Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LOL! The faux hysteria about Jones is off the rails this morning.
Jones is 100000% a better choice than the Trump-humping Miyares.
One party ends wars and frees hostages the other party celebrates and encourages murder of even of young children. Easy choice to make.
From a peer review study on Trump’s cuts to US aid. “Forecasting models predicted that the current steep funding cuts could result in more than 14 051 750 (uncertainty interval 8 475 990–19 662 191) additional all-age deaths, including 4 537 157 (3 124 796–5 910 791) in children younger than age 5 years, by 2030.”
From https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(25)01186-9/fulltext
Yep, ~4.5 million children dying by 2030 as a result of this administration’s cuts in aid. Tell me again how Trump is a humanitarian? Remind me again how much you care about children’s lives?
US children?
Are you seriously asking if dying children are from the US or not?
Much like Jay Jones, the deaths of children don't matter to me as long as it advances my policy positions.
Seriously, the republicans have no floor. You think millions of children dying as a result of your policies is funny, then complain that the dems hurt your feelings by calling you bad people.
When I see dumb comments like this I think back and wonder what happened to the hundreds of thousands of migrant children the Biden administration lost.
What? This from the party that cheers as ICE rips families apart? All of a sudden you care about the welfare of immigrant families?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LOL! The faux hysteria about Jones is off the rails this morning.
Jones is 100000% a better choice than the Trump-humping Miyares.
One party ends wars and frees hostages the other party celebrates and encourages murder of even of young children. Easy choice to make.
From a peer review study on Trump’s cuts to US aid. “Forecasting models predicted that the current steep funding cuts could result in more than 14 051 750 (uncertainty interval 8 475 990–19 662 191) additional all-age deaths, including 4 537 157 (3 124 796–5 910 791) in children younger than age 5 years, by 2030.”
From https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(25)01186-9/fulltext
Yep, ~4.5 million children dying by 2030 as a result of this administration’s cuts in aid. Tell me again how Trump is a humanitarian? Remind me again how much you care about children’s lives?
US children?
Are you seriously asking if dying children are from the US or not?
Much like Jay Jones, the deaths of children don't matter to me as long as it advances my policy positions.
Seriously, the republicans have no floor. You think millions of children dying as a result of your policies is funny, then complain that the dems hurt your feelings by calling you bad people.
When I see dumb comments like this I think back and wonder what happened to the hundreds of thousands of migrant children the Biden administration lost.
+1000 BUT that's different!
You mean the separations by Trump?
“Senior officials began discussions on forcible family separation in February 2017, several weeks after President Trump took office. US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and federal prosecutors piloted family separation in and around El Paso, Texas, between March and November 2017, and border-wide separations began in May 2018.
Behind the scenes, officials’ exchanges left no doubt that forcible family separation was the desired outcome of the policy rather than a byproduct of routine law enforcement operations. “We need to take away children,” Attorney General Jeff Sessions told federal prosecutors in May 2018. The same month, when a senior US Immigration and Customs Enforcement official learned that parents were returning from court before CBP had transferred their children, he wrote to “confirm that the expectation is that we are NOT to reunite the families”; reunification “obviously undermines the entire effort.”
https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/12/16/us-lasting-harm-family-separation-border
Are you still outraged about family separations?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LOL! The faux hysteria about Jones is off the rails this morning.
Jones is 100000% a better choice than the Trump-humping Miyares.
One party ends wars and frees hostages the other party celebrates and encourages murder of even of young children. Easy choice to make.
From a peer review study on Trump’s cuts to US aid. “Forecasting models predicted that the current steep funding cuts could result in more than 14 051 750 (uncertainty interval 8 475 990–19 662 191) additional all-age deaths, including 4 537 157 (3 124 796–5 910 791) in children younger than age 5 years, by 2030.”
From https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(25)01186-9/fulltext
Yep, ~4.5 million children dying by 2030 as a result of this administration’s cuts in aid. Tell me again how Trump is a humanitarian? Remind me again how much you care about children’s lives?
US children?
Are you seriously asking if dying children are from the US or not?
Much like Jay Jones, the deaths of children don't matter to me as long as it advances my policy positions.
Seriously, the republicans have no floor. You think millions of children dying as a result of your policies is funny, then complain that the dems hurt your feelings by calling you bad people.
When I see dumb comments like this I think back and wonder what happened to the hundreds of thousands of migrant children the Biden administration lost.
+1000 BUT that's different!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LOL! The faux hysteria about Jones is off the rails this morning.
Jones is 100000% a better choice than the Trump-humping Miyares.
One party ends wars and frees hostages the other party celebrates and encourages murder of even of young children. Easy choice to make.
From a peer review study on Trump’s cuts to US aid. “Forecasting models predicted that the current steep funding cuts could result in more than 14 051 750 (uncertainty interval 8 475 990–19 662 191) additional all-age deaths, including 4 537 157 (3 124 796–5 910 791) in children younger than age 5 years, by 2030.”
