Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:this year is across the board better than the five year averageAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder if you should have done this with last year's data. This year is still coming in. I know Regis, for example, hasn't posted a kid who got into Harvard.
HYPS is weird, no? Isn't it usually HYPSM?
Most of the schools post 5 year matriculation on their websites. That would be the most fulsome data.
Anyone knows why ?
Every university in America is financially struggling right now and every TT/2T/3T has an abundance of families that can help with that problem.
Schools with $10BN+ endowments aren't financially struggling.
Actually they are; they're generally extremely limited in what they can do with most of that endowment money and they're neither willing nor able to dip into it to sustain operations. And in general, the richer the university, the more money they're getting from research grants and the more eager the current administration is to hurt them by cutting those.
The vast majority of them will be fine.
Even Harvard is sending out cost-cutting memos; the fact that they'll be "fine" does not mean they're not looking to tighten up their finances a bit, and in the current climate, letting in an extra 50 barely-qualified rich white kids a year for a few years will not cause any legal or reputational issues and is vastly preferable to more permanent measures like closing a department.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:this year is across the board better than the five year averageAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder if you should have done this with last year's data. This year is still coming in. I know Regis, for example, hasn't posted a kid who got into Harvard.
HYPS is weird, no? Isn't it usually HYPSM?
Most of the schools post 5 year matriculation on their websites. That would be the most fulsome data.
Anyone knows why ?
Every university in America is financially struggling right now and every TT/2T/3T has an abundance of families that can help with that problem.
Schools with $10BN+ endowments aren't financially struggling.
Actually they are; they're generally extremely limited in what they can do with most of that endowment money and they're neither willing nor able to dip into it to sustain operations. And in general, the richer the university, the more money they're getting from research grants and the more eager the current administration is to hurt them by cutting those.
The vast majority of them will be fine.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Only these schools changed adding MIT: Spence +1, Dalton +1, Regis +2, Hunter +2, Fieldston +1.
Also added Hunter, Browning, and Dwight-Englewood
School (N): Ivy+WASP; H/Y/P/S/M; Ivy+
Brearley (46): 36 (78%); 14 (30%); 32 (70%)
Spence (64): 41 (64%); 12 (19%); 38 (59%)
Chapin (52): 32 (62%); 6 (12%); 28 (54%)
Dalton (59): 33 (56%); 13 (22%); 32 (54%)
Saint Ann's (73): 36 (49%); 7 (10%); 27 (37%)
Horace Mann (131): 64 (49%); 6 (5%); 63 (48%)
Trinity (109): 52 (48%); 13 (12%); 49 (45%)
Regis (79): 35 (44%); 6 (8%); 29 (37%)
Nightingale (57): 24 (42%); 1 (2%); 22 (39%)
Riverdale (128): 53 (41%); 11 (9%); 48 (38%)
Hunter (114): 46 (40%); 12 (11%); 42 (37%)
Browning (27): 10 (37%); 2 (7%); 10 (37%)
Packer (92): 28 (30%); 3 (3%); 23 (25%)
Fieldston (141): 42 (30%); 12 (9%); 40 (28%)
Friends Seminary (39): 11 (28%); 2 (5%); 10 (26%)
CGPS (119): 32 (27%); 3 (3%); 28 (24%)
Dwight-Englewood (124): 31 (25%); 8 (6%); 28 (23%)
Avenues (91): 21 (23%); 4 (4%); 20 (22%)
Trevor (87): 16 (18%); 1 (1%); 16 (18%)
Berkeley Carroll (77): 14 (18%); 0 (0%); 9 (12%)
Poly Prep (123): 22 (18%); 2 (2%); 22 (18%)
Grace Church (80): 14 (18%); 1 (1%); 13 (16%)
Sacred Heart (61): 10 (16%); 2 (3%); 10 (16%)
Marymount (70): 8 (11%); 1 (1%); 7 (10%)
Brooklyn Friends (48): 5 (10%); 0 (0%); 3 (6%)
H/Y/P/S/M = Harvard + Yale + Princeton + Stanford + MIT
Ivy+ = Ivy League + Stanford + MIT + Caltech + UChicago + Duke + Johns Hopkins + Northwestern + Vanderbilt
Ivy+WASP = Ivy+ + Williams + Amherst + Swarthmore + Pomona
Do people still consider Sacred Heart and Marymount T2 schools? Their matriculation aren't even close to Fieldston.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:this year is across the board better than the five year averageAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder if you should have done this with last year's data. This year is still coming in. I know Regis, for example, hasn't posted a kid who got into Harvard.
