Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t believe the Reddit rumor, but I wouldn’t be surprised if the SEC instituted a new ad hoc telework policy that only allows ad hoc telework to earn credit hours beyond your official work hours.
Maybe. If even that were forbidden, it would create real problems.
I not infrequently have briefs due and need to work extra hours, but I cannot stay at the office until all hours because of kids. If I wasn’t able to log in once they are asleep, it’s not clear how the work would get done.
People need to just stop working and let them feel the consequences of their stupidity.
Anonymous wrote:What is the OBSESSION with telework (not allowing it)???? Cruelty doesn’t explain it — there many other, better ways to make people miserable and boost departures, if that’s the objective.
This weird fetish with stopping telework is getting to the point of a psychological disorder. I suspect something else is going on. It’s totally random. The damn thing has been around for DECADES, and now, out of the blue, everyone suddenly has a hair up their butt about it?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t believe the Reddit rumor, but I wouldn’t be surprised if the SEC instituted a new ad hoc telework policy that only allows ad hoc telework to earn credit hours beyond your official work hours.
Maybe. If even that were forbidden, it would create real problems.
I not infrequently have briefs due and need to work extra hours, but I cannot stay at the office until all hours because of kids. If I wasn’t able to log in once they are asleep, it’s not clear how the work would get done.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t believe the Reddit rumor, but I wouldn’t be surprised if the SEC instituted a new ad hoc telework policy that only allows ad hoc telework to earn credit hours beyond your official work hours.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Someone on reddit said adhoc telework is going away completely. Dudes username was Gullible-Cream, tho, so wondering if anyone can verify?
https://www.reddit.com/r/fednews/comments/1kruzr3/comment/mth3umj/?context=3
Guy claims to be “90% sure” for whatever that is worth
I guess that’s just something else that the PP’s hero “didn’t want to start a fight over.”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So I guess no ad-hoc for snow storms either? Or is this one of those “we cherry pick and enforce only those provisions of the CBA that we like” exercises?
If there's no ad hoc I would set up a new schedule without TW. No point in agreeing to TW if it is only for the benefit of the agency.
Anonymous wrote:So I guess no ad-hoc for snow storms either? Or is this one of those “we cherry pick and enforce only those provisions of the CBA that we like” exercises?