Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What purportedly “intelligent” moms here are sharing about “conspiracies” makes me very reluctant to allow my children to go on play dates at UMC homes. You people need serious help.

Your assumption that these conspiracy theorists are moms is odd. This is the internet. They could be anyone who googled Charlie Kirk's name.

I am a mom and you can bet if my child was falsely accused like Tyler is being I would fight till the truth came out, even if the real murderer never had to face the consequences. I would make the truth crystal clear to everyone, and the real criminal would have to live knowing that everyone knows it wasn’t my child it was you.

Good grief.
So, when the trial happens and all the evidence is presented, and FBI agents and other testify to the evidence in court under the threat of perjury, and the defendant has an opportunity to mount a defense... you really think they are going to go with "he was falsely accused?"

I don’t think this will even make it to trial.

The evidence is overwhelming. But, if the state wants the death penalty, it will have to go to trial.

The evidence is such poor quality. This is terrifying.

They have video evidence, DNA evidence, forensic evidence, digital evidence which includes a confession.
This is far more evidence than investigators had for the monster who killed the 4 Idaho college students.
But, tell us about how it is of "such poor quality." You really are a nut.

There are potentially hundreds of suspects here, it was a crowded campus. The DNA could have been easily planted, do they have any evidence of him holding the gun? He didn’t confess in person.

They have the guy who killed Kirk. Why are you trying so desperately to make him innocent?

People who are trying to say Robinson was framed, from what side of the political spectrum are you coming from?

I feel like both sides are both trying to say he was framed and that he did it. This is the weirdest thing.

This is a nonpartisan issue.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The bodyguards failed miserably.

Oh, please. The bodyguard were there to stop people from rushing him or attacking him face to face.
They did not have security for a shooter that was 150 yards away.

Who are the bodyguards though? That day?

Can you please drop this issue about the bodyguards? If you want this information you'll have to find it elsewhere. Like in the many videos of the event, you could look at the obvious bodyguards and then try to figure out who they are if it's so very important to you.

Regardless, after this performance I think they'll need to change fields. Better security would mean Charlie Kirk would still be alive.

The identities and hand signals of the body guards matters tremendously here.

Hopefully the local LEO has looked into this. I would assume they have. But I think it is even safer to assume that the body guards were more concerned with crowd control or someone throwing a punch than a shooter. The school itself had zero security despite Utah laws. Keep in mind that a new state law (HB 128) went into effect in May 2025, allowing people with a concealed carry permit to openly carry firearms on college campuses. And still, neither a checkpoint not a metal detector in sight. They simply were not anticipating anything like this.

I'm willing to wager that those bodyguards are USSS or federal agents. Which then, of course, begs the question why federal agents are providing security for a podcaster.

And that's why no one is asking questions about the bodyguards or actively dissuading inqueries.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“I don’t care that he’s dead.”

“He’s not a hero.”

“He’s a scumbag.”

“He shouldn’t be celebrated.”

Do you have an issue with free speech?

People can say all these and still not commit murder.


I’m a lefty liberal and I’m against any political violence. It’s not only morally wrong. It hurts the cause. Nothing is ever solved with violence. It just causes more violence

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think that Tyler had some kind of slow mental deterioration over the past few years. He didn't have any prior issues with the law. His family was all MAGA. The MAGAs I know do not trust medical professionals and definitely do not trust mental health professionals. I'm willing to bet that the family knew that he was having mental health issues but did not attempt to get him any help. Maybe they shunned him because he was gay or whatever. They also supplied him with guns and taught him to shoot those guns with accuracy. They are partially responsible IMO. I don't think someone with mental health issues should be put to death.

The kid had a full ride scholarship for 4 years to do an engineering degree and dropped out after one semester. I think that says it all about his level of intelligence, mental state, and executive functioning. He's high functioning, but clearly had issues that his mom won't brag about on Facebook. Maybe its autism, depression, psychopathy, schizophrenia....who knows. Onset of mental health issues for men is usually in the 18 to 25 age range, so this matches up.

What I do know for a fact is that his family training him on firearm use from a young age is what enabled him to carry out this attack. Without that experience and knowledge, he probably would still be playing games at home and sucked into the dark corners of Discord while fuming against Charlie Kirk.

Firearms should be like tobacco and alcohol - don't expose your kids to it until they are 18. Most kids turn out fine, but so many of these mass shooters have lots of experience with guns before their 18th birthday because their parents exposed them and normalized shooting.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What purportedly “intelligent” moms here are sharing about “conspiracies” makes me very reluctant to allow my children to go on play dates at UMC homes. You people need serious help.

