Anonymous wrote:How many people are in capital one arena?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The event looked small. The speech was objectively poor. Couldn't even get the band going. Just an underwhelming start to his Presidency.

Did you not see the packed capital one arena full of people cheering?

No.

Please go look and then report back.

To what end? What does Capital One have to do with his Inauguration event?

Go google it.

Anonymous wrote:Another similarity to Reagan. His 2nd inauguration was indoors due to similar weather.

I guess you could say that Republican presidents care more about the health and well being of all guests and observers - especially security personnel, police officers, and others.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The event looked small. The speech was objectively poor. Couldn't even get the band going. Just an underwhelming start to his Presidency.

Did you not see the packed capital one arena full of people cheering?

No.

Please go look and then report back.

To what end? What does Capital One have to do with his Inauguration event?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The event looked small. The speech was objectively poor. Couldn't even get the band going. Just an underwhelming start to his Presidency.

Did you not see the packed capital one arena full of people cheering?

No.

Please go look and then report back.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The event looked small. The speech was objectively poor. Couldn't even get the band going. Just an underwhelming start to his Presidency.

Did you not see the packed capital one arena full of people cheering?

What's that have to do with the Inauguration event?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Law and order will now come back to our cities.”

“There are only two genders, male and female.”

Finally, common sense returns.

1) criminal prosecution is generally a local government issue, not federal.

2) science is so much more complicated than 2 biological sexes (see e.g. https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-34290981). Not to mention intersex and other chromosomal differences than basic XY and XX.

There are many reasons people may not identify with just a male or female gender identity, including scientific reasons.

The 2 genders thing is meant to placate simpleton minds who cannot grasp more than boy/girl.

I just cannot with the scientifically illiterate anymore.

There are 2 sexes - FULL STOP. Anything else is an anomaly - things didn't go as planned. There was a mistake during transcription or translation, and the process was thrown off track. The article you referenced is about a group of people that lack a particular enzyme, which is critical in converting testosterone to dihydrotestosterone. Did you even read the article? This is not the discovery of a new sex. This is the discovery of a group of people who lack an enzyme that is critical to the development of sex characteristics. This is the discovery of an abnormality.

If someone is born anything other than XX or XY, something went wrong. Full stop.

It's like saying that there are two ways people can be born - either with 10 fingers and toes or more than that - they can have 11 or 12. Some people do have 11 or 12 - but that's only because there was a genetic abnormality that lead to an increased number of digits. Humans have 10 fingers and toes - full stop. Anything else is an abnormality. We don't need to change anatomy textbooks to account for abnormalities. And we don't need to change the number of sexes to account for abnormalities.

Please, learn some science.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The event looked small. The speech was objectively poor. Couldn't even get the band going. Just an underwhelming start to his Presidency.

Did you not see the packed capital one arena full of people cheering?

No.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The event looked small. The speech was objectively poor. Couldn't even get the band going. Just an underwhelming start to his Presidency.

Did you not see the packed capital one arena full of people cheering?

Anonymous wrote:That version of the national anthem was terrible!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:1930s Germany vibes. The world is watching and shaking their heads at the USA.

And the paramilitary Proud Boys are back, right on cue.

If they are so proud of themselves, why do they cover their faces?

Losers in every respect.