Anonymous wrote:
Good God. No one is saying it NEVER happens. What everyone is saying, and this is backed up by data, is that it is an extremely small number of people that have committed voter fraud, something like 40 people in a 25 year period (and hundreds of millions of votes). Not enough to change the outcome of any election.
Anonymous wrote:we all know the Senate will pass this. Republicans have no spine.
Anonymous wrote:Well, it's one step closer now - Cornyn sold out his position on the filibuster in order to earn Trump's endorsement.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/elections/john-cornyn-save-america-act-filibuster-trump-texas-senate-rcna262927?utm_source=firefox-newtab-en-us
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UPDATE: the senate is voting on the SAVE America Act next week.
This is NOT a simple voter ID law. it's a full restructuring of how Americans register to vote.
breakdown from your Legalmiga®:
to register to vote, you'd need to show up in person with:
📄 passport
📄 birth certificate + photo ID
📄 naturalization papers
REAL IDs? ❌
military IDs? ❌
online, mail, and DMV registration? all gone.
140 million Americans don't have a passport.
up to 69 million women have name mismatches on their birth certificates.
in some rural counties, getting to an election office is a 7–8 hour round trip.
utah reviewed 2.1 million voter registrations looking for noncitizens.
they found ZERO confirmed cases of noncitizen voting.
zero. the bill's own senate sponsor, Mike Lee, is from Utah.
his state's data blows up the entire premise of this bill.
here's what's actually happening in the senate right now:
to pass a bill, you need 60 votes.
republicans only have 53. democrats won't budge.
trump and MAGA wanted a "talking filibuster" ... force democrats to stand on the floor and talk nonstop to block it. idea is they'd run out of steam.
Thune said no. not enough support, could tie up the senate for months, no guarantee it works.
straight 60-vote threshold next week...it is expected to fail.
so what problem is this actually solving?
none.
here's my lawyer take: this bill would disenfranchise millions, overwhelm election offices, and punish eligible voters (especially women, working-class folks, and rural Americans) while fixing a problem that data shows doesn't exist.
call your senators now. the vote is next week.
Pp - why did you fail to post the source of the above?? No attribution?
Here it is: https://www.threads.com/@legalmiga/post/DVMBghPlLtd/so-what-problem-is-this-actually-solving-none-heres-my-lawyer-take-this-bill
Anonymous wrote:UPDATE: the senate is voting on the SAVE America Act next week.
This is NOT a simple voter ID law. it's a full restructuring of how Americans register to vote.
breakdown from your Legalmiga®:
to register to vote, you'd need to show up in person with:
📄 passport
📄 birth certificate + photo ID
📄 naturalization papers
REAL IDs? ❌
military IDs? ❌
online, mail, and DMV registration? all gone.
140 million Americans don't have a passport.
up to 69 million women have name mismatches on their birth certificates.
in some rural counties, getting to an election office is a 7–8 hour round trip.
utah reviewed 2.1 million voter registrations looking for noncitizens.
they found ZERO confirmed cases of noncitizen voting.
zero. the bill's own senate sponsor, Mike Lee, is from Utah.
his state's data blows up the entire premise of this bill.
here's what's actually happening in the senate right now:
to pass a bill, you need 60 votes.
republicans only have 53. democrats won't budge.
trump and MAGA wanted a "talking filibuster" ... force democrats to stand on the floor and talk nonstop to block it. idea is they'd run out of steam.
Thune said no. not enough support, could tie up the senate for months, no guarantee it works.
straight 60-vote threshold next week...it is expected to fail.
so what problem is this actually solving?
none.
here's my lawyer take: this bill would disenfranchise millions, overwhelm election offices, and punish eligible voters (especially women, working-class folks, and rural Americans) while fixing a problem that data shows doesn't exist.
call your senators now. the vote is next week.
Anonymous wrote:UPDATE: the senate is voting on the SAVE America Act next week.
This is NOT a simple voter ID law. it's a full restructuring of how Americans register to vote.
breakdown from your Legalmiga®:
to register to vote, you'd need to show up in person with:
📄 passport
📄 birth certificate + photo ID
📄 naturalization papers
REAL IDs? ❌
military IDs? ❌
online, mail, and DMV registration? all gone.
140 million Americans don't have a passport.
up to 69 million women have name mismatches on their birth certificates.
in some rural counties, getting to an election office is a 7–8 hour round trip.
utah reviewed 2.1 million voter registrations looking for noncitizens.
they found ZERO confirmed cases of noncitizen voting.
zero. the bill's own senate sponsor, Mike Lee, is from Utah.
his state's data blows up the entire premise of this bill.
here's what's actually happening in the senate right now:
to pass a bill, you need 60 votes.
republicans only have 53. democrats won't budge.
trump and MAGA wanted a "talking filibuster" ... force democrats to stand on the floor and talk nonstop to block it. idea is they'd run out of steam.
Thune said no. not enough support, could tie up the senate for months, no guarantee it works.
straight 60-vote threshold next week...it is expected to fail.
so what problem is this actually solving?
none.
here's my lawyer take: this bill would disenfranchise millions, overwhelm election offices, and punish eligible voters (especially women, working-class folks, and rural Americans) while fixing a problem that data shows doesn't exist.
call your senators now. the vote is next week.