Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:equal rights for others does not mean fewer rights for you. it is not pie.

-my favroite tshirt

But it actually is. There are even physics equations for this.

I'm sorry but just to clarify, you are you under the impression that there are physics equations that apply to an understanding of human rights?

Yes. we all live within the parameters of the science of the world and ourselves. The equations we make deal with the environment as well as human behavior and rights we deem appropriate in society.
Laws of energy apply to human rights and behavior just like all other physical laws of the world do.
There are entire fields of study that revolve around this.
Here are some examples:
https://academic.oup.com/mit-press-scholarship-online/book/19055/chapter-abstract/177463481?redirectedFrom=fulltext
https://aeon.co/essays/what-can-a-thermodynamics-of-mind-say-about-how-to-thrive
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3825144/

Fortunately, we don't have any one person responsible for making all of the decisions for humanity. So the inability to properly multi-task isn't really an issue here.

My comment was in response to this one which said that somehow equal rights for others doesn't mean fewer rights for you. That is completely false based on the finite world and our finite bodies. We are pie. The world is pie.

equal rights for others does not mean fewer rights for you. it is not pie.

-my favroite tshirt

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:equal rights for others does not mean fewer rights for you. it is not pie.

-my favroite tshirt

But it actually is. There are even physics equations for this.

I'm sorry but just to clarify, you are you under the impression that there are physics equations that apply to an understanding of human rights?

Yes. we all live within the parameters of the science of the world and ourselves. The equations we make deal with the environment as well as human behavior and rights we deem appropriate in society.
Laws of energy apply to human rights and behavior just like all other physical laws of the world do.
There are entire fields of study that revolve around this.
Here are some examples:
https://academic.oup.com/mit-press-scholarship-online/book/19055/chapter-abstract/177463481?redirectedFrom=fulltext
https://aeon.co/essays/what-can-a-thermodynamics-of-mind-say-about-how-to-thrive
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3825144/

Fortunately, we don't have any one person responsible for making all of the decisions for humanity. So the inability to properly multi-task isn't really an issue here.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:equal rights for others does not mean fewer rights for you. it is not pie.

-my favroite tshirt

But it actually is. There are even physics equations for this.

I'm sorry but just to clarify, you are you under the impression that there are physics equations that apply to an understanding of human rights?

Yes. we all live within the parameters of the science of the world and ourselves. The equations we make deal with the environment as well as human behavior and rights we deem appropriate in society.
Laws of energy apply to human rights and behavior just like all other physical laws of the world do.
There are entire fields of study that revolve around this.
Here are some examples:
https://academic.oup.com/mit-press-scholarship-online/book/19055/chapter-abstract/177463481?redirectedFrom=fulltext
https://aeon.co/essays/what-can-a-thermodynamics-of-mind-say-about-how-to-thrive
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3825144/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:equal rights for others does not mean fewer rights for you. it is not pie.

-my favroite tshirt

But it actually is. There are even physics equations for this.

I'm sorry but just to clarify, you are you under the impression that there are physics equations that apply to an understanding of human rights?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:equal rights for others does not mean fewer rights for you. it is not pie.

-my favroite tshirt

But it actually is. There are even physics equations for this.

I'm sorry but just to clarify, you are you under the impression that there are physics equations that apply to an understanding of human rights?

DP, but intuitively everyone understands that there are finite resources, and that spending every last dollar in the name of "equity" to help a child with a particular diagnosis "succeed" means that other children who have not been the subject of a diagnosis may be put at risk of failing.

I gather than some of the Republican candidates have refused to commit unlimited resources to students with certain disabilities before the election. What some activists may see as indifference may well simply be caution. As has been pointed out, Democratic candidates have a track record of making promises they don't keep and commitments they do not honor. It feels good in the moment, but leaves a bitter taste in the mouth.

They can certainly do a better job than the current SB that would encourage parents to homeschool their children they find challenging. They can do better than denying children a year of school.

Competence matter. Rachna is a HR professional, yet we are hemorrhaging teachers leaving the profession.

Karl, doesn’t have a degree, doesn’t practice a trade, isn’t an artist, and most certainly isn’t an athlete.

We’ve seen what these clowns deliver.

Karl's opponent also doesn't have a college degree. In fact Karl is closer to obtaining his college degree than Sabio is.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:equal rights for others does not mean fewer rights for you. it is not pie.

-my favroite tshirt

But it actually is. There are even physics equations for this.

I'm sorry but just to clarify, you are you under the impression that there are physics equations that apply to an understanding of human rights?

DP, but intuitively everyone understands that there are finite resources, and that spending every last dollar in the name of "equity" to help a child with a particular diagnosis "succeed" means that other children who have not been the subject of a diagnosis may be put at risk of failing.

I gather than some of the Republican candidates have refused to commit unlimited resources to students with certain disabilities before the election. What some activists may see as indifference may well simply be caution. As has been pointed out, Democratic candidates have a track record of making promises they don't keep and commitments they do not honor. It feels good in the moment, but leaves a bitter taste in the mouth.

You: screw them kids with disabilities!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:AAP on its way out now too. It’ll take a while for dem voters to feel the impact. But by then, they will have probably convinced themselves it was for the best.

The democrats running FCPS hate the AAP program. They are working to dismantle it.

