Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And just as we expected, the forced birther trash in government is investigating the doctor who provided the 10 year old with her life saving abortion.

https://apnews.com/article/indiana-abortion-ohio-girl-raped-caitlin-bernard-4de25dd09f61fbaed4a83bce34d7fa83

Forced birthers are monsters and there is nothing that is too far for them. Remember earlier in this thread when they thought it was made up?

She should be able to prove everything she says, right? Because there should be records

There are records and they've proven her side of the story.

But the extremists in power want to punish her for letting this story be known to the public. They are trying to strip her of her license.

Even if she wins, this case of persecution is a signal to doctors everywhere that extremists in power are ready to go after them for helping women in need. So expect way more stories of women experiencing crisis pregnancies who cannot get the health care they require because the OBs and their hospitals don't want to be targeted by the extremist anti-abortionists.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2023/05/25/caitlin-bernard-indiana-abortion-rape-victim/?utm_campaign=wp_main&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter

Indiana’s medical licensing board will determine as soon as Thursday whether to take any disciplinary action against a doctor who made headlines last year for performing an abortion for a 10-year-old Ohio rape victim, after the state’s antiabortion attorney general alleged the doctor violated ethical standards and state reporting laws.

Indiana’s Republican Attorney General Todd Rokita for nearly a year has pursued punishment for Caitlin Bernard, an OB/GYN and an assistant professor at the Indiana University School of Medicine who performed the abortion in June 2022, less than a week after Roe v. Wade was struck down, enacting trigger laws.

The stakes of Thursday’s hearing are significant for Bernard, whose lawyers have refuted Rokita’s allegations as baseless and politically motivated. The seven-member board of governor appointees can, by a majority vote, either take no action against Bernard or impose a range of disciplinary measures up to and including the immediate termination of Bernard’s medical license.

If people continue to vote for pro-lifers, why should anyone care they have complications and are shocked that their situation isn't different?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And just as we expected, the forced birther trash in government is investigating the doctor who provided the 10 year old with her life saving abortion.

https://apnews.com/article/indiana-abortion-ohio-girl-raped-caitlin-bernard-4de25dd09f61fbaed4a83bce34d7fa83

Forced birthers are monsters and there is nothing that is too far for them. Remember earlier in this thread when they thought it was made up?

She should be able to prove everything she says, right? Because there should be records

There are records and they've proven her side of the story.

But the extremists in power want to punish her for letting this story be known to the public. They are trying to strip her of her license.

Even if she wins, this case of persecution is a signal to doctors everywhere that extremists in power are ready to go after them for helping women in need. So expect way more stories of women experiencing crisis pregnancies who cannot get the health care they require because the OBs and their hospitals don't want to be targeted by the extremist anti-abortionists.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2023/05/25/caitlin-bernard-indiana-abortion-rape-victim/?utm_campaign=wp_main&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter

Indiana’s medical licensing board will determine as soon as Thursday whether to take any disciplinary action against a doctor who made headlines last year for performing an abortion for a 10-year-old Ohio rape victim, after the state’s antiabortion attorney general alleged the doctor violated ethical standards and state reporting laws.

Indiana’s Republican Attorney General Todd Rokita for nearly a year has pursued punishment for Caitlin Bernard, an OB/GYN and an assistant professor at the Indiana University School of Medicine who performed the abortion in June 2022, less than a week after Roe v. Wade was struck down, enacting trigger laws.

The stakes of Thursday’s hearing are significant for Bernard, whose lawyers have refuted Rokita’s allegations as baseless and politically motivated. The seven-member board of governor appointees can, by a majority vote, either take no action against Bernard or impose a range of disciplinary measures up to and including the immediate termination of Bernard’s medical license.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And just as we expected, the forced birther trash in government is investigating the doctor who provided the 10 year old with her life saving abortion.

https://apnews.com/article/indiana-abortion-ohio-girl-raped-caitlin-bernard-4de25dd09f61fbaed4a83bce34d7fa83

Forced birthers are monsters and there is nothing that is too far for them. Remember earlier in this thread when they thought it was made up?

She should be able to prove everything she says, right? Because there should be records

Indiana’s medical licensing board will determine as soon as Thursday whether to take any disciplinary action against a doctor who made headlines last year for performing an abortion for a 10-year-old Ohio rape victim, after the state’s antiabortion attorney general alleged the doctor violated ethical standards and state reporting laws.

Indiana’s Republican Attorney General Todd Rokita for nearly a year has pursued punishment for Caitlin Bernard, an OB/GYN and an assistant professor at the Indiana University School of Medicine who performed the abortion in June 2022, less than a week after Roe v. Wade was struck down, enacting trigger laws.

