Anonymous
08/23/2023 14:13
Subject: Re:GA Case
Anonymous wrote:
No. Rudy is delusional. The premise of his argument is that running for president gives you immunity.
He’s also lying. Trump has not been found innocent. There have been no trials on January 6 to date. (And he lost the e Jean Carroll civil case). He has not been denied his right to counsel. I could go on but I’m no longer prepared to be politely silent when people lie.
And he’s terrified. Hear the shake in his voice.
That's the alcoholism and desperation.
Anonymous
08/23/2023 14:02
Subject: Re:GA Case
No he’s not. Among other things he’s wrong about mentioned by PP, being a lawyer is a privilege, not a right. A privilege that can be and has been suspended or revoked. Lawyers need to obey the law and uphold the ethical principles of the profession or be subject to discipline.
Anonymous
08/23/2023 11:55
Subject: Re:GA Case
Anonymous wrote:
No. Rudy is delusional. The premise of his argument is that running for president gives you immunity.
He’s also lying. Trump has not been found innocent. There have been no trials on January 6 to date. (And he lost the e Jean Carroll civil case). He has not been denied his right to counsel. I could go on but I’m no longer prepared to be politely silent when people lie.
And he’s terrified. Hear the shake in his voice.
If that was true, then why wouldn't everyone potentially at risk of a criminal indictment start running for President? Shoot up a school? Just run for President and get immunity! The argument is patently absurd.
Anonymous
08/23/2023 11:53
Subject: Re:GA Case
No. Rudy is delusional. The premise of his argument is that running for president gives you immunity.
He’s also lying. Trump has not been found innocent. There have been no trials on January 6 to date. (And he lost the e Jean Carroll civil case). He has not been denied his right to counsel. I could go on but I’m no longer prepared to be politely silent when people lie.
And he’s terrified. Hear the shake in his voice.
Anonymous
08/23/2023 10:09
Subject: Re:GA Case
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Yeah, his only choices are to make emergency travel arrangements, or be a fugitive? Guess you should've booked your travel sooner, a$$hole! Where does he live, anyway? He can probably make it there by the end of the week if he drove.
Why would he be granted this deferral anyway? It’s a criminal indictment not an invite to a spa weekend.
He claims that what he did was one of his official duties within the Dept of Justice. So, he is trying to move his case to federal court. Since his appeal to move the trial to federal court is still pending and will not a response before Friday's noon deadline, he is asking for a deferral until that request is addressed. His point is that should he get his case moved to federal court, he would not be arrested in Georgia and he would not need to travel to Atlanta.
His argument is bullshit though. He participated in a conspiracy to defraud Georgia that included persuading state party officials and unelected electors to sign fraudulent documents. None of that was remotely in his job duties at DOJ and his RICO trial is not severable from the Georgia trial of the Georgia officials that he helped dupe into committing fraud in Georgia.
It would be hilarious if the feds charged him with the same charges in addition to, not instead, of the state charges. It can be done. If U.S. Marshals have to arrest them and extradite them to Georgia, they will likely never be released on bail.
This is complicated because I think Meadows has been cooperating with the Feds but clearly not with Willis.
Anonymous
08/23/2023 08:10
Subject: Re:GA Case
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Yeah, his only choices are to make emergency travel arrangements, or be a fugitive? Guess you should've booked your travel sooner, a$$hole! Where does he live, anyway? He can probably make it there by the end of the week if he drove.
Why would he be granted this deferral anyway? It’s a criminal indictment not an invite to a spa weekend.
He claims that what he did was one of his official duties within the Dept of Justice. So, he is trying to move his case to federal court. Since his appeal to move the trial to federal court is still pending and will not a response before Friday's noon deadline, he is asking for a deferral until that request is addressed. His point is that should he get his case moved to federal court, he would not be arrested in Georgia and he would not need to travel to Atlanta.
It would be in federal court in Atlanta, wouldn’t it?
I assume the courts have run out of patience on these procedural delays. Trump has tried to call every action - including hush money to Stormy Daniels - an "official presidential act". He's crafted this fiction that sitting presidents, ex-presidents, candidates, and the people working for them are all immune from prosecution.
This "l'etat c'est moi" attitude was rightly tossed in the garbage can by our Founders.
Exactly. We are all tired of it. And sick of people say that it's all decided at the election box. No. If they commit crimes while they are entrusted as a public servant, we do get to prosecute that. Not just *not* re-elect them. Otherwise we have a corrupt system where public officials can do anything they want.
Anonymous
08/23/2023 05:36
Subject: Re:GA Case
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Yeah, his only choices are to make emergency travel arrangements, or be a fugitive? Guess you should've booked your travel sooner, a$$hole! Where does he live, anyway? He can probably make it there by the end of the week if he drove.