From https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(25)01186-9/fulltext
Yep, ~4.5 million children dying by 2030 as a result of this administration’s cuts in aid. Tell me again how Trump is a humanitarian? Remind me again how much you care about children’s lives?
US children?
Are you seriously asking if dying children are from the US or not?
Much like Jay Jones, the deaths of children don't matter to me as long as it advances my policy positions.
Seriously, the republicans have no floor. You think millions of children dying as a result of your policies is funny, then complain that the dems hurt your feelings by calling you bad people.
When I see dumb comments like this I think back and wonder what happened to the hundreds of thousands of migrant children the Biden administration lost.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LOL! The faux hysteria about Jones is off the rails this morning.
Jones is 100000% a better choice than the Trump-humping Miyares.
One party ends wars and frees hostages the other party celebrates and encourages murder of even of young children. Easy choice to make.
From a peer review study on Trump’s cuts to US aid. “Forecasting models predicted that the current steep funding cuts could result in more than 14 051 750 (uncertainty interval 8 475 990–19 662 191) additional all-age deaths, including 4 537 157 (3 124 796–5 910 791) in children younger than age 5 years, by 2030.”
From https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(25)01186-9/fulltext
Yep, ~4.5 million children dying by 2030 as a result of this administration’s cuts in aid. Tell me again how Trump is a humanitarian? Remind me again how much you care about children’s lives?
US children?
Are you seriously asking if dying children are from the US or not?
Much like Jay Jones, the deaths of children don't matter to me as long as it advances my policy positions.
Seriously, the republicans have no floor. You think millions of children dying as a result of your policies is funny, then complain that the dems hurt your feelings by calling you bad people.
When I see dumb comments like this I think back and wonder what happened to the hundreds of thousands of migrant children the Biden administration lost.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LOL! The faux hysteria about Jones is off the rails this morning.
Jones is 100000% a better choice than the Trump-humping Miyares.
One party ends wars and frees hostages the other party celebrates and encourages murder of even of young children. Easy choice to make.
From a peer review study on Trump’s cuts to US aid. “Forecasting models predicted that the current steep funding cuts could result in more than 14 051 750 (uncertainty interval 8 475 990–19 662 191) additional all-age deaths, including 4 537 157 (3 124 796–5 910 791) in children younger than age 5 years, by 2030.”
From https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(25)01186-9/fulltext
Yep, ~4.5 million children dying by 2030 as a result of this administration’s cuts in aid. Tell me again how Trump is a humanitarian? Remind me again how much you care about children’s lives?
US children?
Are you seriously asking if dying children are from the US or not?
Much like Jay Jones, the deaths of children don't matter to me as long as it advances my policy positions.
Seriously, the republicans have no floor. You think millions of children dying as a result of your policies is funny, then complain that the dems hurt your feelings by calling you bad people.
It was just a tasteless joke. All better now, right?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LOL! The faux hysteria about Jones is off the rails this morning.
Jones is 100000% a better choice than the Trump-humping Miyares.
One party ends wars and frees hostages the other party celebrates and encourages murder of even of young children. Easy choice to make.
From a peer review study on Trump’s cuts to US aid. “Forecasting models predicted that the current steep funding cuts could result in more than 14 051 750 (uncertainty interval 8 475 990–19 662 191) additional all-age deaths, including 4 537 157 (3 124 796–5 910 791) in children younger than age 5 years, by 2030.”
I’m not sure how republicans don’t understand that actual children dying isn’t funny. Despite your drama, no children were harmed by Jones’ texts.
From https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(25)01186-9/fulltext
Yep, ~4.5 million children dying by 2030 as a result of this administration’s cuts in aid. Tell me again how Trump is a humanitarian? Remind me again how much you care about children’s lives?
US children?
Are you seriously asking if dying children are from the US or not?
Much like Jay Jones, the deaths of children don't matter to me as long as it advances my policy positions.
Seriously, the republicans have no floor. You think millions of children dying as a result of your policies is funny, then complain that the dems hurt your feelings by calling you bad people.
It was just a tasteless joke. All better now, right?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LOL! The faux hysteria about Jones is off the rails this morning.
Jones is 100000% a better choice than the Trump-humping Miyares.
One party ends wars and frees hostages the other party celebrates and encourages murder of even of young children. Easy choice to make.
From a peer review study on Trump’s cuts to US aid. “Forecasting models predicted that the current steep funding cuts could result in more than 14 051 750 (uncertainty interval 8 475 990–19 662 191) additional all-age deaths, including 4 537 157 (3 124 796–5 910 791) in children younger than age 5 years, by 2030.”
