Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Many McLean neighbors don’t support this for valid reasons. If the MCCA members want to live in a exclusive club, go ahead and live on Entitlement Fantasy Island. Access is by boat only.
It would be more like living in a place where you know where you could would attend school and the schools would actually be maintained than an exclusive club, but if you want to keep being a doormat there is no shortage of people in the county who will gladly take your money and spend it to benefit anyone other than kids in McLean and Great Falls. Or upzone your neighborhood to allow for greater density while doing nothing to plan ahead for the additional infrastructure this necessitates.
I used to think spreading all the resources around the county was better, but having seen just how little attention those in control of FCPS pay to our kids and schools compared to those in other parts of the county I’ve concluded One Fairfax is a sham.
You sound ridiculous. This is what it's like living in NoVa supporting the rest of the state. Living in CA ad NY, supporting the rest of rural states. This is how it works in America. You're free to move.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Many McLean neighbors don’t support this for valid reasons. If the MCCA members want to live in a exclusive club, go ahead and live on Entitlement Fantasy Island. Access is by boat only.
It would be more like living in a place where you know where you could would attend school and the schools would actually be maintained than an exclusive club, but if you want to keep being a doormat there is no shortage of people in the county who will gladly take your money and spend it to benefit anyone other than kids in McLean and Great Falls. Or upzone your neighborhood to allow for greater density while doing nothing to plan ahead for the additional infrastructure this necessitates.
I used to think spreading all the resources around the county was better, but having seen just how little attention those in control of FCPS pay to our kids and schools compared to those in other parts of the county I’ve concluded One Fairfax is a sham.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm the pp who pointed out the tax base issue wrt commercial taxes. Sorry, maybe I wasn't clear - I don't think this makes everything cost prohibitive. You can make it work. But it's a safe assumption that the property tax rate will need to increase by a substantial amount. Most NOVA jurisdictions tax at roughly 1% of assessed value, with commercial taxes providing roughly 40-60% of the tax base (outside of purely bedroom communities)
I think a new residential property tax rate of 1.5-2.5% is within reason. So for a million dollar house that is an extra $10k a year in taxes. It's easy to see why people might be hesitant
The rate in FCC - which operates a school system and provides other city services with a population under 15,000, is 1.355%. A new jurisdiction in northern Fairfax would have at least 4X that many people and include more expensive properties.
But that 1.355% is only because FCC already owns its school buildings and the land that they sit on. McLean would have to spend many millions to buy its schools and the land they sit on from Ffx Cty before it could charge the 1.355% (or similar) rate.
+1
And it doesn’t stop with the schools: Park land, library buildings, other county-owned property. These are the kind of expensive details conveniently overlooked or forgotten.
All negotiable. The county would be relieved from the expense of maintaining the properties and providing services to those using them.
For just McLean HS alone, the bill would be $43 million dollars up front, according to the assessment, assuming it was sold at fair value. Now, add at least 2 or 3 elementary schools, at least 1 or 2 middle schools, a police station, a library, a courthouse, some parks, etc. That’s an awful lot of start-up taxes the residents of McLean would have to pony up to secede.
MAP #: 0304 01 0019
SCHOOL BOARD OF FAIRFAX COUNTY 1633 DAVIDSON RD
Values
Tax Year 2020
Current Land $25,636,000
Current Building $17,686,880
Current Assessed Total $43,322,880
Tax Exempt YES
Note
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Falls Church City says otherwise. It’s a smaller jurisdiction than a new McLean City would be and people move into FCC to avoid the horrible bureaucracy and mismanagement of FCPS.
Either McLean and Great Falls organize hard to separate from FCPS or they watch their communities deteriorate as FCPS lets McLean HS stagnate and eventually finds a way to shovel 1/2 of Great Falls out of Langley HS into Herndon HS. Lackluster do-nothing elected officials like John Foust and Elaine Tholen won’t do a thing for us and, even if they had a backbone, they’d get steamrolled by those in control of FC/FCPS now - a coalition of SJWs and pork-barrel politicians from southern Fairfax United in their desire to deliver as few services to Great Falls and McLean as possible, but more than happy to take our tax dollars.
Yowza. I'd hate to live in your mind or household.
