Anonymous
Post 07/14/2025 09:18     Subject: FCPS Boundary Review Updates

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Stone would not have enough kids for an AAP program. The "center" only sends 20-30 kids per grade to Rocky Run. Someone posted about it earlier.

Are you proposing completely doing away with AAP? That's a different suggestion.



Not at all. Saying "Every middle school should have an AAP program" is the opposite of suggesting that AAP should be eliminated entirely.


Rocky Run only has 670 students that would go to Chantilly for HS as per the 2024-25 FCPS dashboards. Franklin is a big feed to Chantilly. The reality is Rocky Run with AAP only for the base school should be a single feed to Chantilly HS. Wherever FCPS can do a concise logical pyramid it should be done.

A rare occasion when MS capacity matches a HS capacity net TJ. That's why I posted that the split feeder for Carson should be Herndon pyramid.


I know kids who can walk to Franklin MS and are a 5 minute drive to Chantilly HS. Are you suggesting that those kids should be sent to a different MS, Rocky Run, so that they can go to the HS that is close by?

The borders in the Western part of the county are a mess because of the population density and how close the various ES, MS, and HS are located. Franklin MS attends Chantilly HS and Oakton HS. Rocky Run feeds Chantilly.

Looking at the Western HS that I think people are discussing. Pulling data from Wikipedia, so potentially outdated:

Centerville: Liberty
Chantilly: Carson, Franklin
Herndon: Herndon MS
Oakton: Carson, Jackson, Franklin, Kilmer
South Lakes: Hughes, Carson
Westfield: Carson

Carson needs to be streamlined to the new school, which would relieve Chantilly, and Westfield. It would pull some students from Oakton and a small number from SL, mainly the Floris kids and Fox Mill kids.

Now Chantilly is pulling only from Franklin, Oakton is down to two MS, and South Lakes is pulling from Hughes. Westfield is smaller and has space to pull in from other schools that are nearby and need relief.












If you are basing your "ideas" on info you found in Wikipedia, you aren't informed enough to have an opinion worth sharing.
Anonymous
Post 07/14/2025 09:16     Subject: FCPS Boundary Review Updates

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Stone would not have enough kids for an AAP program. The "center" only sends 20-30 kids per grade to Rocky Run. Someone posted about it earlier.

Are you proposing completely doing away with AAP? That's a different suggestion.



Not at all. Saying "Every middle school should have an AAP program" is the opposite of suggesting that AAP should be eliminated entirely.


Rocky Run only has 670 students that would go to Chantilly for HS as per the 2024-25 FCPS dashboards. Franklin is a big feed to Chantilly. The reality is Rocky Run with AAP only for the base school should be a single feed to Chantilly HS. Wherever FCPS can do a concise logical pyramid it should be done.

A rare occasion when MS capacity matches a HS capacity net TJ. That's why I posted that the split feeder for Carson should be Herndon pyramid.


That last sentence makes no sense. How would that work?


It makes sense based on MS/HS capacities with all at 100% of program capacity:

Carson 1430 gr 7/8 *2=2860 for any coo of high schools and Herndon makes more sense than Oakton geographically. KAA est 2100-2860=-760. Estimate capacity deficit if Carson feeds KAA 100%.
Herndon 1062 gr 7/8*2=2124. Herndon HS 2749 -2124=625 capacity surplus at Herndon HS.

Herndon MS transfers all AAP to Hughes now.


The closest Herndon High kids to Carson live by Herndon Middle School. This would not work at all.


Hutchison https://www.fcps.edu/sites/default/files/Coates-Area-Boundary-Maps.pdf

hutchison ES is 1.3 miles from Herndon MS. Some spa s are between that ES and MS. Frankly at 95% capacity Hutchison has 12 trailers. Surplus? Storage? If used for instruction the program capacity is overstated. Herndon needs to stem the transfer tide and AAP at the middle school will help along with a 2nd site for Global STEM.

Harder problem to solve is Oakton HS and middle school, Marshall/Madison. And the wacky Thru junk putting walkes on buses.
Plus some SPA s have not been split in over 30 years. Case in point is one giant in Tysons.


I'm not being mean, but I really don't understand your point. What are you suggesting?

