Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sure it can be! They could have illegally obtained tax records and are lying about the content.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unless he has done something illegal the only story here is 1. He has taken advantage of the tax codes 2. He may have to sell assets to cover his debt balloon payments and 3. His track record of business failures is continuing.
Lots of “something illegal” detailed in the article. You should read it.
The NYT doesn't have a good record. I guess Trump doesn't have to release his taxes since the NYT has them, lol!
Even Rachel M. showed his 2005 tax return which didn't back up any allegations. To her credit she actually showed the viewers the product.
Trump is on twitter saying it’s fake news and that the returns were illegally obtained. Can’t be both.
well, that would be easy to prove, he can just release his tax returns, like any president or candidate in the past few decades, easy peasy
Do you support the illegal obtaining by media of someone’s tax records?Do you support blackmail? The source is probably an IRS employee
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sure it can be! They could have illegally obtained tax records and are lying about the content.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unless he has done something illegal the only story here is 1. He has taken advantage of the tax codes 2. He may have to sell assets to cover his debt balloon payments and 3. His track record of business failures is continuing.
Lots of “something illegal” detailed in the article. You should read it.
The NYT doesn't have a good record. I guess Trump doesn't have to release his taxes since the NYT has them, lol!
Even Rachel M. showed his 2005 tax return which didn't back up any allegations. To her credit she actually showed the viewers the product.
Trump is on twitter saying it’s fake news and that the returns were illegally obtained. Can’t be both.
Then he could point out where they’re incorrect and sue them for defamation...it’s not like he doesn’t have lawyers galore. But he didn’t...because it’s all true
Anonymous wrote:The non-payment of taxes is not the issue. Trump's insolvency is the issue. He is broke. And he has even bigger debts, to "foreign" creditors, coming due. This is a national security threat, even bigger than he already poses.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sure it can be! They could have illegally obtained tax records and are lying about the content.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unless he has done something illegal the only story here is 1. He has taken advantage of the tax codes 2. He may have to sell assets to cover his debt balloon payments and 3. His track record of business failures is continuing.
Lots of “something illegal” detailed in the article. You should read it.
The NYT doesn't have a good record. I guess Trump doesn't have to release his taxes since the NYT has them, lol!
Even Rachel M. showed his 2005 tax return which didn't back up any allegations. To her credit she actually showed the viewers the product.
Trump is on twitter saying it’s fake news and that the returns were illegally obtained. Can’t be both.
well, that would be easy to prove, he can just release his tax returns, like any president or candidate in the past few decades, easy peasy
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:30+ pages and no speculation about whom the source might be! Any guesses?
Mary Trump.
unlikely. she would have no reason to have his recent tax documents. she did provide a trove of documents to the NY but they were from her lawsuit in 2000 I think and they were old documents.
Anonymous wrote:Sure it can be! They could have illegally obtained tax records and are lying about the content.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unless he has done something illegal the only story here is 1. He has taken advantage of the tax codes 2. He may have to sell assets to cover his debt balloon payments and 3. His track record of business failures is continuing.
Lots of “something illegal” detailed in the article. You should read it.
The NYT doesn't have a good record. I guess Trump doesn't have to release his taxes since the NYT has them, lol!
Even Rachel M. showed his 2005 tax return which didn't back up any allegations. To her credit she actually showed the viewers the product.
Trump is on twitter saying it’s fake news and that the returns were illegally obtained. Can’t be both.
Anonymous wrote:Sure it can be! They could have illegally obtained tax records and are lying about the content.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unless he has done something illegal the only story here is 1. He has taken advantage of the tax codes 2. He may have to sell assets to cover his debt balloon payments and 3. His track record of business failures is continuing.
Lots of “something illegal” detailed in the article. You should read it.
The NYT doesn't have a good record. I guess Trump doesn't have to release his taxes since the NYT has them, lol!
Even Rachel M. showed his 2005 tax return which didn't back up any allegations. To her credit she actually showed the viewers the product.
Trump is on twitter saying it’s fake news and that the returns were illegally obtained. Can’t be both.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:30+ pages and no speculation about whom the source might be! Any guesses?
Mary Trump.
Sure it can be! They could have illegally obtained tax records and are lying about the content.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unless he has done something illegal the only story here is 1. He has taken advantage of the tax codes 2. He may have to sell assets to cover his debt balloon payments and 3. His track record of business failures is continuing.
Lots of “something illegal” detailed in the article. You should read it.
The NYT doesn't have a good record. I guess Trump doesn't have to release his taxes since the NYT has them, lol!
Even Rachel M. showed his 2005 tax return which didn't back up any allegations. To her credit she actually showed the viewers the product.
Trump is on twitter saying it’s fake news and that the returns were illegally obtained. Can’t be both.
Anonymous wrote:The non-payment of taxes is not the issue. Trump's insolvency is the issue. He is broke. And he has even bigger debts, to "foreign" creditors, coming due. This is a national security threat, even bigger than he already poses.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unless he has done something illegal the only story here is 1. He has taken advantage of the tax codes 2. He may have to sell assets to cover his debt balloon payments and 3. His track record of business failures is continuing.
Lots of “something illegal” detailed in the article. You should read it.
The NYT doesn't have a good record. I guess Trump doesn't have to release his taxes since the NYT has them, lol!
Even Rachel M. showed his 2005 tax return which didn't back up any allegations. To her credit she actually showed the viewers the product.
Lying, deflecting, denying and casting doubt on the New York Times is running the autocrat’s playbook using Roy Cohn’s tactics of undermining the credibility of the media outlets to serve your purpose. Congrats on falling for the oldest Mob tactic on the books.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder if the government already worked out a deal with trump. Don’t take a paycheck, make a lot of money for our country and all will be forgiven. I guess we will wait and see.
The government has not worked out anything with Trump, because the dispute over his audit is still sitting in the offices of the joint tax committee. They have not adjudicated it.
JTC plays no role in audit.
Portions of Trump's refunds are before the JTC. That is because Title 26 (I don't remember the section) mandates that all refunds in excess of 10 million dollars be forwarded to the JTC. The thinking in enacting this was not to "adjudicate" or "approve"anything. It is so the JTC could figure out where they had miswritten the law. Large refunds like those tend to suggest the laws aren't working as intended.
Thank you for clarifying!