HYPS is weird, no? Isn't it usually HYPSM?
Most of the schools post 5 year matriculation on their websites. That would be the most fulsome data.
Anyone knows why ?
Every university in America is financially struggling right now and every TT/2T/3T has an abundance of families that can help with that problem.
Schools with $10BN+ endowments aren't financially struggling.
Then I’m curious to see how top Specialized High Schools are doing this year compared to Private schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:this year is across the board better than the five year averageAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder if you should have done this with last year's data. This year is still coming in. I know Regis, for example, hasn't posted a kid who got into Harvard.
HYPS is weird, no? Isn't it usually HYPSM?
Most of the schools post 5 year matriculation on their websites. That would be the most fulsome data.
Anyone knows why ?
Every university in America is financially struggling right now and every TT/2T/3T has an abundance of families that can help with that problem.
Schools with $10BN+ endowments aren't financially struggling.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:this year is across the board better than the five year averageAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder if you should have done this with last year's data. This year is still coming in. I know Regis, for example, hasn't posted a kid who got into Harvard.
HYPS is weird, no? Isn't it usually HYPSM?
Most of the schools post 5 year matriculation on their websites. That would be the most fulsome data.
Anyone knows why ?
Every university in America is financially struggling right now and every TT/2T/3T has an abundance of families that can help with that problem.
Schools with $10BN+ endowments aren't financially struggling.
Actually they are; they're generally extremely limited in what they can do with most of that endowment money and they're neither willing nor able to dip into it to sustain operations. And in general, the richer the university, the more money they're getting from research grants and the more eager the current administration is to hurt them by cutting those.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:this year is across the board better than the five year averageAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder if you should have done this with last year's data. This year is still coming in. I know Regis, for example, hasn't posted a kid who got into Harvard.
HYPS is weird, no? Isn't it usually HYPSM?
Most of the schools post 5 year matriculation on their websites. That would be the most fulsome data.
Anyone knows why ?
Every university in America is financially struggling right now and every TT/2T/3T has an abundance of families that can help with that problem.
Schools with $10BN+ endowments aren't financially struggling.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:this year is across the board better than the five year averageAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder if you should have done this with last year's data. This year is still coming in. I know Regis, for example, hasn't posted a kid who got into Harvard.
HYPS is weird, no? Isn't it usually HYPSM?
Most of the schools post 5 year matriculation on their websites. That would be the most fulsome data.
Anyone knows why ?
Every university in America is financially struggling right now and every TT/2T/3T has an abundance of families that can help with that problem.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:this year is across the board better than the five year averageAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder if you should have done this with last year's data. This year is still coming in. I know Regis, for example, hasn't posted a kid who got into Harvard.
HYPS is weird, no? Isn't it usually HYPSM?
Most of the schools post 5 year matriculation on their websites. That would be the most fulsome data.
Anyone knows why ?
Anonymous wrote:this year is across the board better than the five year averageAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder if you should have done this with last year's data. This year is still coming in. I know Regis, for example, hasn't posted a kid who got into Harvard.
HYPS is weird, no? Isn't it usually HYPSM?
Most of the schools post 5 year matriculation on their websites. That would be the most fulsome data.
this year is across the board better than the five year averageAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder if you should have done this with last year's data. This year is still coming in. I know Regis, for example, hasn't posted a kid who got into Harvard.
HYPS is weird, no? Isn't it usually HYPSM?
Most of the schools post 5 year matriculation on their websites. That would be the most fulsome data.