Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Congress never presented Trump with a bill to sign. the gang of six represented only themselves, not a majority much less 60 votes in the Senate. All the Senate needs to do is get 60 votes to pass what passed in the House but Schumer picked the wrong hill to die on with this manufactured crisis. All trump needs to do is wait and schumer will have to cave. After all most of those furloughed bureaucrats are democrats. Schumer needs to cut a deal with McConnell that will get 60 and trump will sign it. Trump needs to do no heavy lifting on this at all. He can just wait until the dems cave. They will.

Schumer definitely manufactured this crisis. I suspect he wanted to throw a wrench in the works, deflect from all the positive economic good news, and bring more negative press (that's not hard to do) onto Trump.

DACA should NEVER have been part of a government funding bill.

I don’t know how you haven’t noticed, but no one's biting on your sad little line. The GOP is dirty and sucks at governing. To your next point ("but we keep winning!"), if you can’t do it without cheating, you can’t do it at all.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Congress never presented Trump with a bill to sign. the gang of six represented only themselves, not a majority much less 60 votes in the Senate. All the Senate needs to do is get 60 votes to pass what passed in the House but Schumer picked the wrong hill to die on with this manufactured crisis. All trump needs to do is wait and schumer will have to cave. After all most of those furloughed bureaucrats are democrats. Schumer needs to cut a deal with McConnell that will get 60 and trump will sign it. Trump needs to do no heavy lifting on this at all. He can just wait until the dems cave. They will.

Schumer definitely manufactured this crisis. I suspect he wanted to throw a wrench in the works, deflect from all the positive economic good news, and bring more negative press (that's not hard to do) onto Trump.

DACA should NEVER have been part of a government funding bill.

Exactly.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Congress never presented Trump with a bill to sign. the gang of six represented only themselves, not a majority much less 60 votes in the Senate. All the Senate needs to do is get 60 votes to pass what passed in the House but Schumer picked the wrong hill to die on with this manufactured crisis. All trump needs to do is wait and schumer will have to cave. After all most of those furloughed bureaucrats are democrats. Schumer needs to cut a deal with McConnell that will get 60 and trump will sign it. Trump needs to do no heavy lifting on this at all. He can just wait until the dems cave. They will.

Schumer definitely manufactured this crisis. I suspect he wanted to throw a wrench in the works, deflect from all the positive economic good news, and bring more negative press (that's not hard to do) onto Trump.

DACA should NEVER have been part of a government funding bill.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Congress never presented Trump with a bill to sign. the gang of six represented only themselves, not a majority much less 60 votes in the Senate. All the Senate needs to do is get 60 votes to pass what passed in the House but Schumer picked the wrong hill to die on with this manufactured crisis. All trump needs to do is wait and schumer will have to cave. After all most of those furloughed bureaucrats are democrats. Schumer needs to cut a deal with McConnell that will get 60 and trump will sign it. Trump needs to do no heavy lifting on this at all. He can just wait until the dems cave. They will.

Schumer definitely manufactured this crisis. I suspect he wanted to throw a wrench in the works, deflect from all the positive economic good news, and bring more negative press (that's not hard to do) onto Trump.

DACA should NEVER have been part of a government funding bill.

Anonymous wrote:Congress never presented Trump with a bill to sign. the gang of six represented only themselves, not a majority much less 60 votes in the Senate. All the Senate needs to do is get 60 votes to pass what passed in the House but Schumer picked the wrong hill to die on with this manufactured crisis. All trump needs to do is wait and schumer will have to cave. After all most of those furloughed bureaucrats are democrats. Schumer needs to cut a deal with McConnell that will get 60 and trump will sign it. Trump needs to do no heavy lifting on this at all. He can just wait until the dems cave. They will.

Anonymous wrote:Congress never presented Trump with a bill to sign. the gang of six represented only themselves, not a majority much less 60 votes in the Senate. All the Senate needs to do is get 60 votes to pass what passed in the House but Schumer picked the wrong hill to die on with this manufactured crisis. All trump needs to do is wait and schumer will have to cave. After all most of those furloughed bureaucrats are democrats. Schumer needs to cut a deal with McConnell that will get 60 and trump will sign it. Trump needs to do no heavy lifting on this at all. He can just wait until the dems cave. They will.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Congress spent TWO MONTHS talking about how big to make the corporate tax cuts instead of figuring out how to fund the government and make sure we didn't needlessly punish 800,000 young people in America, and then went on vacation for a month?