The one thing I do "get" from your post is that FCPS has royally screwed up on school enrollment predictions.
Anonymous
Post 07/14/2025 09:07     Subject: FCPS Boundary Review Updates

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Stone would not have enough kids for an AAP program. The "center" only sends 20-30 kids per grade to Rocky Run. Someone posted about it earlier.

Are you proposing completely doing away with AAP? That's a different suggestion.



Not at all. Saying "Every middle school should have an AAP program" is the opposite of suggesting that AAP should be eliminated entirely.


Rocky Run only has 670 students that would go to Chantilly for HS as per the 2024-25 FCPS dashboards. Franklin is a big feed to Chantilly. The reality is Rocky Run with AAP only for the base school should be a single feed to Chantilly HS. Wherever FCPS can do a concise logical pyramid it should be done.

A rare occasion when MS capacity matches a HS capacity net TJ. That's why I posted that the split feeder for Carson should be Herndon pyramid.


I know kids who can walk to Franklin MS and are a 5 minute drive to Chantilly HS. Are you suggesting that those kids should be sent to a different MS, Rocky Run, so that they can go to the HS that is close by?

The borders in the Western part of the county are a mess because of the population density and how close the various ES, MS, and HS are located. Franklin MS attends Chantilly HS and Oakton HS. Rocky Run feeds Chantilly.

Looking at the Western HS that I think people are discussing. Pulling data from Wikipedia, so potentially outdated:

Centerville: Liberty
Chantilly: Carson, Franklin
Herndon: Herndon MS
Oakton: Carson, Jackson, Franklin, Kilmer
South Lakes: Hughes, Carson
Westfield: Carson

Carson needs to be streamlined to the new school, which would relieve Chantilly, and Westfield. It would pull some students from Oakton and a small number from SL, mainly the Floris kids and Fox Mill kids.

Now Chantilly is pulling only from Franklin, Oakton is down to two MS, and South Lakes is pulling from Hughes. Westfield is smaller and has space to pull in from other schools that are nearby and need relief.










Anonymous
Post 07/14/2025 09:07     Subject: FCPS Boundary Review Updates

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Stone would not have enough kids for an AAP program. The "center" only sends 20-30 kids per grade to Rocky Run. Someone posted about it earlier.

Are you proposing completely doing away with AAP? That's a different suggestion.



Not at all. Saying "Every middle school should have an AAP program" is the opposite of suggesting that AAP should be eliminated entirely.


Rocky Run only has 670 students that would go to Chantilly for HS as per the 2024-25 FCPS dashboards. Franklin is a big feed to Chantilly. The reality is Rocky Run with AAP only for the base school should be a single feed to Chantilly HS. Wherever FCPS can do a concise logical pyramid it should be done.

A rare occasion when MS capacity matches a HS capacity net TJ. That's why I posted that the split feeder for Carson should be Herndon pyramid.


That last sentence makes no sense. How would that work?


It makes sense based on MS/HS capacities with all at 100% of program capacity:

Carson 1430 gr 7/8 *2=2860 for any coo of high schools and Herndon makes more sense than Oakton geographically. KAA est 2100-2860=-760. Estimate capacity deficit if Carson feeds KAA 100%.
Herndon 1062 gr 7/8*2=2124. Herndon HS 2749 -2124=625 capacity surplus at Herndon HS.

Herndon MS transfers all AAP to Hughes now.


The closest Herndon High kids to Carson live by Herndon Middle School. This would not work at all.


Hutchison https://www.fcps.edu/sites/default/files/Coates-Area-Boundary-Maps.pdf

hutchison ES is 1.3 miles from Herndon MS. Some spa s are between that ES and MS. Frankly at 95% capacity Hutchison has 12 trailers. Surplus? Storage? If used for instruction the program capacity is overstated. Herndon needs to stem the transfer tide and AAP at the middle school will help along with a 2nd site for Global STEM.

