Anonymous wrote:I’m curious about the spontaneous pro-Trump flash mob that showed up to cheer on his motorcade as he left Mar a Lago, complete with large signs and flags at the ready. Do people in his neighborhood keep these handy, ready to deploy when Trump drives by? Are they paid to be there for the requisite photo-op? It doesn’t seem spontaneous at all.

Anonymous wrote:I think Melania compartmentalizes it. Russian women are tough as nails.

I feel bad for their son. I felt bad for Chelsea Clinton too. Kids don’t deserve to get dragged into this stuff.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Melania compartmentalizes it. Russian women are tough as nails.

I feel bad for their son. I felt bad for Chelsea Clinton too. Kids don’t deserve to get dragged into this stuff.

Chelsea is crying all the way to the bank.

Anonymous wrote:I think Melania compartmentalizes it. Russian women are tough as nails.

I feel bad for their son. I felt bad for Chelsea Clinton too. Kids don’t deserve to get dragged into this stuff.

Anonymous wrote:I wonder if Melania will "stand by her man?"

Do you think she believes his denial that he has sex with SD while she was home caring for their newborn?

How would you like to be a 17 year old (his son's age) with your father going through this public humiliation???

Anonymous wrote:OMG! Trump will be DNA tested tomorrow. He refused to give his DNA to E. Jean Carroll and that case is scheduled later in April. Will this mean that she can use his DNA swab in her case? Supposedly, she has a "blue dress" DNA sample.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder if Melania will "stand by her man?"

Do you think she believes his denial that he has sex with SD while she was home caring for their newborn?

How would you like to be a 17 year old (his son's age) with your father going through this public humiliation???

Oh dear. They're inured by now. He's accumulated so much humiliating stuff for himself and his family, PP. At this point nothing hurts anymore.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Having sat on a grand jury, I know you can pretty much indict a ham sandwich. This latest is a true nothing burger.

Oh do tell. I guess having sat on a grand jury makes you all knowing. I truly would like to hear how you know this is a “ nothing burger”. Spoken like a true MAGA idiot!

So typical of someone with no knowledge of grand jury proceedings has to resort to name calling. You kill your position when you do so.

Anonymous wrote:I wonder if Melania will "stand by her man?"

Do you think she believes his denial that he has sex with SD while she was home caring for their newborn?

How would you like to be a 17 year old (his son's age) with your father going through this public humiliation???

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are gag orders usually put in place? Is there a reason why they would do it in this case?

It’s not a default or even preferred. But Judges can and will do it to avoid poisoning the jury pool, threats against judges, prosecutors court staff, and juries and I ncitement to violence, etc.Trump has already done all three, so yes, I see a gag order in his future.

It would be narrowly tailored, in all likely hood— he could talk and campaign and continue as normal, except he could not discuss the case. And it would apply to everyone associated the the. Case— the DA, Court staff, Trump lawyers. Trump wants to screech about illegal aliens or his steak being too rare, he could continue to do so.

A high profile gag order recently was the Roger Stone case. Given 1/6, and that Trump has already attacked the Judge and Prosecutor by name, and posted a picture of himself with a bat ready to hit a judge, this may be the best case for a gag order I’ve ever seen.

I would say I’ve never seen someone do so much to earn a gag order before they are even arraigned.

Which allows the media to talk talk talk with no rebuttals

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are gag orders usually put in place? Is there a reason why they would do it in this case?

It’s not a default or even preferred. But Judges can and will do it to avoid poisoning the jury pool, threats against judges, prosecutors court staff, and juries and I ncitement to violence, etc.Trump has already done all three, so yes, I see a gag order in his future.

It would be narrowly tailored, in all likely hood— he could talk and campaign and continue as normal, except he could not discuss the case. And it would apply to everyone associated the the. Case— the DA, Court staff, Trump lawyers. Trump wants to screech about illegal aliens or his steak being too rare, he could continue to do so.

A high profile gag order recently was the Roger Stone case. Given 1/6, and that Trump has already attacked the Judge and Prosecutor by name, and posted a picture of himself with a bat ready to hit a judge, this may be the best case for a gag order I’ve ever seen.

I would say I’ve never seen someone do so much to earn a gag order before they are even arraigned.

Untrue. Trump surrogates who are not actively involved with the case (witnesses and his lawyer) can defense all they want. A judge can shut Trump up, but there will be plenty of Gyms, MTGs, Boeberts, Lindsey and even his kids to tweet or go on TV and defend them.

You earn a gag order by threatening the judge, push misinformation, inciting violence. If Trump gets on, it’s his own fault.

Which allows the media to talk talk talk with no rebuttals