Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no plot to sabotage in-person learning by infecting everyone with covid. Are you Tucker Carlson? Because you sound like him, sad crazy provocateur person.
What there is, is some epic failure and miscommunication on so many levels and everywhere.
If by sabotage you mean hold people accountable for sickness then yes. People should be getting tested so schools can stay open.
Of course, you're holding everyone else in the quarantined class "accountable" as well...
Stopping the spread? Yes
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no plot to sabotage in-person learning by infecting everyone with covid. Are you Tucker Carlson? Because you sound like him, sad crazy provocateur person.
What there is, is some epic failure and miscommunication on so many levels and everywhere.
If by sabotage you mean hold people accountable for sickness then yes. People should be getting tested so schools can stay open.
Of course, you're holding everyone else in the quarantined class "accountable" as well...
Stopping the spread? Yes
How many students will have to stay home in Zoom school, per each "spread" prevented? If 10 students have to stay home in Zoom school unnecessarily, is that too many? How about 20? 50? 100?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no plot to sabotage in-person learning by infecting everyone with covid. Are you Tucker Carlson? Because you sound like him, sad crazy provocateur person.
What there is, is some epic failure and miscommunication on so many levels and everywhere.
If by sabotage you mean hold people accountable for sickness then yes. People should be getting tested so schools can stay open.
Of course, you're holding everyone else in the quarantined class "accountable" as well...
Stopping the spread? Yes
How many students will have to stay home in Zoom school, per each "spread" prevented? If 10 students have to stay home in Zoom school unnecessarily, is that too many? How about 20? 50? 100?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no plot to sabotage in-person learning by infecting everyone with covid. Are you Tucker Carlson? Because you sound like him, sad crazy provocateur person.
What there is, is some epic failure and miscommunication on so many levels and everywhere.
If by sabotage you mean hold people accountable for sickness then yes. People should be getting tested so schools can stay open.
Of course, you're holding everyone else in the quarantined class "accountable" as well...
Stopping the spread? Yes
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no plot to sabotage in-person learning by infecting everyone with covid. Are you Tucker Carlson? Because you sound like him, sad crazy provocateur person.
What there is, is some epic failure and miscommunication on so many levels and everywhere.
No other district in the country is sending kids home this way. Not in a conservative-located district, nor a liberal-located district. MoCo/MCPS is not smarter than everybody else. In fact, all we've seen is the opposite from the very beginning. Classrooms/kids will be inappropriately held hostage waiting for a single person to get tested (or not). This is terrible, operationally-asinine policy. Yes, they are actively sabotaging in-person.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no plot to sabotage in-person learning by infecting everyone with covid. Are you Tucker Carlson? Because you sound like him, sad crazy provocateur person.
What there is, is some epic failure and miscommunication on so many levels and everywhere.
No other district in the country is sending kids home this way. Not in a conservative-located district, nor a liberal-located district. MoCo/MCPS is not smarter than everybody else. In fact, all we've seen is the opposite from the very beginning. Classrooms/kids will be inappropriately held hostage waiting for a single person to get tested (or not). This is terrible, operationally-asinine policy. Yes, they are actively sabotaging in-person.
Anonymous wrote:There is no plot to sabotage in-person learning by infecting everyone with covid. Are you Tucker Carlson? Because you sound like him, sad crazy provocateur person.
What there is, is some epic failure and miscommunication on so many levels and everywhere.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no plot to sabotage in-person learning by infecting everyone with covid. Are you Tucker Carlson? Because you sound like him, sad crazy provocateur person.
What there is, is some epic failure and miscommunication on so many levels and everywhere.
If by sabotage you mean hold people accountable for sickness then yes. People should be getting tested so schools can stay open.
Of course, you're holding everyone else in the quarantined class "accountable" as well...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no plot to sabotage in-person learning by infecting everyone with covid. Are you Tucker Carlson? Because you sound like him, sad crazy provocateur person.
What there is, is some epic failure and miscommunication on so many levels and everywhere.
If by sabotage you mean hold people accountable for sickness then yes. People should be getting tested so schools can stay open.
Anonymous wrote:My kid has been occasionally coughing with runny nose for more than 1 month daily, how often should I get her tested for school's comfort level and not going to get the whole class quarantined? Do I have to get her tested weekly for the same symptom? The doctor says it is a cold, but it may take 6-12 weeks for coughing and runny nose to completely stop. She is well rested during the long weekend, but still the coughing and runny nose continues.
She is unvaccinated (too young), and that is not allergy or asthma. Teacher or school never asks me to get her tested, but I have already got her tested twice (before day 1 start & today for this week school).
Anonymous wrote:There is no plot to sabotage in-person learning by infecting everyone with covid. Are you Tucker Carlson? Because you sound like him, sad crazy provocateur person.
What there is, is some epic failure and miscommunication on so many levels and everywhere.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder how people will be able to get rapid tests?
FWIW, my kid woke up vomiting at 1:30am, and I tried to find a rapid test appointment in MoCo through cvs today but none are available.
Are we spiking, or is it always tough to get a test when you need one?
I think it’s always tough, especially for kids. Try a pediatric urgent care or your ped’s office.
Our ped will do a virtual visit this morning to determine if testing is needed, but the results aren’t guaranteed today (it’s a 24 hour window).
^^^
This is why parents will send their kid to school if they look/feel/act fine.
If it’s impossible to get a same day rapid test at cvs, etc. then how will the mcps policy work? It’s likely most people won’t be able to get same day results. I tried looking for an appointment at 2am, and I couldn’t find anything.
Now you're starting to understand why it was a bad idea for MCPS to re-open in-person.
Go to the CVS at 360 Hungerford Dr.. As of this morning, it says that there are still home testing kits available there. Home tests give more false positives, but it's better than nothing while you try to arrange a PCR. Good luck.
Anonymous wrote:
Now you're starting to understand why it was a bad idea for MCPS to re-open in-person.
Go to the CVS at 360 Hungerford Dr.. As of this morning, it says that there are still home testing kits available there. Home tests give more false positives, but it's better than nothing while you try to arrange a PCR. Good luck.