Harder problem to solve is Oakton HS and middle school, Marshall/Madison. And the wacky Thru junk putting walkes on buses.
Plus some SPA s have not been split in over 30 years. Case in point is one giant in Tysons.
Anonymous
Post 07/14/2025 08:54     Subject: Re:FCPS Boundary Review Updates

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don’t think the goal is to eliminate all split feeders. The goal is to eliminate the sliver splits. The ones where only a few students split off - like 10%. Those could be eliminated or expanded such that a higher percentage of a MS or ES class goes to the same school.


What's frustrating is that Thru was hired and not given clear guidelines and priorities. If FCPS had told them "no split feeders, that's the first priority" or "no over capacity schools, that's the first priority" then the maps would make sense and we could guess what was going to happen next.

They were given priorities. Top priority is removing attendance islands, which is the objective of Scenario 1. Next priority is reducing split feeders, specifically in instances where the split is less than 20 (or is it 30)%, so Scenario 2 is Scenario 1 plus split feeder mitigation. Third priority is capacity exceeding 105%, and Scenario 3 is Scenario 2 plus capacity shuffling.

Now, do they do this with any nuance or understanding of walk zones, community cohesion, or access across major roads and highways? No. But they technically do have priorities and have presented them as such.


Well, THRU violated the first two egregiously with my neighborhood.
Anonymous
Post 07/14/2025 08:30     Subject: Re:FCPS Boundary Review Updates

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don’t think the goal is to eliminate all split feeders. The goal is to eliminate the sliver splits. The ones where only a few students split off - like 10%. Those could be eliminated or expanded such that a higher percentage of a MS or ES class goes to the same school.


What's frustrating is that Thru was hired and not given clear guidelines and priorities. If FCPS had told them "no split feeders, that's the first priority" or "no over capacity schools, that's the first priority" then the maps would make sense and we could guess what was going to happen next.

They were given priorities. Top priority is removing attendance islands, which is the objective of Scenario 1. Next priority is reducing split feeders, specifically in instances where the split is less than 20 (or is it 30)%, so Scenario 2 is Scenario 1 plus split feeder mitigation. Third priority is capacity exceeding 105%, and Scenario 3 is Scenario 2 plus capacity shuffling.

Now, do they do this with any nuance or understanding of walk zones, community cohesion, or access across major roads and highways? No. But they technically do have priorities and have presented them as such.
Anonymous
Post 07/14/2025 08:22     Subject: Re:FCPS Boundary Review Updates

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don’t think the goal is to eliminate all split feeders. The goal is to eliminate the sliver splits. The ones where only a few students split off - like 10%. Those could be eliminated or expanded such that a higher percentage of a MS or ES class goes to the same school.


Not sure why THRU didn't address our middle school, which feeds to four high schools. Hopefully KAA will address this.


I see it as splitting between South Lakes and KAA. Make Franklin a center, as well, and there will likely be room for the Oak Hill kids--that would remove Lee's Corner and Navy center kids.
Anonymous
Post 07/14/2025 08:14     Subject: FCPS Boundary Review Updates

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Stone would not have enough kids for an AAP program. The "center" only sends 20-30 kids per grade to Rocky Run. Someone posted about it earlier.

Are you proposing completely doing away with AAP? That's a different suggestion.



Not at all. Saying "Every middle school should have an AAP program" is the opposite of suggesting that AAP should be eliminated entirely.


Rocky Run only has 670 students that would go to Chantilly for HS as per the 2024-25 FCPS dashboards. Franklin is a big feed to Chantilly. The reality is Rocky Run with AAP only for the base school should be a single feed to Chantilly HS. Wherever FCPS can do a concise logical pyramid it should be done.

A rare occasion when MS capacity matches a HS capacity net TJ. That's why I posted that the split feeder for Carson should be Herndon pyramid.


That last sentence makes no sense. How would that work?


It makes sense based on MS/HS capacities with all at 100% of program capacity:

Carson 1430 gr 7/8 *2=2860 for any coo of high schools and Herndon makes more sense than Oakton geographically. KAA est 2100-2860=-760. Estimate capacity deficit if Carson feeds KAA 100%.
Herndon 1062 gr 7/8*2=2124. Herndon HS 2749 -2124=625 capacity surplus at Herndon HS.

Herndon MS transfers all AAP to Hughes now.


