Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is s case of sweeping under the carpet Deny, deny, deny --and demand evidence that the victim could not provide.
Should they have rounded up every seventh and grade boy and accused them individually? If there had been an immediate claim, something could have been done. But that didn't happen. And that unfortunately means that the allegation cannot be proved at this time unless a credible lead emerges. And it appears that one has not.
While we would have liked the case to be solved, most of the anger is about how GDS has mishandled their response. The company they hired for their “independent investigation.” Their secrecy about what exactly that investigation was and the results. In addition to their awful forced statements. Being unwilling to share info with the victim and his family.
Exactly this. Long time GDS parent here. 100 percent agree. How do we let our displeasure be known?
People should band together and walk, don't keep giving them your money which is an investment, you don't keep investing in a questionable stock. Your child is more important than money or a stock why would you keep sending your child somewhere where they already botched up their most important job to watch over them as they educate them. This isn't the first time these people have screwed up. Stop putting the hope of more money and power ahead of your child.
Anonymous wrote:Eww. I heard application numbers are up so I doubt they will suffer. "Yes, I'd love to join GDS and be in this allegedly unsafe environment. Sign me up! Also can I make an extra large donation?"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is s case of sweeping under the carpet Deny, deny, deny --and demand evidence that the victim could not provide.
Alleged victim.
If they have evidence that this was made up then they should spit it out. The family opened themselves up with the email and GDS has every incentive under the sun to show that it was false or exaggerated.
That's only an argument in favor of releasing the report. The report is more likely to exonerate the school than not.
There is absolutely no evidence that this did happen
Which should have made this easy, assuming there was a good faith effort to look.
Do you have evidence that the police who did the investigation “to look” at this alleged crime did not do so in good faith? Please share if so.
I don't know. The police have their own limitations and Winter 24-25 was an exceptionally busy time for them. There was also at least one poster here that claimed that GDS couldn't let the police look at anything or interview anyone for "privacy" reasons.
The good news is that GDS' own non-privileged 3rd party investigation wouldn't have had any of those potential limitations and should easily show that a good faith effort was made.
The level of effort being put into not providing simple details like # of people interviewed or sharing a redacted version of the report with the family does not make sense.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is s case of sweeping under the carpet Deny, deny, deny --and demand evidence that the victim could not provide.
Alleged victim.
If they have evidence that this was made up then they should spit it out. The family opened themselves up with the email and GDS has every incentive under the sun to show that it was false or exaggerated.
That's only an argument in favor of releasing the report. The report is more likely to exonerate the school than not.
There is absolutely no evidence that this did happen
Which should have made this easy, assuming there was a good faith effort to look.
Do you have evidence that the police who did the investigation “to look” at this alleged crime did not do so in good faith? Please share if so.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is s case of sweeping under the carpet Deny, deny, deny --and demand evidence that the victim could not provide.
Should they have rounded up every seventh and grade boy and accused them individually? If there had been an immediate claim, something could have been done. But that didn't happen. And that unfortunately means that the allegation cannot be proved at this time unless a credible lead emerges. And it appears that one has not.
While we would have liked the case to be solved, most of the anger is about how GDS has mishandled their response. The company they hired for their “independent investigation.” Their secrecy about what exactly that investigation was and the results. In addition to their awful forced statements. Being unwilling to share info with the victim and his family.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is s case of sweeping under the carpet Deny, deny, deny --and demand evidence that the victim could not provide.
Alleged victim.
If they have evidence that this was made up then they should spit it out. The family opened themselves up with the email and GDS has every incentive under the sun to show that it was false or exaggerated.
That's only an argument in favor of releasing the report. The report is more likely to exonerate the school than not.
There is absolutely no evidence that this did happen
Which should have made this easy, assuming there was a good faith effort to look.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is s case of sweeping under the carpet Deny, deny, deny --and demand evidence that the victim could not provide.
Alleged victim.
If they have evidence that this was made up then they should spit it out. The family opened themselves up with the email and GDS has every incentive under the sun to show that it was false or exaggerated.
That's only an argument in favor of releasing the report. The report is more likely to exonerate the school than not.
There is absolutely no evidence that this did happen
Anonymous wrote:Sounds made up to me. Maybe if was one kid, but as strict and disciplined things are at GDS, you won’t find two kids that would do that. I call BS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is s case of sweeping under the carpet Deny, deny, deny --and demand evidence that the victim could not provide.
Alleged victim.
If they have evidence that this was made up then they should spit it out. The family opened themselves up with the email and GDS has every incentive under the sun to show that it was false or exaggerated.
That's only an argument in favor of releasing the report. The report is more likely to exonerate the school than not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is s case of sweeping under the carpet Deny, deny, deny --and demand evidence that the victim could not provide.
Should they have rounded up every seventh and grade boy and accused them individually? If there had been an immediate claim, something could have been done. But that didn't happen. And that unfortunately means that the allegation cannot be proved at this time unless a credible lead emerges. And it appears that one has not.
While we would have liked the case to be solved, most of the anger is about how GDS has mishandled their response. The company they hired for their “independent investigation.” Their secrecy about what exactly that investigation was and the results. In addition to their awful forced statements. Being unwilling to share info with the victim and his family.
Exactly this. Long time GDS parent here. 100 percent agree. How do we let our displeasure be known?
I have no connection with GDS whatsoever, but the answer to your question is obvious. Ask for a meeting with the HOS and demand answers to your questions.
Silly. Anyone will just be blown off.