The stakes of Thursday’s hearing are significant for Bernard, whose lawyers have refuted Rokita’s allegations as baseless and politically motivated. The seven-member board of governor appointees can, by a majority vote, either take no action against Bernard or impose a range of disciplinary measures up to and including the immediate termination of Bernard’s medical license.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And just as we expected, the forced birther trash in government is investigating the doctor who provided the 10 year old with her life saving abortion.

https://apnews.com/article/indiana-abortion-ohio-girl-raped-caitlin-bernard-4de25dd09f61fbaed4a83bce34d7fa83

Forced birthers are monsters and there is nothing that is too far for them. Remember earlier in this thread when they thought it was made up?

She should be able to prove everything she says, right? Because there should be records

Yes. However, the legal ramifications will be far reaching in creating fear among providers and limiting ANY OB care in states that are aggressive in their approach to physicians. Insurance is already prohibitively expensive for OB providers.

Exactly. And then when OB's won't perform abortions that might technically come within one of the "exceptions," they will refuse to make the connection.

What OBs? These states will not be attracting OBs to set up their practices.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And just as we expected, the forced birther trash in government is investigating the doctor who provided the 10 year old with her life saving abortion.

https://apnews.com/article/indiana-abortion-ohio-girl-raped-caitlin-bernard-4de25dd09f61fbaed4a83bce34d7fa83

Forced birthers are monsters and there is nothing that is too far for them. Remember earlier in this thread when they thought it was made up?

She should be able to prove everything she says, right? Because there should be records

Yes. However, the legal ramifications will be far reaching in creating fear among providers and limiting ANY OB care in states that are aggressive in their approach to physicians. Insurance is already prohibitively expensive for OB providers.

Exactly. And then when OB's won't perform abortions that might technically come within one of the "exceptions," they will refuse to make the connection.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And just as we expected, the forced birther trash in government is investigating the doctor who provided the 10 year old with her life saving abortion.

https://apnews.com/article/indiana-abortion-ohio-girl-raped-caitlin-bernard-4de25dd09f61fbaed4a83bce34d7fa83

Forced birthers are monsters and there is nothing that is too far for them. Remember earlier in this thread when they thought it was made up?

She should be able to prove everything she says, right? Because there should be records

Yes. However, the legal ramifications will be far reaching in creating fear among providers and limiting ANY OB care in states that are aggressive in their approach to physicians. Insurance is already prohibitively expensive for OB providers.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And just as we expected, the forced birther trash in government is investigating the doctor who provided the 10 year old with her life saving abortion.

https://apnews.com/article/indiana-abortion-ohio-girl-raped-caitlin-bernard-4de25dd09f61fbaed4a83bce34d7fa83

Forced birthers are monsters and there is nothing that is too far for them. Remember earlier in this thread when they thought it was made up?

She should be able to prove everything she says, right? Because there should be records

Anonymous wrote:And just as we expected, the forced birther trash in government is investigating the doctor who provided the 10 year old with her life saving abortion.

https://apnews.com/article/indiana-abortion-ohio-girl-raped-caitlin-bernard-4de25dd09f61fbaed4a83bce34d7fa83

Forced birthers are monsters and there is nothing that is too far for them. Remember earlier in this thread when they thought it was made up?

Anonymous wrote:Just endless desperate BS from Rokita

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, now medical records shouldn’t be private?

Bring on the records of all the male politicians with penile implants

Doctor acted as an activist to the media, additional complaints were filed. If a doctor doing penile implants started behaving like an activist, I say yes, bring on the records.

DP.. Do you think a dr who is trying to help a child is an activity? Really? I don't. If my child was raped and needed an abortion, I would not consider the dr who is helping my child to be an activist.

IMO people like you are politicizing medical care. Rs want a death panel. They want to review all the decisions made by a dr. They want more regulation and police medical care. They are fascists.

The doctor touts herself as an activist

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, now medical records shouldn’t be private?

Bring on the records of all the male politicians with penile implants

Doctor acted as an activist to the media, additional complaints were filed. If a doctor doing penile implants started behaving like an activist, I say yes, bring on the records.

You have no right to see a child’s private medical records you pervert.

The only perverts here is the mother’s boyfriend who raped her and the mother, who defended him

And people like you PP by extension. You are a pervert gazer wanting to seek and peak at this child and others misfortunes. Disgusting.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'd rather a doctor, an activist or not, be the one to make health decisions with me, not a politician, and certainly not a male politician.

Stay the F* out of my business. I thought the Rs supported limited government and staying out of people's personal business.

For men. But women aren’t people in the GOP, so getting up in a woman (or girl’s) uterus is great according to them.