Anonymous wrote:1 SJC. Agree but need to fix the culture to meet expectations.
2 Landon . Will be better than you think
3 Prep. Will Hilgy get the 5 star to play team ball?
4 GC . Is the defense up to the task?
5 Gonzaga. Is this the worst Gonzaga team in the last 15 years?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Seems like SJC has got to do it this year . . . Loaded 26 and 27 classes. Now or never Cadets!
Isn’t this the same loaded team that lost to Ryken?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The portal was dry as a bone this year for lacrosse. Maybe softball's different, but it's not the landscape it was several years ago when covid year eligibility was rampant.Anonymous wrote:One of the things that will impact lots of recruiting moving forward with be portal (more so) and roster limits.
While, I firmly believe roster limits are a walking antitrust violation it is the current world these kids are living in. Add in the portal and many of the kids not quite at the top of the star rankings are going to see soft offers and communication - one of the reasons is that they'll be competing against 22-24 year old college kids for spots.
Anecdotal evidence to be sure but I was told by friend that the word on the street for softball is unless you are 5 star don't expect any offers on September 1st - maybe they'll start trickling in late fall. They were told that many schools will be looking at their current holes during fall practice and fill in via the portal - then they recruit for what they need 2 years down the road.
It was not as robust as the post Covid years but it was still a part of the recruiting dynamic. Do you think the kid from UVA moved over to Duke on some whim? Or the best FOGO by raw percentages last year go to UMd. There was easily 50-60 transfers via the portal this summer. It will only grow as kids see an advantage in moving to a different school.
I wouldn't be the least surprised that kids will ladder up through programs based on their prior year's performance. Add in roster caps for most programs, then coaches will be looking to fill open spots with men that can immediately contribute and not wait on a kid to fill that spot a couple of years. So yes, the portal is going to soften HS recruiting - at least for juniors and programs will likely look for post junior year recruits to fill spots.
Anonymous wrote:The portal was dry as a bone this year for lacrosse. Maybe softball's different, but it's not the landscape it was several years ago when covid year eligibility was rampant.Anonymous wrote:One of the things that will impact lots of recruiting moving forward with be portal (more so) and roster limits.
While, I firmly believe roster limits are a walking antitrust violation it is the current world these kids are living in. Add in the portal and many of the kids not quite at the top of the star rankings are going to see soft offers and communication - one of the reasons is that they'll be competing against 22-24 year old college kids for spots.
Anecdotal evidence to be sure but I was told by friend that the word on the street for softball is unless you are 5 star don't expect any offers on September 1st - maybe they'll start trickling in late fall. They were told that many schools will be looking at their current holes during fall practice and fill in via the portal - then they recruit for what they need 2 years down the road.
Anonymous wrote:Seems like SJC has got to do it this year . . . Loaded 26 and 27 classes. Now or never Cadets!
Anonymous wrote:The last 3 are nothing beyond normal in lacrosse. probably 40-50% or more in the top 1/3 of division 1 are 1 year holdbacks. June 07 is more than a little nutz if it's anything but a PG.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just looked at some of the ages of the 4 star players from IL My goodness you got some old kids!
Birthdays in June 07, Jan 08, March 08, Nov 07 to name a few on the list. And if any local kid goes up North to a prep school, book it he is a year back, at a minimum.
I guess…if you must in order to compete…
Facts. It is crazy, but reality.