Anonymous wrote:I don't remember the same level of outrage against a sitting president (Reagan, in this case) when 241 military personnel were killed by suicide bombers at the Marine Corps barracks in Beirut, Lebanon in 1983.
A military fact-finding committee found that "senior military officials were responsible for security lapses and blamed the military chain of command for the disaster. It suggested that there might have been many fewer deaths if the barracks guards had carried loaded weapons and a barrier more substantial than the barbed wire the bomber drove over easily."
Following the bombing, "the presence of protective barriers (bollards) became common around critical government facilities in the United States and elsewhere, particularly Western civic targets situated overseas."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump wins again
Left embarrassed over Afghanistan disaster and can’t admit stupidity.
Too many failures to count.
Do you not know this?
Trump closed the State Department Special Visa office, which meant there was no one to process exit VISAs in a timely manner.
Trump negotiated with the Taliban, directly, cutting out the Afghan government.
Trump released the 5,000 Taliban warriors who then terrorized the country before Biden even took office.
Trump pared the US presence down to 2,500 troops before Biden took office, and Biden couldn't escalate without violating the "deal" he and Pompeo struck.
The whole thing was a "set up to fail" operation. Just like Trump and Netanyahu as it relates to Gaza, just like Trump and Putin as it relates to Ukraine and just like Trump and the GOP senate as it relates to the Border Bill.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
So you believe this Marine is lying?
No, I have no reason to believe he's lying. That's what I clarified in the post directly below. Is this a case where you choosing to believe the military? Is it more convenient to the narrative this time?
As opposed to the military saying that the campaign violated the rules of section 60?
The rules not a single poster can list or link to?
Ooh ooh, I CAN!!!!
https://www.axios.com/2024/08/29/trump-arlington-national-cemetery-rules
You are so welcome. (I hope you are able to read.)
Trump followed all the rules.
The ANC says he did not. I believe them. Especially over a proven liar. Why do you disrespect our beloved national cemetery?
If you think I am disrespecting our beloved national cemetery, I can definitely say you are not discussing this issue in good faith. You are accusing everyone who doesn’t agree with you of disrespecting Arlington.
Do you think the Gold Star Families are disrespecting Arlington as well, by holding a wreath laying ceremony and visiting the graves of their sons and daughters with the man who they invited to lay the wreath?
Was this ceremony disrespectful?
The act of using it as a political ad on TikTok was disrespectful if that's what you're asking.
There was no campaign or election signs, slogans, etc, no exhortations to vote, etc.
What made the tik tok a political ad? Be specific.
What? It is from his campaign to support his candidacy. That is the point of campaign material.
The material is not from his campaign. It was from the wreath laying ceremony.
Uggg. The tik tok ad on from his campaign. Ok. Not the ceremony.
The tik tok has no campaign or election ads or verbiage or endorsements or signs or anything to do with the upcoming election. Biden was president during the Abbey Gate bombing. Harris was VP.
The campaign ad said "they". It compared his administration against their administration. But are you saying you don't hold Harris responsible? That's refreshing.
So you are designating a tik tok with no mention of the upcoming election, no mention of the Trump campaign, no reminders to vote, no mention of anything to do with either the campaign or election, a “campaign ad?”
It is from the trump campaign. Yes it is. Take it up with Arlington national cemetery if you object.
It’s not a campaign ad, it’s a tik tok. It doesn’t mention either Trump’s campaign or the November election. Trump was invited on the anniversary of Abbey Gate to participate in a wreath laying ceremony live streamed by mainstream media outlets.
You think the Gold Star Families want to be in Arlington? They do not.
The political ad was posted on TikTok by his campaign. He contrasted his administration with theirs. Campaigns are being conducted on social media these days. This should really be straightforward to understand, even for MAGA.
When Biden gave his exit speech from the Oval sitting at the Resolute Desk he contrasted himself and Harris with Trump. Where were you then?
Anonymous wrote:Trump wins again
Left embarrassed over Afghanistan disaster and can’t admit stupidity.
Too many failures to count.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
So you believe this Marine is lying?