Your assumption that these conspiracy theorists are moms is odd. This is the internet. They could be anyone who googled Charlie Kirk's name.

I am a mom and you can bet if my child was falsely accused like Tyler is being I would fight till the truth came out, even if the real murderer never had to face the consequences. I would make the truth crystal clear to everyone, and the real criminal would have to live knowing that everyone knows it wasn’t my child it was you.

Good grief.
So, when the trial happens and all the evidence is presented, and FBI agents and other testify to the evidence in court under the threat of perjury, and the defendant has an opportunity to mount a defense... you really think they are going to go with "he was falsely accused?"

I don’t think this will even make it to trial.

The evidence is overwhelming. But, if the state wants the death penalty, it will have to go to trial.

The evidence is such poor quality. This is terrifying.

They have video evidence, DNA evidence, forensic evidence, digital evidence which includes a confession.
This is far more evidence than investigators had for the monster who killed the 4 Idaho college students.
But, tell us about how it is of "such poor quality." You really are a nut.

There are potentially hundreds of suspects here, it was a crowded campus. The DNA could have been easily planted, do they have any evidence of him holding the gun? He didn’t confess in person.

They have the guy who killed Kirk. Why are you trying so desperately to make him innocent?

People who are trying to say Robinson was framed, from what side of the political spectrum are you coming from?

I feel like both sides are both trying to say he was framed and that he did it. This is the weirdest thing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What purportedly “intelligent” moms here are sharing about “conspiracies” makes me very reluctant to allow my children to go on play dates at UMC homes. You people need serious help.

Your assumption that these conspiracy theorists are moms is odd. This is the internet. They could be anyone who googled Charlie Kirk's name.

I am a mom and you can bet if my child was falsely accused like Tyler is being I would fight till the truth came out, even if the real murderer never had to face the consequences. I would make the truth crystal clear to everyone, and the real criminal would have to live knowing that everyone knows it wasn’t my child it was you.

Good grief.
So, when the trial happens and all the evidence is presented, and FBI agents and other testify to the evidence in court under the threat of perjury, and the defendant has an opportunity to mount a defense... you really think they are going to go with "he was falsely accused?"

I don’t think this will even make it to trial.

The evidence is overwhelming. But, if the state wants the death penalty, it will have to go to trial.

The evidence is such poor quality. This is terrifying.

They have video evidence, DNA evidence, forensic evidence, digital evidence which includes a confession.
This is far more evidence than investigators had for the monster who killed the 4 Idaho college students.
But, tell us about how it is of "such poor quality." You really are a nut.

There are potentially hundreds of suspects here, it was a crowded campus. The DNA could have been easily planted, do they have any evidence of him holding the gun? He didn’t confess in person.

They have the guy who killed Kirk. Why are you trying so desperately to make him innocent?

People who are trying to say Robinson was framed, from what side of the political spectrum are you coming from?

I feel like both sides are both trying to say he was framed and that he did it. This is the weirdest thing.

WASHINGTON (AP) — Russia moved to amplify online conspiracy theories about Charlie Kirk’s killing just hours after it happened, seeding social media with the frightening claim that America is slipping into civil war.

Chinese and pro-Iranian groups also spread disinformation about the shooting, with those loyal to Iran’s interests backing antisemitic conspiracy theories while bots linked to Beijing claimed that Kirk’s death shows that the United States is violent, polarized and dysfunctional.

America’s adversaries have long used fake social media accounts, online bots and disinformation to depict the U.S. as a dangerous country beset with extremism and gun violence. Kirk’s killing has provided another opportunity for those overseas eager to shape public understanding while inflaming political polarization.

“Charlie Kirk’s Death and the Coming Civil War,” tweeted Russian ultranationalist Alexander Dugin, whose influence earned him the moniker “ Putin’s brain,” referring to Russia’s president. Pro-Russian bots blamed Democrats and predicted more violence. Russian state media published English-language articles with headlines claiming a conspiracy orchestrated by shadowy forces: “Was Charlie Kirk’s Killer a Pro?”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think that Tyler had some kind of slow mental deterioration over the past few years. He didn't have any prior issues with the law. His family was all MAGA. The MAGAs I know do not trust medical professionals and definitely do not trust mental health professionals. I'm willing to bet that the family knew that he was having mental health issues but did not attempt to get him any help. Maybe they shunned him because he was gay or whatever. They also supplied him with guns and taught him to shoot those guns with accuracy. They are partially responsible IMO. I don't think someone with mental health issues should be put to death.