Yep, they made the issue: they broke DACA, they didn't fund CHIP; despite promises, the GOP owns this.

Awwwww....are we "punishing" illegal immigrants by not giving into the demands for amnesty? They have had the benefit of K-12 education, paid for by American taxpayers, and have been allowed to remain here thanks to our generosity. So how do they show their appreciation? By shouting profanity-laced demands at a high-ranking Congressperson (who is in their side)!

No....I feel that we should not be punishing law-abiding workers by cutting off their paychecks. The fact that the D's are holding the government hostage over these DACA kids is shameful. They, and apparently you, have more sympathy for them than they do for the hundreds of thousands of employees who will have financial hardship as a result. (I noticed you didn't say anything about punishing Americans.)

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Heroes

Senators Grassley, Cotton, and Perdue penned an oped for The Hill earlier this week, highlighting the negative impacts of mass immigration driven by extended-family Chain Migration.

[Chain Migration] has spurred a wave of mostly unskilled immigration into our country...

This policy puts downward pressure on the wages of people who toil with their hands, who work on their feet. Americans with high school-level educations have seen their wages fall by 2 percent since the 1970s, while inflation has made the cost of living even higher. For Americans who haven't finished high school, it's even worse. Their wages have fallen by nearly 20 percent.

Why is supply and demand ignored when you are low skilled workers????

Educated elites say f’ck you

So why does Trump's resorts and R farmers keep hiring low skilled foreign workers, some who probably overstay their work visas and become illegal immigrants.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You’re either for those breaking the law or you are against them. Trump is against illegals. Thank you Donald!!!!!

Except the DACA kids did not break the law. Their parents did.

And that means they get benefits American citizens don't get, because?

Which benefits are those?

In state tuition in Massachusetts.

American citizens don't get in state tuition in MA? Like no American citizen gets it?

Most of them don't. Only the ones who are MA residents do. That's a very small number, and it does not include PP. Or my kids, either.

Your and PP's kids still won't get in state tuition in MA if DACA kids get deported.

Better chance.

Unless you are another educated elite that thinks money grows On trees

With your attitude I am surprised you want your children to get a college degree-they will then become educated “elites”
UMass accepts applications from undocumented students. They are treated as international students and so not receive in state tuition. DACA recipients who are also MA residents are treated like any other MA resident.

Anonymous wrote:Congress spent TWO MONTHS talking about how big to make the corporate tax cuts instead of figuring out how to fund the government and make sure we didn't needlessly punish 800,000 young people in America, and then went on vacation for a month?

Yep, they made the issue: they broke DACA, they didn't fund CHIP; despite promises, the GOP owns this.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You’re either for those breaking the law or you are against them. Trump is against illegals. Thank you Donald!!!!!

Except the DACA kids did not break the law. Their parents did.

And that means they get benefits American citizens don't get, because?

Which benefits are those?

In state tuition in Massachusetts.

American citizens don't get in state tuition in MA? Like no American citizen gets it?

Most of them don't. Only the ones who are MA residents do. That's a very small number, and it does not include PP. Or my kids, either.

Your and PP's kids still won't get in state tuition in MA if DACA kids get deported.

Better chance.

Unless you are another educated elite that thinks money grows On trees

Anonymous wrote:Read the article about negotiating with Jello. It is spot on. Trump said in the staged White House meeting that he wanted to deal with DACA, that he would sign a bill with love that dealt with the issues.

Graham-Durbin checked the boxes that the president requested.

The president rejected the proposal.

Schumer gave more than Graham-Durbin and the president agreed. Until he didn't.

Now the GOP is taking a hard line of no negotiations until the democrats agree to fund the government. That is NOT what the President said on live television on January 9th.

When the goalposts keep getting moved, you cannot negotiate in good faith. At this point, even Graham and other GOP are frustrated because the took the high road and negotiated in good faith to arrive at an acceptable solution only to be Giloolied by Trump.

By the same token, McConnell could easily have brought Graham-Durbin to the floor and put the issue at the feet of the President, but McConnell wasn't willing to do that either.

So no, at this point, regardless of the core issues, this all falls squarely on the GOP who control all three players in this and have a responsibility to be good actors in running our government.

The majority of Americans see through this and it will only make things worse as the GOP digs in.