The closest Herndon High kids to Carson live by Herndon Middle School. This would not work at all.
Anonymous
Post 07/14/2025 08:14     Subject: Re:FCPS Boundary Review Updates

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think the goal is to eliminate all split feeders. The goal is to eliminate the sliver splits. The ones where only a few students split off - like 10%. Those could be eliminated or expanded such that a higher percentage of a MS or ES class goes to the same school.


Not sure why THRU didn't address our middle school, which feeds to four high schools. Hopefully KAA will address this.
Anonymous
Post 07/14/2025 08:03     Subject: FCPS Boundary Review Updates

Without getting rid of IB and other HS transfers like language or secret reasons and actually doing residency checks, its all just a dog and pony show.
Anonymous
Post 07/14/2025 08:00     Subject: Re:FCPS Boundary Review Updates

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think the goal is to eliminate all split feeders. The goal is to eliminate the sliver splits. The ones where only a few students split off - like 10%. Those could be eliminated or expanded such that a higher percentage of a MS or ES class goes to the same school.


What's frustrating is that Thru was hired and not given clear guidelines and priorities. If FCPS had told them "no split feeders, that's the first priority" or "no over capacity schools, that's the first priority" then the maps would make sense and we could guess what was going to happen next.
Anonymous
Post 07/14/2025 07:50     Subject: FCPS Boundary Review Updates

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Stone would not have enough kids for an AAP program. The "center" only sends 20-30 kids per grade to Rocky Run. Someone posted about it earlier.

Are you proposing completely doing away with AAP? That's a different suggestion.



Not at all. Saying "Every middle school should have an AAP program" is the opposite of suggesting that AAP should be eliminated entirely.


Rocky Run only has 670 students that would go to Chantilly for HS as per the 2024-25 FCPS dashboards. Franklin is a big feed to Chantilly. The reality is Rocky Run with AAP only for the base school should be a single feed to Chantilly HS. Wherever FCPS can do a concise logical pyramid it should be done.

A rare occasion when MS capacity matches a HS capacity net TJ. That's why I posted that the split feeder for Carson should be Herndon pyramid.


That last sentence makes no sense. How would that work?


It makes sense based on MS/HS capacities with all at 100% of program capacity:

Carson 1430 gr 7/8 *2=2860 for any coo of high schools and Herndon makes more sense than Oakton geographically. KAA est 2100-2860=-760. Estimate capacity deficit if Carson feeds KAA 100%.
Herndon 1062 gr 7/8*2=2124. Herndon HS 2749 -2124=625 capacity surplus at Herndon HS.

Herndon MS transfers all AAP to Hughes now.
Anonymous
Post 07/14/2025 07:25     Subject: Re:FCPS Boundary Review Updates

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think the goal is to eliminate all split feeders. The goal is to eliminate the sliver splits. The ones where only a few students split off - like 10%. Those could be eliminated or expanded such that a higher percentage of a MS or ES class goes to the same school.


Hopefully eliminate double split feeders (where the kids are a sliver or minority split twice) and keep elementary school blocks together.
Anonymous
Post 07/14/2025 07:22     Subject: Re:FCPS Boundary Review Updates

I don’t think the goal is to eliminate all split feeders. The goal is to eliminate the sliver splits. The ones where only a few students split off - like 10%. Those could be eliminated or expanded such that a higher percentage of a MS or ES class goes to the same school.
Anonymous
Post 07/14/2025 07:09     Subject: FCPS Boundary Review Updates

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Stone would not have enough kids for an AAP program. The "center" only sends 20-30 kids per grade to Rocky Run. Someone posted about it earlier.

Are you proposing completely doing away with AAP? That's a different suggestion.



Not at all. Saying "Every middle school should have an AAP program" is the opposite of suggesting that AAP should be eliminated entirely.


Rocky Run only has 670 students that would go to Chantilly for HS as per the 2024-25 FCPS dashboards. Franklin is a big feed to Chantilly. The reality is Rocky Run with AAP only for the base school should be a single feed to Chantilly HS. Wherever FCPS can do a concise logical pyramid it should be done.

A rare occasion when MS capacity matches a HS capacity net TJ. That's why I posted that the split feeder for Carson should be Herndon pyramid.


That last sentence makes no sense. How would that work?