Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the call to Georgia officials is still the most damning evidence of POTUS criminal liability for the seditious conspiracy. I’m sure there’s more of that kind of evidence that we haven’t seen yet. The rabble rousing on the hill was just the tip of the iceberg so to speak.
Correct, because it's easier to prove his intent was to force election fraud. Trump's involvement in Jan 6 will be harder to prove in terms of intent. I don't think we'll find a smoking gun among the docs given to the Committee - plenty of circumstantial evidence, of course, but nothing that rises to the level of "find me X number of votes that I am short of".
Anonymous wrote:I think the call to Georgia officials is still the most damning evidence of POTUS criminal liability for the seditious conspiracy. I’m sure there’s more of that kind of evidence that we haven’t seen yet. The rabble rousing on the hill was just the tip of the iceberg so to speak.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the call to Georgia officials is still the most damning evidence of POTUS criminal liability for the seditious conspiracy. I’m sure there’s more of that kind of evidence that we haven’t seen yet. The rabble rousing on the hill was just the tip of the iceberg so to speak.
Nah. The phone call from Trump to Pence is even clearer and proves that he was trying to halt the certification and overthrow the government on 1/6.
Kellogg also corroborated an account of the phone call where Trump claimed that if Pence did not do what he was asking, he had selected the wrong running mate.
"Mike, it's not right. You can do this. I'm counting on you to do it. If you don't do it, I picked the wrong man four years ago. You're going to wimp out," the transcript of the interview read that Kellogg confirmed.“ (It’s in that tweet above but I copied and pasted the quote from here: https://www.wktv.com/news/national/january-6-committee-asks-ivanka-trump-to-talk-with-them/article_770266b8-592a-5c08-a275-fd8c0517b67e.html)
I mean that was bad, but using the threat of a federal criminal investigation to shake down election officials is worse. Still can’t believe we couldn’t get enough senators to convict the SOB.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the call to Georgia officials is still the most damning evidence of POTUS criminal liability for the seditious conspiracy. I’m sure there’s more of that kind of evidence that we haven’t seen yet. The rabble rousing on the hill was just the tip of the iceberg so to speak.
Nah. The phone call from Trump to Pence is even clearer and proves that he was trying to halt the certification and overthrow the government on 1/6.
Kellogg also corroborated an account of the phone call where Trump claimed that if Pence did not do what he was asking, he had selected the wrong running mate.
"Mike, it's not right. You can do this. I'm counting on you to do it. If you don't do it, I picked the wrong man four years ago. You're going to wimp out," the transcript of the interview read that Kellogg confirmed.“ (It’s in that tweet above but I copied and pasted the quote from here: https://www.wktv.com/news/national/january-6-committee-asks-ivanka-trump-to-talk-with-them/article_770266b8-592a-5c08-a275-fd8c0517b67e.html)
Anonymous wrote:I think the call to Georgia officials is still the most damning evidence of POTUS criminal liability for the seditious conspiracy. I’m sure there’s more of that kind of evidence that we haven’t seen yet. The rabble rousing on the hill was just the tip of the iceberg so to speak.
BlueFredneck wrote:Any Republican questioning the severity of this needs to wonder how they'd be feeling if it were hundreds of Antifa/BLM extremists storming the Capital Steps, with a mix of tourists, clowns, and well-armed people (and you cannot deny any longer there were some 100-200 people with some sort of longer-term plan who had some sort of training and C&C structure, as opposed to tourists just getting a bit overly exuberant.)
Any Democrat crowing about 1/6 needs to ask themselves how the George Floyd riots helped things - or how the 1967/8 riots helped liberal causes in the long run. Parts of DC stayed pretty much in statis for 40 years.
I view the J6 riots as more damaging long-term to America's strength as a federal republic of any sort. These wounds are harder to heal than the wounds of smashed storefront windows. For this reason alone I cannot ever vote Republican - but I was largely a lost cause to them.
But not everyone thinks of this in the same manner.
BlueFredneck wrote:Any Republican questioning the severity of this needs to wonder how they'd be feeling if it were hundreds of Antifa/BLM extremists storming the Capital Steps, with a mix of tourists, clowns, and well-armed people (and you cannot deny any longer there were some 100-200 people with some sort of longer-term plan who had some sort of training and C&C structure, as opposed to tourists just getting a bit overly exuberant.)
Any Democrat crowing about 1/6 needs to ask themselves how the George Floyd riots helped things - or how the 1967/8 riots helped liberal causes in the long run. Parts of DC stayed pretty much in statis for 40 years.
I view the J6 riots as more damaging long-term to America's strength as a federal republic of any sort. These wounds are harder to heal than the wounds of smashed storefront windows. For this reason alone I cannot ever vote Republican - but I was largely a lost cause to them.
But not everyone thinks of this in the same manner.
Anonymous wrote:Kinda punches holes in the GOP’s theory that Donald just had a peaceful rally.