He is a lot like many of the liberals on this site. Bought into the crazy liberal values and rejected his family.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What purportedly “intelligent” moms here are sharing about “conspiracies” makes me very reluctant to allow my children to go on play dates at UMC homes. You people need serious help.

Your assumption that these conspiracy theorists are moms is odd. This is the internet. They could be anyone who googled Charlie Kirk's name.

I am a mom and you can bet if my child was falsely accused like Tyler is being I would fight till the truth came out, even if the real murderer never had to face the consequences. I would make the truth crystal clear to everyone, and the real criminal would have to live knowing that everyone knows it wasn’t my child it was you.

Good grief.
So, when the trial happens and all the evidence is presented, and FBI agents and other testify to the evidence in court under the threat of perjury, and the defendant has an opportunity to mount a defense... you really think they are going to go with "he was falsely accused?"

I don’t think this will even make it to trial.

The evidence is overwhelming. But, if the state wants the death penalty, it will have to go to trial.

The evidence is such poor quality. This is terrifying.

They have video evidence, DNA evidence, forensic evidence, digital evidence which includes a confession.
This is far more evidence than investigators had for the monster who killed the 4 Idaho college students.
But, tell us about how it is of "such poor quality." You really are a nut.

There are potentially hundreds of suspects here, it was a crowded campus. The DNA could have been easily planted, do they have any evidence of him holding the gun? He didn’t confess in person.

They have the guy who killed Kirk. Why are you trying so desperately to make him innocent?

Anonymous wrote:“I don’t care that he’s dead.”

“He’s not a hero.”

“He’s a scumbag.”

“He shouldn’t be celebrated.”

Anonymous wrote:I think that Tyler had some kind of slow mental deterioration over the past few years. He didn't have any prior issues with the law. His family was all MAGA. The MAGAs I know do not trust medical professionals and definitely do not trust mental health professionals. I'm willing to bet that the family knew that he was having mental health issues but did not attempt to get him any help. Maybe they shunned him because he was gay or whatever. They also supplied him with guns and taught him to shoot those guns with accuracy. They are partially responsible IMO. I don't think someone with mental health issues should be put to death.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What purportedly “intelligent” moms here are sharing about “conspiracies” makes me very reluctant to allow my children to go on play dates at UMC homes. You people need serious help.

Your assumption that these conspiracy theorists are moms is odd. This is the internet. They could be anyone who googled Charlie Kirk's name.

I am a mom and you can bet if my child was falsely accused like Tyler is being I would fight till the truth came out, even if the real murderer never had to face the consequences. I would make the truth crystal clear to everyone, and the real criminal would have to live knowing that everyone knows it wasn’t my child it was you.

Good grief.
So, when the trial happens and all the evidence is presented, and FBI agents and other testify to the evidence in court under the threat of perjury, and the defendant has an opportunity to mount a defense... you really think they are going to go with "he was falsely accused?"

I don’t think this will even make it to trial.

The evidence is overwhelming. But, if the state wants the death penalty, it will have to go to trial.

The evidence is such poor quality. This is terrifying.

They have video evidence, DNA evidence, forensic evidence, digital evidence which includes a confession.
This is far more evidence than investigators had for the monster who killed the 4 Idaho college students.
But, tell us about how it is of "such poor quality." You really are a nut.

There are potentially hundreds of suspects here, it was a crowded campus. The DNA could have been easily planted, do they have any evidence of him holding the gun? He didn’t confess in person.

They have the guy who killed Kirk. Why are you trying so desperately to make him innocent?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has anyone been following the Bill Akerman Hamptons meeting thing?

It’s wild! Apparently, her post had been taken down but she reposted. As the saying goes, she should be protected at all costs. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DOpTNQYiPiH/

Apparently it was some type of intervention with very powerful and rich people for Charlie Kirk because he was starting to shift his position on Israel and was platforming anti Zionist speakers. These are the same people who are conspiring against mamdani as well

Anyone know the time frame from when the meeting was held (in the Hamptons, as in East End LI?) and the rally? Did Kirk go to Israel after that meeting? Allegedly, he was “invited” for rewiring because he flipped on Israel. Conflicting info all around this hot mess of leaky deets. I trust CO!

This meeting was the day right before Charlie's interview with Megan Kelly where he was complaining about being called antisemitic for criticism of Israel and complaining about his Jewish donors mistreatment of him.