Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This generation is lucky to have avoided public school. It will be better educated by staying home and away from the confused and psychologically impaired school systems.
Sure. Anything's possible. Kids could benefit from not being educated for 18 months+. Why not?
They can learn more and be safer from Sesame Street, discovery, nat geo, Fox business and YouTube math tutorials. It’s a great opportunity to rid our nation of the sloppy, chaotic and dangerous publics.
But the kids aren't doing that...
That’s the parents fault.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This generation is lucky to have avoided public school. It will be better educated by staying home and away from the confused and psychologically impaired school systems.
Sure. Anything's possible. Kids could benefit from not being educated for 18 months+. Why not?
They can learn more and be safer from Sesame Street, discovery, nat geo, Fox business and YouTube math tutorials. It’s a great opportunity to rid our nation of the sloppy, chaotic and dangerous publics.
But the kids aren't doing that...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This generation is lucky to have avoided public school. It will be better educated by staying home and away from the confused and psychologically impaired school systems.
Sure. Anything's possible. Kids could benefit from not being educated for 18 months+. Why not?
They can learn more and be safer from Sesame Street, discovery, nat geo, Fox business and YouTube math tutorials. It’s a great opportunity to rid our nation of the sloppy, chaotic and dangerous publics.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This generation is lucky to have avoided public school. It will be better educated by staying home and away from the confused and psychologically impaired school systems.
Sure. Anything's possible. Kids could benefit from not being educated for 18 months+. Why not?
Anonymous wrote:This generation is lucky to have avoided public school. It will be better educated by staying home and away from the confused and psychologically impaired school systems.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
It means less people breathing in the same physical space. So the “ambient air” should be safer. It’s also easier for contact tracing.
I know it won’t happen, so we’re staying home.
I wish nothing but the best for the teachers and students that are heading back.
Logistically, that just means you want concurrent/hybrid, which isn't going to happen for a myriad of other reasons.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m highly debating just pulling my ES child out and planning to homeschool the first quarter.
Unless I see a better plan to keep kids safe that are months(possibly weeks) away from being vaccinated, I’m not sending him.
Was your ES in school in spring?
Are you able to keep your ES kid in an environment with < 2% spread?
I hope that ES maintains the low transmission rate from the spring when there was distancing. Looking at what is happening in school districts in the south that mandate masks, I’m not confident. And FCPS’ plan is masks and vaccines. So for the ES kids, that’s just masks. And not social distancing while eating or snack.
The FDA is supposed to announce a plan for boosters next week.
They don’t really learn much the first quarter anyways. Hopefully I’m wrong and my kid will be able to rejoin school in October.
At this point, it’s not worth it for one
Fun fact: there was not actually much distancing in ES. Many teachers on here have confirmed this was true at multiple schools. It just wasn't possible.
-classroom monitor
I believe you.
However, schools were not full, many only had 30% of their normal population in person on any given day.
Where I was we were 60% full. Lunch was a cafeteria of 100 kids.
It's been a normal year that would be 300+ kids in that cafeteria.
That can't be right. That would mean our school only had 2 lunch periods. Maybe in HS?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m highly debating just pulling my ES child out and planning to homeschool the first quarter.
Unless I see a better plan to keep kids safe that are months(possibly weeks) away from being vaccinated, I’m not sending him.
Was your ES in school in spring?
Are you able to keep your ES kid in an environment with < 2% spread?
I hope that ES maintains the low transmission rate from the spring when there was distancing. Looking at what is happening in school districts in the south that mandate masks, I’m not confident. And FCPS’ plan is masks and vaccines. So for the ES kids, that’s just masks. And not social distancing while eating or snack.
The FDA is supposed to announce a plan for boosters next week.
They don’t really learn much the first quarter anyways. Hopefully I’m wrong and my kid will be able to rejoin school in October.
At this point, it’s not worth it for one
Fun fact: there was not actually much distancing in ES. Many teachers on here have confirmed this was true at multiple schools. It just wasn't possible.
-classroom monitor
I believe you.
However, schools were not full, many only had 30% of their normal population in person on any given day.
Where I was we were 60% full. Lunch was a cafeteria of 100 kids.
It's been a normal year that would be 300+ kids in that cafeteria.
That can't be right. That would mean our school only had 2 lunch periods. Maybe in HS?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m highly debating just pulling my ES child out and planning to homeschool the first quarter.
Unless I see a better plan to keep kids safe that are months(possibly weeks) away from being vaccinated, I’m not sending him.
Was your ES in school in spring?
Are you able to keep your ES kid in an environment with < 2% spread?
I hope that ES maintains the low transmission rate from the spring when there was distancing. Looking at what is happening in school districts in the south that mandate masks, I’m not confident. And FCPS’ plan is masks and vaccines. So for the ES kids, that’s just masks. And not social distancing while eating or snack.
The FDA is supposed to announce a plan for boosters next week.
They don’t really learn much the first quarter anyways. Hopefully I’m wrong and my kid will be able to rejoin school in October.
At this point, it’s not worth it for one
Fun fact: there was not actually much distancing in ES. Many teachers on here have confirmed this was true at multiple schools. It just wasn't possible.
-classroom monitor
I believe you.
However, schools were not full, many only had 30% of their normal population in person on any given day.
Where I was we were 60% full. Lunch was a cafeteria of 100 kids.
It's been a normal year that would be 300+ kids in that cafeteria.
Anonymous wrote:
It means less people breathing in the same physical space. So the “ambient air” should be safer. It’s also easier for contact tracing.
I know it won’t happen, so we’re staying home.
I wish nothing but the best for the teachers and students that are heading back.