Anonymous
03/27/2023 12:49
Subject: Re:Seriously with the book banning ?
Anonymous wrote:Sure.
Democrats don't "ban books." They just have the publisher change words and phrases that may go against sensibilities.
We have to be inclusive!!!! And those "sensitivity readers" need a job!
https://www.npr.org/2023/02/21/1158347261/roald-dahl-books-changed-offensive-words
https://www.nationalreview.com/news/james-bond-books-undergo-edit-to-remove-offensive-language/
https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/news/agatha-christie-books-rewritten-b2308195.html
So you are against publishers modifying their own properties according to their own opinions of market forces? I.e. capitalism?
Anonymous
03/26/2023 21:20
Subject: Re:Seriously with the book banning ?
Sure.
Democrats don't "ban books." They just have the publisher change words and phrases that may go against sensibilities.
We have to be inclusive!!!! And those "sensitivity readers" need a job!
https://www.npr.org/2023/02/21/1158347261/roald-dahl-books-changed-offensive-words
https://www.nationalreview.com/news/james-bond-books-undergo-edit-to-remove-offensive-language/
https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/news/agatha-christie-books-rewritten-b2308195.html
Democrats don't "ban books." They just have the publisher change words and phrases that may go against sensibilities.
We have to be inclusive!!!! And those "sensitivity readers" need a job!
https://www.npr.org/2023/02/21/1158347261/roald-dahl-books-changed-offensive-words
https://www.nationalreview.com/news/james-bond-books-undergo-edit-to-remove-offensive-language/
https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/news/agatha-christie-books-rewritten-b2308195.html
Anonymous
03/26/2023 21:03
Subject: Seriously with the book banning ?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are you really trying to deny that books are being banned, when the whole point of this disgusting thing has been to ban books?
Keeping a book with sexual content out of a school library is not the same thing as banning a book. You are more than welcome to buy it and give it to your child.
Serious question, why do you think it’s the job of the school to provide material to help a child explore their sexuality? How did that become something the school is responsible for?
They're banning Toni Morrison.
They edited out that Rosa Parks' civil disobedience was against racism
This is the real deal. Republicans want to distract with silly nonsense about adult books that aren’t in any elementary school library and stuff lik Dr Seuss (since you all forgot: the family of/estate of Dr Seuss themselves decided it was time to change those books, that they no longer reflected how Dr Seuss would have written) but the point is that the fascists want to edit out actual history, get rid of any images and stories of LGBTQIA+ people and families just existing and any other multicultural or women’s history. They’re trying to erase all progress.
They try to distract with fake outage about “porn” but this is the long play.
No, the real issue is the extremism which is driving both parties further and further to the extremes which hurts everyone. Republicans want to ban everything they don't like and Democrats want to provide sexual material to children. Somehow public school systems worked fine for years without providing images of blow jobs to students. Democrats decided to label people who don't want to give pictures of blow jobs to kids (most parents) as fascist book banners and Republicans want to label gay people as groomers. Most sane people are tired of it.
Anonymous
03/26/2023 20:55
Subject: Re:Seriously with the book banning ?
Anonymous wrote:
Who said it was appropriate for 3rd grade? Nobody.
The statement was that it is not in the Loudoun County Schools library catalogue. Last I checked, that includes HS.
Why shouldn't it be provided to 3rd graders? Why do you support banning books to some children but not others?
Anonymous
03/26/2023 10:55
Subject: Seriously with the book banning ?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are you really trying to deny that books are being banned, when the whole point of this disgusting thing has been to ban books?
Keeping a book with sexual content out of a school library is not the same thing as banning a book. You are more than welcome to buy it and give it to your child.
Serious question, why do you think it’s the job of the school to provide material to help a child explore their sexuality? How did that become something the school is responsible for?
They're banning Toni Morrison.
They edited out that Rosa Parks' civil disobedience was against racism
This is the real deal. Republicans want to distract with silly nonsense about adult books that aren’t in any elementary school library and stuff lik Dr Seuss (since you all forgot: the family of/estate of Dr Seuss themselves decided it was time to change those books, that they no longer reflected how Dr Seuss would have written) but the point is that the fascists want to edit out actual history, get rid of any images and stories of LGBTQIA+ people and families just existing and any other multicultural or women’s history. They’re trying to erase all progress.
They try to distract with fake outage about “porn” but this is the long play.
Anonymous
03/26/2023 10:37
Subject: Re:Seriously with the book banning ?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Who said it was appropriate for 3rd grade? Nobody.
The statement was that it is not in the Loudoun County Schools library catalogue. Last I checked, that includes HS.
The implication is that the books being banned were in elementary schools because that is more sensationalizing to state that.
M
+1. They weren't in elementary schools.
Anonymous
03/26/2023 07:53
Subject: Seriously with the book banning ?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are you really trying to deny that books are being banned, when the whole point of this disgusting thing has been to ban books?
Keeping a book with sexual content out of a school library is not the same thing as banning a book. You are more than welcome to buy it and give it to your child.
Serious question, why do you think it’s the job of the school to provide material to help a child explore their sexuality? How did that become something the school is responsible for?
They're banning Toni Morrison.
They edited out that Rosa Parks' civil disobedience was against racism
This is the real deal. Republicans want to distract with silly nonsense about adult books that aren’t in any elementary school library and stuff lik Dr Seuss (since you all forgot: the family of/estate of Dr Seuss themselves decided it was time to change those books, that they no longer reflected how Dr Seuss would have written) but the point is that the fascists want to edit out actual history, get rid of any images and stories of LGBTQIA+ people and families just existing and any other multicultural or women’s history. They’re trying to erase all progress.
Anonymous
03/25/2023 14:05
Subject: Re:Seriously with the book banning ?
Anonymous wrote:
Who said it was appropriate for 3rd grade? Nobody.
The statement was that it is not in the Loudoun County Schools library catalogue. Last I checked, that includes HS.
The implication is that the books being banned were in elementary schools because that is more sensationalizing to state that.
M
Anonymous
03/25/2023 13:56
Subject: Re:Seriously with the book banning ?
Anonymous wrote:
Who said it was appropriate for 3rd grade? Nobody.
The statement was that it is not in the Loudoun County Schools library catalogue. Last I checked, that includes HS.
How many people do you think have read it under the age of 40?
Anonymous
03/25/2023 13:39
Subject: Re:Seriously with the book banning ?
Who said it was appropriate for 3rd grade? Nobody.
The statement was that it is not in the Loudoun County Schools library catalogue. Last I checked, that includes HS.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
03/23/2023 17:53
Subject: Seriously with the book banning ?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are you really trying to deny that books are being banned, when the whole point of this disgusting thing has been to ban books?
Keeping a book with sexual content out of a school library is not the same thing as banning a book. You are more than welcome to buy it and give it to your child.
Serious question, why do you think it’s the job of the school to provide material to help a child explore their sexuality? How did that become something the school is responsible for?
You never took sex ed?