Russia. This is an established fact, and has been for some time.

Epstein documents have been confirming for months that he was clearly and undeniably an Israeli intelligence operative, which the latest round of releases have strongly reinforced. So naturally the western media are running with the story that Epstein worked for Vladimir Putin.

https://caitlinjohnstone.com.au/2026/02/03/the-western-press-are-trying-to-spin-epstein-as-a-russian-agent/

The main thing to focus on right now is justice for the victims of sexual assault and trafficking. And obviously, pedophilia. There's plenty of time to trace back which governments benefited from and manipulated this information. For now, eyes on the prize: getting the criminals brought to justice.

Anonymous wrote:Here's a gift link to the article by the NY Times about the nude photos posted by the DOJ.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/01/us/nude-photos-epstein-files.html?unlocked_article_code=1.JlA.pp0P.BCvWEUJeloSL&smid=url-share

How on earth can we possibly prosecute child pornographers if our DOJ is so careless as to publish these photos (which were not previously on the internet) themselves.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are literally pictures of toddlers bound. Its insanity

You have the link?
Because I don’t believe you.

You're asking the PP to post child porn?

The NY Times has confirmed that victims' photos were published by the DOJ without even their faces redacted, as if that is enough..

I wasn’t.
I just wanted a source for this.
There is a lot of information.

Well, if it's important to you to find out if that's really out there, then I guess you'll have to google that. But I wouldn't.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are literally pictures of toddlers bound. Its insanity

You have the link?
Because I don’t believe you.

You're asking the PP to post child porn?

The NY Times has confirmed that victims' photos were published by the DOJ without even their faces redacted, as if that is enough..

I wasn’t.
I just wanted a source for this.
There is a lot of information.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are literally pictures of toddlers bound. Its insanity

You have the link?
Because I don’t believe you.

You're asking the PP to post child porn?

The NY Times has confirmed that victims' photos were published by the DOJ without even their faces redacted, as if that is enough..

Anonymous wrote:Here's a gift link to the article by the NY Times about the nude photos posted by the DOJ.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/01/us/nude-photos-epstein-files.html?unlocked_article_code=1.JlA.pp0P.BCvWEUJeloSL&smid=url-share

How on earth can we possibly prosecute child pornographers if our DOJ is so careless as to publish these photos (which were not previously on the internet) themselves.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are literally pictures of toddlers bound. Its insanity

You have the link?
Because I don’t believe you.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ummmm they ate him! They were impregnating the girls and taking the babies

Why though? For what purpose? Are they schizophrenic?

Adenochrome. Its in the files. They are worshipping Moloch and sacrificing them. jE even writes in his emails that “newborns taste like cream cheese”. Its absolutely insane and horrifying.

Its all there.

This is ridiculous and absurd. Who is Moloch? This is so stupid.

It's absolutely stupid until you find out that Epstein started /poI/ on 4chan and Maxwell was a reddit supermod on /worldnews.

All the craziest dumbass internet conspiracies of the past decade tie back to freaking Epstein and Maxwell. It's utterly insane but true. The penultimate red pill.

Anonymous wrote:There are literally pictures of toddlers bound. Its insanity