Why would he be granted this deferral anyway? It’s a criminal indictment not an invite to a spa weekend.
He claims that what he did was one of his official duties within the Dept of Justice. So, he is trying to move his case to federal court. Since his appeal to move the trial to federal court is still pending and will not a response before Friday's noon deadline, he is asking for a deferral until that request is addressed. His point is that should he get his case moved to federal court, he would not be arrested in Georgia and he would not need to travel to Atlanta.
His argument is bullshit though. He participated in a conspiracy to defraud Georgia that included persuading state party officials and unelected electors to sign fraudulent documents. None of that was remotely in his job duties at DOJ and his RICO trial is not severable from the Georgia trial of the Georgia officials that he helped dupe into committing fraud in Georgia.
It would be hilarious if the feds charged him with the same charges in addition to, not instead, of the state charges. It can be done. If U.S. Marshals have to arrest them and extradite them to Georgia, they will likely never be released on bail.
Anonymous
08/23/2023 00:05
Subject: GA Case
Eastman looks like they told him his bail number right before they snapped his mugshot.
Anonymous
Anonymous
08/22/2023 23:25
Subject: Re:GA Case
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All right, listen up, ladies and gentlemen, our fugitive has been on the run for ninety minutes. Average foot speed over uneven ground, barring injuries, is 4 miles per hour. That gives us a radius of six miles. What I want from each and every one of you is a hard-target search of every gas station, residence, warehouse, farmhouse, henhouse, outhouse and doghouse in that area. Checkpoints go up at fifteen miles.
Check the McDonald’s. He can’t resist.
Sadly, it's not the Cheeto who is the potential fugitive.
Clark and Meadows have both claimed that they can’t make it there by Friday having received two weeks notice.
And Ms. Willis told them what will happen.
I missed it. What will happen?
She will issue arrest warrants at noon on Friday.
+1
Anonymous
Anonymous
08/22/2023 23:17
Subject: Re:GA Case
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Yeah, his only choices are to make emergency travel arrangements, or be a fugitive? Guess you should've booked your travel sooner, a$$hole! Where does he live, anyway? He can probably make it there by the end of the week if he drove.
Why would he be granted this deferral anyway? It’s a criminal indictment not an invite to a spa weekend.
He claims that what he did was one of his official duties within the Dept of Justice. So, he is trying to move his case to federal court. Since his appeal to move the trial to federal court is still pending and will not a response before Friday's noon deadline, he is asking for a deferral until that request is addressed. His point is that should he get his case moved to federal court, he would not be arrested in Georgia and he would not need to travel to Atlanta.
It would be in federal court in Atlanta, wouldn’t it?
I assume the courts have run out of patience on these procedural delays. Trump has tried to call every action - including hush money to Stormy Daniels - an "official presidential act". He's crafted this fiction that sitting presidents, ex-presidents, candidates, and the people working for them are all immune from prosecution.
This "l'etat c'est moi" attitude was rightly tossed in the garbage can by our Founders.
Anonymous
08/22/2023 22:24
Subject: Re:GA Case
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Yeah, his only choices are to make emergency travel arrangements, or be a fugitive? Guess you should've booked your travel sooner, a$$hole! Where does he live, anyway? He can probably make it there by the end of the week if he drove.
Why would he be granted this deferral anyway? It’s a criminal indictment not an invite to a spa weekend.
He claims that what he did was one of his official duties within the Dept of Justice. So, he is trying to move his case to federal court. Since his appeal to move the trial to federal court is still pending and will not a response before Friday's noon deadline, he is asking for a deferral until that request is addressed. His point is that should he get his case moved to federal court, he would not be arrested in Georgia and he would not need to travel to Atlanta.
It would be in federal court in Atlanta, wouldn’t it?
Anonymous
08/22/2023 22:01
Subject: Re:GA Case
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Yeah, his only choices are to make emergency travel arrangements, or be a fugitive? Guess you should've booked your travel sooner, a$$hole! Where does he live, anyway? He can probably make it there by the end of the week if he drove.
Why would he be granted this deferral anyway? It’s a criminal indictment not an invite to a spa weekend.
He claims that what he did was one of his official duties within the Dept of Justice. So, he is trying to move his case to federal court. Since his appeal to move the trial to federal court is still pending and will not a response before Friday's noon deadline, he is asking for a deferral until that request is addressed. His point is that should he get his case moved to federal court, he would not be arrested in Georgia and he would not need to travel to Atlanta.
His argument is bullshit though. He participated in a conspiracy to defraud Georgia that included persuading state party officials and unelected electors to sign fraudulent documents. None of that was remotely in his job duties at DOJ and his RICO trial is not severable from the Georgia trial of the Georgia officials that he helped dupe into committing fraud in Georgia.