No, I have no reason to believe he's lying. That's what I clarified in the post directly below. Is this a case where you choosing to believe the military? Is it more convenient to the narrative this time?
As opposed to the military saying that the campaign violated the rules of section 60?
The rules not a single poster can list or link to?
Ooh ooh, I CAN!!!!
https://www.axios.com/2024/08/29/trump-arlington-national-cemetery-rules
You are so welcome. (I hope you are able to read.)
Trump followed all the rules.
The ANC says he did not. I believe them. Especially over a proven liar. Why do you disrespect our beloved national cemetery?
If you think I am disrespecting our beloved national cemetery, I can definitely say you are not discussing this issue in good faith. You are accusing everyone who doesn’t agree with you of disrespecting Arlington.
Do you think the Gold Star Families are disrespecting Arlington as well, by holding a wreath laying ceremony and visiting the graves of their sons and daughters with the man who they invited to lay the wreath?
Was this ceremony disrespectful?
The act of using it as a political ad on TikTok was disrespectful if that's what you're asking.
There was no campaign or election signs, slogans, etc, no exhortations to vote, etc.
What made the tik tok a political ad? Be specific.
What? It is from his campaign to support his candidacy. That is the point of campaign material.
The material is not from his campaign. It was from the wreath laying ceremony.
Uggg. The tik tok ad on from his campaign. Ok. Not the ceremony.
The tik tok has no campaign or election ads or verbiage or endorsements or signs or anything to do with the upcoming election. Biden was president during the Abbey Gate bombing. Harris was VP.
The campaign ad said "they". It compared his administration against their administration. But are you saying you don't hold Harris responsible? That's refreshing.
So you are designating a tik tok with no mention of the upcoming election, no mention of the Trump campaign, no reminders to vote, no mention of anything to do with either the campaign or election, a “campaign ad?”
It is from the trump campaign. Yes it is. Take it up with Arlington national cemetery if you object.
It’s not a campaign ad, it’s a tik tok. It doesn’t mention either Trump’s campaign or the November election. Trump was invited on the anniversary of Abbey Gate to participate in a wreath laying ceremony live streamed by mainstream media outlets.
You think the Gold Star Families want to be in Arlington? They do not.
The political ad was posted on TikTok by his campaign. He contrasted his administration with theirs. Campaigns are being conducted on social media these days. This should really be straightforward to understand, even for MAGA.
Anonymous wrote:
There is absolutely zero proof that Biden and Harris were invited. And, to prove that, you can look to the sourcing that claims that it was intentional to make Biden and Harris look bad, JUST AS COTTON IS DOING HERE.
The whole thing was a put-on to gaslight voters into believing Trump give a sh*t about anything, and particularly our fallen war heroes.
And people like you fall for it every.single.time.
Anonymous wrote:
There is absolutely zero proof that Biden and Harris were invited. And, to prove that, you can look to the sourcing that claims that it was intentional to make Biden and Harris look bad, JUST AS COTTON IS DOING HERE.
The whole thing was a put-on to gaslight voters into believing Trump give a sh*t about anything, and particularly our fallen war heroes.
And people like you fall for it every.single.time.
Anonymous wrote:The Trump campaign better hold on to the footage they claim proves they didn’t assault the cemetery worker. I bet Congress is going to subpoena it. Charges can still be filed up to a year after the incident. It’s going to look bad if they can’t produce it. After January 20, I think there will be hearings. Trump should fire those two campaign workers and get ahead of it. I’m mindful that Trump didn’t assault anyone here, it’s alleged two of his goons did.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
So you believe this Marine is lying?
No, I have no reason to believe he's lying. That's what I clarified in the post directly below. Is this a case where you choosing to believe the military? Is it more convenient to the narrative this time?
As opposed to the military saying that the campaign violated the rules of section 60?
The rules not a single poster can list or link to?
Ooh ooh, I CAN!!!!
https://www.axios.com/2024/08/29/trump-arlington-national-cemetery-rules
You are so welcome. (I hope you are able to read.)
Trump followed all the rules.
The ANC says he did not. I believe them. Especially over a proven liar. Why do you disrespect our beloved national cemetery?
