In truth, though, the United States has never done well on international tests, and they are not good predictors of our national success. Since 1964, when the first such exam was administered to 13-year-olds in 12 countries, America has lagged behind its peers, rarely rising above the middle of the pack and doing particularly poorly in science and math. And yet over these past five decades, that same laggard country has dominated the world of science, technology, research and innovation.
Consider the same pattern in two other highly innovative countries, Sweden and Israel. Israel ranks first in the world in venture-capital investments as a percentage of GDP; the United States ranks second, and Sweden is sixth, ahead of Great Britain and Germany. These nations do well by most measures of innovation, such as research and development spending and the number of high-tech companies as a percent of all public companies. Yet all three countries fare surprisingly poorly in the OECD rankings. Sweden and Israel performed even worse than the United States on the 2012 assessment, landing overall at 28th and 29th, respectively, among the 34 most-developed economies.
But other than bad test-takers, their economies have a few important traits in common: They are flexible. Their work cultures are non-hierarchical and merit-based. All operate like "young" countries, with energy and dynamism. All three are open societies, happy to let in the world's ideas, goods and services. And people in all three nations are confident — a characteristic that can be measured. Despite ranking 27th and 30th in math, respectively, American and Israeli students came out at the top in their belief in their math abilities, if one tallies up their responses to survey questions about their skills. Sweden came in seventh, even though its math ranking was 28th.
The tests are a requirement of the No Child Left Behind Act. This requirement existed before the Common Core standards were developed, and it exists in states that did not adopt the Common Core standards as well as in states that have disadopted the Common Core standards. If all of the states disadopted the Common Core standards tomorrow, the testing requirement would still exist. If you don't like the tests -- that is not a Common Core issue. It's a No Child Left Behind Act issue.
These standards are going to make little difference in raising everyone up. The standards are too narrow and they force everyone into the same classes.
Everyone learns so differently and has such different strengths. That was always America's greatness. It doesn't really matter if a ballerina can do calculus. Should she be blocked from pursuing the arts because her math skills aren't in the top 10 percent? Should she be blocked from going to college because she's not a STEM fanatic?
The should bring back vocational schools and drop the idea of everyone being at exactly the same place at the same time academically.
Anonymous wrote:
Unfortunately, it is my child that is paying the price. Common Core sucks for him, and all the children like him. They are the collateral damage and a sacrificial population is this stupid scheme.
Hope you are proud of yourself for promoting an educational gimmick that so profoundly harms so many.
Anonymous wrote:
You're the bomb!!! You're running circles around the CC lover. He loves those tests like his life depended on them. So sad.
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
And the anti-CCers are starting to let slip through the cracks the truth that it's all about the union... or in the case of the Tea Party wackadoo, that it's all about right wing politics...
If you don't understand that there are a lot of politics behind Common Core on both the left and the right, then I feel sorry for you.
LOL! Sorry, NO. I've been saying from the start that the opposition is mainly all about politics as opposed to it being about education. And finally you've come around to admitting it.
Anonymous wrote:
Billions can be saved by not giving these tests at all. I know that's unthinkable for the federales. Their heads might explode if we don't have all this testing.
Billions could be saved by just shutting schools down altogether since you obviously don't give a shit about outcomes.
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
To the apologist, if this many people/schools have "local" problems then it's a federal problem.
Who the FUCK do you see here "apologizing?"
NOBODY. You are DELUSIONAL.
To the illiterate, answer the following questions:
1. What is the definition of "apologist" in this thread?
a. Someone who apologizes
b. An asshole who makes excuses for a certain doctrine or ideological position
c. The name of an Olympic speed skater from Seattle
d. the wooden mallet used in the game of polo
2. Cite evidence from the text in this thread to support your answer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And the anti-CCers are starting to let slip through the cracks the truth that it's all about the union... or in the case of the Tea Party wackadoo, that it's all about right wing politics...
If you don't understand that there are a lot of politics behind Common Core on both the left and the right, then I feel sorry for you.
LOL! Sorry, NO. I've been saying from the start that the opposition is mainly all about politics as opposed to it being about education. And finally you've come around to admitting it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And the anti-CCers are starting to let slip through the cracks the truth that it's all about the union... or in the case of the Tea Party wackadoo, that it's all about right wing politics...
If you don't understand that there are a lot of politics behind Common Core on both the left and the right, then I feel sorry for you.
Anonymous wrote:And the anti-CCers are starting to let slip through the cracks the truth that it's all about the union... or in the case of the Tea Party wackadoo, that it's all about right wing politics...