Just look at the new “HOPE” rating scale the democrats put in place instead of the old, academic-focused scale:

https://www.fcps.edu/system/files/forms/2023-10/hoperatingscale.pdf

Democrats are deconstructing AAP in other ways too, including E3 math.

How does E3 math deconstruct AAP?

I don’t know about deconstruct, but it definitely makes it hard to take Algebra in 7th since it doesn’t teach the same compacted math schedule current advanced math does. It will result in one year less acceleration which is just a small part of watering down AAP and advanced academics as a whole in the county.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:equal rights for others does not mean fewer rights for you. it is not pie.

-my favroite tshirt

But it actually is. There are even physics equations for this.

I'm sorry but just to clarify, you are you under the impression that there are physics equations that apply to an understanding of human rights?

DP, but intuitively everyone understands that there are finite resources, and that spending every last dollar in the name of "equity" to help a child with a particular diagnosis "succeed" means that other children who have not been the subject of a diagnosis may be put at risk of failing.

I gather than some of the Republican candidates have refused to commit unlimited resources to students with certain disabilities before the election. What some activists may see as indifference may well simply be caution. As has been pointed out, Democratic candidates have a track record of making promises they don't keep and commitments they do not honor. It feels good in the moment, but leaves a bitter taste in the mouth.

They can certainly do a better job than the current SB that would encourage parents to homeschool their children they find challenging. They can do better than denying children a year of school.

Competence matter. Rachna is a HR professional, yet we are hemorrhaging teachers leaving the profession.

Karl, doesn’t have a degree, doesn’t practice a trade, isn’t an artist, and most certainly isn’t an athlete.

We’ve seen what these clowns deliver.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:equal rights for others does not mean fewer rights for you. it is not pie.

-my favroite tshirt

But it actually is. There are even physics equations for this.

I'm sorry but just to clarify, you are you under the impression that there are physics equations that apply to an understanding of human rights?

DP, but intuitively everyone understands that there are finite resources, and that spending every last dollar in the name of "equity" to help a child with a particular diagnosis "succeed" means that other children who have not been the subject of a diagnosis may be put at risk of failing.

I gather than some of the Republican candidates have refused to commit unlimited resources to students with certain disabilities before the election. What some activists may see as indifference may well simply be caution. As has been pointed out, Democratic candidates have a track record of making promises they don't keep and commitments they do not honor. It feels good in the moment, but leaves a bitter taste in the mouth.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:equal rights for others does not mean fewer rights for you. it is not pie.

-my favroite tshirt

But it actually is. There are even physics equations for this.

I'm sorry but just to clarify, you are you under the impression that there are physics equations that apply to an understanding of human rights?

DP, but intuitively everyone understands that there are finite resources, and that spending every last dollar in the name of "equity" to help a child with a particular diagnosis "succeed" means that other children who have not been the subject of a diagnosis may be put at risk of failing.

I gather than some of the Republican candidates have refused to commit unlimited resources to students with certain disabilities before the election. What some activists may see as indifference may well simply be caution. As has been pointed out, Democratic candidates have a track record of making promises they don't keep and commitments they do not honor. It feels good in the moment, but leaves a bitter taste in the mouth.

They can certainly do a better job than the current SB that would encourage parents to homeschool their children they find challenging. They can do better than denying children a year of school.

Competence matter. Rachna is a HR professional, yet we are hemorrhaging teachers leaving the profession.

Karl, doesn’t have a degree, doesn’t practice a trade, isn’t an artist, and most certainly isn’t an athlete.

We’ve seen what these clowns deliver.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:equal rights for others does not mean fewer rights for you. it is not pie.

-my favroite tshirt

But it actually is. There are even physics equations for this.

I'm sorry but just to clarify, you are you under the impression that there are physics equations that apply to an understanding of human rights?

DP, but intuitively everyone understands that there are finite resources, and that spending every last dollar in the name of "equity" to help a child with a particular diagnosis "succeed" means that other children who have not been the subject of a diagnosis may be put at risk of failing.

I gather than some of the Republican candidates have refused to commit unlimited resources to students with certain disabilities before the election. What some activists may see as indifference may well simply be caution. As has been pointed out, Democratic candidates have a track record of making promises they don't keep and commitments they do not honor. It feels good in the moment, but leaves a bitter taste in the mouth.

Anonymous wrote:The last email from FCPS said the goal is to have most students take Algebra I by 8th grade. It doesn't seem like the goal is to end advanced math but rather have more kids take Algebra by 8th grade so they can take higher level math classes in HS.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:AAP on its way out now too. It’ll take a while for dem voters to feel the impact. But by then, they will have probably convinced themselves it was for the best.

The democrats running FCPS hate the AAP program. They are working to dismantle it.

Just look at the new “HOPE” rating scale the democrats put in place instead of the old, academic-focused scale:

https://www.fcps.edu/system/files/forms/2023-10/hoperatingscale.pdf

Democrats are deconstructing AAP in other ways too, including E3 math.

How does E3 math deconstruct AAP?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:equal rights for others does not mean fewer rights for you. it is not pie.

-my favroite tshirt

But it actually is. There are even physics equations for this.

I'm sorry but just to clarify, you are you under the impression that there are physics equations that apply to an understanding of human rights?