From https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(25)01186-9/fulltext
Yep, ~4.5 million children dying by 2030 as a result of this administration’s cuts in aid. Tell me again how Trump is a humanitarian? Remind me again how much you care about children’s lives?
US children?
Are you seriously asking if dying children are from the US or not?
Much like Jay Jones, the deaths of children don't matter to me as long as it advances my policy positions.
Seriously, the republicans have no floor. You think millions of children dying as a result of your policies is funny, then complain that the dems hurt your feelings by calling you bad people.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LOL! The faux hysteria about Jones is off the rails this morning.
Jones is 100000% a better choice than the Trump-humping Miyares.
One party ends wars and frees hostages the other party celebrates and encourages murder of even of young children. Easy choice to make.
From a peer review study on Trump’s cuts to US aid. “Forecasting models predicted that the current steep funding cuts could result in more than 14 051 750 (uncertainty interval 8 475 990–19 662 191) additional all-age deaths, including 4 537 157 (3 124 796–5 910 791) in children younger than age 5 years, by 2030.”
From https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(25)01186-9/fulltext
Yep, ~4.5 million children dying by 2030 as a result of this administration’s cuts in aid. Tell me again how Trump is a humanitarian? Remind me again how much you care about children’s lives?
US children?
Are you seriously asking if dying children are from the US or not?
Much like Jay Jones, the deaths of children don't matter to me as long as it advances my policy positions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LOL! The faux hysteria about Jones is off the rails this morning.
Jones is 100000% a better choice than the Trump-humping Miyares.
One party ends wars and frees hostages the other party celebrates and encourages murder of even of young children. Easy choice to make.
From a peer review study on Trump’s cuts to US aid. “Forecasting models predicted that the current steep funding cuts could result in more than 14 051 750 (uncertainty interval 8 475 990–19 662 191) additional all-age deaths, including 4 537 157 (3 124 796–5 910 791) in children younger than age 5 years, by 2030.”
From https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(25)01186-9/fulltext
Yep, ~4.5 million children dying by 2030 as a result of this administration’s cuts in aid. Tell me again how Trump is a humanitarian? Remind me again how much you care about children’s lives?
US children?
Are you seriously asking if dying children are from the US or not?
Much like Jay Jones, the deaths of children don't matter to me as long as it advances my policy positions.
Seriously, the republicans have no floor. You think millions of children dying as a result of your policies is funny, then complain that the dems hurt your feelings by calling you bad people.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LOL! The faux hysteria about Jones is off the rails this morning.
Jones is 100000% a better choice than the Trump-humping Miyares.
One party ends wars and frees hostages the other party celebrates and encourages murder of even of young children. Easy choice to make.
From a peer review study on Trump’s cuts to US aid. “Forecasting models predicted that the current steep funding cuts could result in more than 14 051 750 (uncertainty interval 8 475 990–19 662 191) additional all-age deaths, including 4 537 157 (3 124 796–5 910 791) in children younger than age 5 years, by 2030.”
From https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(25)01186-9/fulltext
Yep, ~4.5 million children dying by 2030 as a result of this administration’s cuts in aid. Tell me again how Trump is a humanitarian? Remind me again how much you care about children’s lives?
US children?
Are you seriously asking if dying children are from the US or not?
Much like Jay Jones, the deaths of children don't matter to me as long as it advances my policy positions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LOL! The faux hysteria about Jones is off the rails this morning.
Jones is 100000% a better choice than the Trump-humping Miyares.
One party ends wars and frees hostages the other party celebrates and encourages murder of even of young children. Easy choice to make.
From a peer review study on Trump’s cuts to US aid. “Forecasting models predicted that the current steep funding cuts could result in more than 14 051 750 (uncertainty interval 8 475 990–19 662 191) additional all-age deaths, including 4 537 157 (3 124 796–5 910 791) in children younger than age 5 years, by 2030.”
From https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(25)01186-9/fulltext
Yep, ~4.5 million children dying by 2030 as a result of this administration’s cuts in aid. Tell me again how Trump is a humanitarian? Remind me again how much you care about children’s lives?
US children?
Are you seriously asking if dying children are from the US or not?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LOL! The faux hysteria about Jones is off the rails this morning.
Jones is 100000% a better choice than the Trump-humping Miyares.
One party ends wars and frees hostages the other party celebrates and encourages murder of even of young children. Easy choice to make.
From a peer review study on Trump’s cuts to US aid. “Forecasting models predicted that the current steep funding cuts could result in more than 14 051 750 (uncertainty interval 8 475 990–19 662 191) additional all-age deaths, including 4 537 157 (3 124 796–5 910 791) in children younger than age 5 years, by 2030.”
From https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(25)01186-9/fulltext
Yep, ~4.5 million children dying by 2030 as a result of this administration’s cuts in aid. Tell me again how Trump is a humanitarian? Remind me again how much you care about children’s lives?
US children?