If you think I am disrespecting our beloved national cemetery, I can definitely say you are not discussing this issue in good faith. You are accusing everyone who doesn’t agree with you of disrespecting Arlington.
Do you think the Gold Star Families are disrespecting Arlington as well, by holding a wreath laying ceremony and visiting the graves of their sons and daughters with the man who they invited to lay the wreath?
Was this ceremony disrespectful?
The act of using it as a political ad on TikTok was disrespectful if that's what you're asking.
There was no campaign or election signs, slogans, etc, no exhortations to vote, etc.
What made the tik tok a political ad? Be specific.
What? It is from his campaign to support his candidacy. That is the point of campaign material.
The material is not from his campaign. It was from the wreath laying ceremony.
Uggg. The tik tok ad on from his campaign. Ok. Not the ceremony.
The tik tok has no campaign or election ads or verbiage or endorsements or signs or anything to do with the upcoming election. Biden was president during the Abbey Gate bombing. Harris was VP.
The campaign ad said "they". It compared his administration against their administration. But are you saying you don't hold Harris responsible? That's refreshing.
So you are designating a tik tok with no mention of the upcoming election, no mention of the Trump campaign, no reminders to vote, no mention of anything to do with either the campaign or election, a “campaign ad?”
It is from the trump campaign. Yes it is. Take it up with Arlington national cemetery if you object.
It’s not a campaign ad, it’s a tik tok. It doesn’t mention either Trump’s campaign or the November election. Trump was invited on the anniversary of Abbey Gate to participate in a wreath laying ceremony live streamed by mainstream media outlets.
You think the Gold Star Families want to be in Arlington? They do not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
So you believe this Marine is lying?
No, I have no reason to believe he's lying. That's what I clarified in the post directly below. Is this a case where you choosing to believe the military? Is it more convenient to the narrative this time?
As opposed to the military saying that the campaign violated the rules of section 60?
The rules not a single poster can list or link to?
Ooh ooh, I CAN!!!!
https://www.axios.com/2024/08/29/trump-arlington-national-cemetery-rules
You are so welcome. (I hope you are able to read.)
Trump followed all the rules.
The ANC says he did not. I believe them. Especially over a proven liar. Why do you disrespect our beloved national cemetery?
If you think I am disrespecting our beloved national cemetery, I can definitely say you are not discussing this issue in good faith. You are accusing everyone who doesn’t agree with you of disrespecting Arlington.
Do you think the Gold Star Families are disrespecting Arlington as well, by holding a wreath laying ceremony and visiting the graves of their sons and daughters with the man who they invited to lay the wreath?
Was this ceremony disrespectful?
The act of using it as a political ad on TikTok was disrespectful if that's what you're asking.
There was no campaign or election signs, slogans, etc, no exhortations to vote, etc.
What made the tik tok a political ad? Be specific.
What? It is from his campaign to support his candidacy. That is the point of campaign material.
The material is not from his campaign. It was from the wreath laying ceremony.
Uggg. The tik tok ad on from his campaign. Ok. Not the ceremony.
The tik tok has no campaign or election ads or verbiage or endorsements or signs or anything to do with the upcoming election. Biden was president during the Abbey Gate bombing. Harris was VP.
The campaign ad said "they". It compared his administration against their administration. But are you saying you don't hold Harris responsible? That's refreshing.
So you are designating a tik tok with no mention of the upcoming election, no mention of the Trump campaign, no reminders to vote, no mention of anything to do with either the campaign or election, a “campaign ad?”
It is from the trump campaign. Yes it is. Take it up with Arlington national cemetery if you object.
It’s not a campaign ad, it’s a tik tok. It doesn’t mention either Trump’s campaign or the November election. Trump was invited on the anniversary of Abbey Gate to participate in a wreath laying ceremony live streamed by mainstream media outlets.
You think the Gold Star Families want to be in Arlington? They do not.
Again. What do you or I know? The army and the cemetery object to it.
All but one or two of the Abbey Gate are Marines. What do the Marines say?
Do you care about the feelings of the family members at all?