I’m sorry for your children, too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm the pp who pointed out the tax base issue wrt commercial taxes. Sorry, maybe I wasn't clear - I don't think this makes everything cost prohibitive. You can make it work. But it's a safe assumption that the property tax rate will need to increase by a substantial amount. Most NOVA jurisdictions tax at roughly 1% of assessed value, with commercial taxes providing roughly 40-60% of the tax base (outside of purely bedroom communities)
I think a new residential property tax rate of 1.5-2.5% is within reason. So for a million dollar house that is an extra $10k a year in taxes. It's easy to see why people might be hesitant
The rate in FCC - which operates a school system and provides other city services with a population under 15,000, is 1.355%. A new jurisdiction in northern Fairfax would have at least 4X that many people and include more expensive properties.
But that 1.355% is only because FCC already owns its school buildings and the land that they sit on. McLean would have to spend many millions to buy its schools and the land they sit on from Ffx Cty before it could charge the 1.355% (or similar) rate.
+1
And it doesn’t stop with the schools: Park land, library buildings, other county-owned property. These are the kind of expensive details conveniently overlooked or forgotten.
All negotiable. The county would be relieved from the expense of maintaining the properties and providing services to those using them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Many McLean neighbors don’t support this for valid reasons. If the MCCA members want to live in a exclusive club, go ahead and live on Entitlement Fantasy Island. Access is by boat only.
It would be more like living in a place where you know where you could would attend school and the schools would actually be maintained than an exclusive club, but if you want to keep being a doormat there is no shortage of people in the county who will gladly take your money and spend it to benefit anyone other than kids in McLean and Great Falls. Or upzone your neighborhood to allow for greater density while doing nothing to plan ahead for the additional infrastructure this necessitates.
I used to think spreading all the resources around the county was better, but having seen just how little attention those in control of FCPS pay to our kids and schools compared to those in other parts of the county I’ve concluded One Fairfax is a sham.
+100
Well said. I think the people claiming to live in McLean and saying they’re against this are just trolls. What, exactly, would be the downside?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Many McLean neighbors don’t support this for valid reasons. If the MCCA members want to live in a exclusive club, go ahead and live on Entitlement Fantasy Island. Access is by boat only.
It would be more like living in a place where you know where you could would attend school and the schools would actually be maintained than an exclusive club, but if you want to keep being a doormat there is no shortage of people in the county who will gladly take your money and spend it to benefit anyone other than kids in McLean and Great Falls. Or upzone your neighborhood to allow for greater density while doing nothing to plan ahead for the additional infrastructure this necessitates.
I used to think spreading all the resources around the county was better, but having seen just how little attention those in control of FCPS pay to our kids and schools compared to those in other parts of the county I’ve concluded One Fairfax is a sham.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm the pp who pointed out the tax base issue wrt commercial taxes. Sorry, maybe I wasn't clear - I don't think this makes everything cost prohibitive. You can make it work. But it's a safe assumption that the property tax rate will need to increase by a substantial amount. Most NOVA jurisdictions tax at roughly 1% of assessed value, with commercial taxes providing roughly 40-60% of the tax base (outside of purely bedroom communities)
I think a new residential property tax rate of 1.5-2.5% is within reason. So for a million dollar house that is an extra $10k a year in taxes. It's easy to see why people might be hesitant
The rate in FCC - which operates a school system and provides other city services with a population under 15,000, is 1.355%. A new jurisdiction in northern Fairfax would have at least 4X that many people and include more expensive properties.
But that 1.355% is only because FCC already owns its school buildings and the land that they sit on. McLean would have to spend many millions to buy its schools and the land they sit on from Ffx Cty before it could charge the 1.355% (or similar) rate.
+1
And it doesn’t stop with the schools: Park land, library buildings, other county-owned property. These are the kind of expensive details conveniently overlooked or forgotten.
All negotiable. The county would be relieved from the expense of maintaining the properties and providing services to those using them.
Anonymous wrote:Many McLean neighbors don’t support this for valid reasons. If the MCCA members want to live in a exclusive club, go ahead and live on Entitlement Fantasy Island. Access is by boat only.
Anonymous wrote:Many McLean neighbors don’t support this for valid reasons. If the MCCA members want to live in a exclusive club, go ahead and live on Entitlement Fantasy Island. Access is by boat only.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are people assuming McLean is some fount of massive tax revenue? At least in Arlington the residential areas are all cost centers. The county budget gets almost half its revenue from commercial taxes. McLean is woefully short on retail and commercial centers and lacks the big employment centers that Arlington has. I'm not seeing where McLean gets the funding it needs unless they raise property taxes to 2-3%
Clearly you don’t realize that half of Tysons Corner is in McLean.
