Anonymous wrote:I don't understand how anyone could allow Josh access to kids with only his wife supervising. She will do and say whatever her husband tells her to, she has to "keep sweet." I wonder if it would even occur to Anna that she might need to protect her kids from their dad.

Those poor kids.

Anonymous wrote:He's clearly going to prison. What the heck is Anna going to do with seven kids? Although he probably wasn't much help anyway...

Anonymous wrote:He's clearly going to prison. What the heck is Anna going to do with seven kids? Although he probably wasn't much help anyway...

Anonymous wrote:I don't understand how anyone could allow Josh access to kids with only his wife supervising. She will do and say whatever her husband tells her to, she has to "keep sweet." I wonder if it would even occur to Anna that she might need to protect her kids from their dad.

Those poor kids.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I predict Oprah will do an interview very soon with Jill and Derrick.

LOL try Dr. Phil

Anonymous wrote:I predict Oprah will do an interview very soon with Jill and Derrick.

Anonymous wrote:I predict Oprah will do an interview very soon with Jill and Derrick.

Anonymous wrote:In Josh's cult, he, the husband, is the head of the family. He "leads" the wife; he is literally in control of Anna. She can't tell him what to do and she has been trained from birth to be subservient to the desires and directives of her father and husband.

So how can it be acceptable to the judge that Josh may see his children, under the condition that Anna, the wife he literally controls and leads in his religion, is present?

Anna must be "joyfully available" whenever her husband wants sex: she can't refuse. Michelle blathers about this all the time.

So how can Anna possibly function as a safeguard for her children in Josh's presence?

It makes no sense.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think he's the type to try to kill himself. Too defended, unlikely to feel shame, too smug. I think he would kill the wife before he would kill himself honestly. And in a way, he has. He is a pos.

He seems to have the same smug above all rules personality as Epstein. Who would of that Epstein would kill himself?

Anonymous wrote:I don't think he's the type to try to kill himself. Too defended, unlikely to feel shame, too smug. I think he would kill the wife before he would kill himself honestly. And in a way, he has. He is a pos.

Anonymous wrote:This is the worst kind of crime. I’m so disgusted and heartbroken for the child victims. I find it unfathomable that he is out on bail and still has unlimited access to his kids, as long as his wife is present. I mean—I feel sort of bad for his wife, but if he’s known about these charges for so long, she had to have some knowledge as well, so it’s hard to see her as anything but complicit. I don’t think that she can be trusted as the only other adult present when he’s with his kids.
My other fear is that, with him out on bail, he is a suicide risk. If he were in jail, they could keep him alive until his trial, and they might be able to get information from him that could lead to finding other perpetrators. I’m no attorney or judge, but it seems mind-boggling to me that this guy was eligible for bond.