Lol. Half of Tysons has a McLean mailing address. That doesn’t mean half of Tysons is in McLean. McLean itself (at best) is arbitrarily defined by the U.S. Census Bureau. The lines currently run along the Dulles Access Road and Spring Hill Road, and doesn’t include any part of the Tysons CBD.
The PP is right. The McLean area does not have a strong commercial tax base. In the unlikely event that it would succeed in incorporating as a separate city (and forget any wild fantasy that McLean could somehow grab part of Tysons), the new city would be overly reliant upon residential property taxes - much more so than Fairfax County as a whole.
FCC isn't exactly Wall Street, and it gets by as an independent jurisdiction. McLean has more expensive residential properties than FCC, and its retail/commercial area is concentrated in a core area that in the aggregate is larger than the commercial area along Broad Street.
As for the residential population, for sure there are a lot of families with children (indeed, the desire for more control over schools that get ignored and left to run on auto-pilot by FCPS is one driver of the initiative to explore incorporation), but it also has singles in apartment buildings in downtown McLean and on the edge of Tysons, as well as older residents who no longer have school-age children.
So I don't think the inability to include the Tysons core in a new jurisdiction would be a show-stopper. You really need to let those who want to explore this see what they can come up. The effort to pre-emptively claim it would be cost-prohibitive is premature and does seem to reflect a desire to keep McLean's tax base within the county or opposition on the part of some to higher taxes. If there were a case that we'd get better schools and services in exchange for higher taxes, I'd gladly pay more in taxes, as would many others.
Well, I live in McLean and I don't support this. And I know others who live in McLean that don't support it as well.
DP. Ok? There are plenty of people living in McLean who *would* support it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are people assuming McLean is some fount of massive tax revenue? At least in Arlington the residential areas are all cost centers. The county budget gets almost half its revenue from commercial taxes. McLean is woefully short on retail and commercial centers and lacks the big employment centers that Arlington has. I'm not seeing where McLean gets the funding it needs unless they raise property taxes to 2-3%
Clearly you don’t realize that half of Tysons Corner is in McLean.
Lol. Half of Tysons has a McLean mailing address. That doesn’t mean half of Tysons is in McLean. McLean itself (at best) is arbitrarily defined by the U.S. Census Bureau. The lines currently run along the Dulles Access Road and Spring Hill Road, and doesn’t include any part of the Tysons CBD.
The PP is right. The McLean area does not have a strong commercial tax base. In the unlikely event that it would succeed in incorporating as a separate city (and forget any wild fantasy that McLean could somehow grab part of Tysons), the new city would be overly reliant upon residential property taxes - much more so than Fairfax County as a whole.
FCC isn't exactly Wall Street, and it gets by as an independent jurisdiction. McLean has more expensive residential properties than FCC, and its retail/commercial area is concentrated in a core area that in the aggregate is larger than the commercial area along Broad Street.
As for the residential population, for sure there are a lot of families with children (indeed, the desire for more control over schools that get ignored and left to run on auto-pilot by FCPS is one driver of the initiative to explore incorporation), but it also has singles in apartment buildings in downtown McLean and on the edge of Tysons, as well as older residents who no longer have school-age children.
So I don't think the inability to include the Tysons core in a new jurisdiction would be a show-stopper. You really need to let those who want to explore this see what they can come up. The effort to pre-emptively claim it would be cost-prohibitive is premature and does seem to reflect a desire to keep McLean's tax base within the county or opposition on the part of some to higher taxes. If there were a case that we'd get better schools and services in exchange for higher taxes, I'd gladly pay more in taxes, as would many others.
Well, I live in McLean and I don't support this. And I know others who live in McLean that don't support it as well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The MCA (and GFCA) have a lot of members with the skill set to map out what the potential budgets might look like. There are some services that might require higher spending than average in the county, but also others where a new jurisdiction could operate more leanly and certainly more efficiently than the county and FCPS.
LMAO.
+1
Running a citizens’ association and a city are entirely different. And this post clearly demonstrates how clueless some of my fellow McLean neighbors are. Perhaps well-intentioned, but utterly clueless.
What bothers you is that they aren’t clueless. For whatever reason, you prefer the idea of an area that’s captive to a massive county that provides the community with poor services and unresponsive government in exchange for its tax dollars.