Anonymous wrote:Creating More cafs means less market rate housing, which means rent goes up and the middle class moves out.
The middle class used to be able to live in north Arlington. My boomer colleagues are puzzled that I wouldn’t just move and send my kid to ashlawn or long branch. That’s what they did in the 80’s.
Of course they will be selling their shitty little homes for a million dollars. Would that I could afford them, and the deferred maintainance they will inevitably demand.
Anonymous wrote:Best kept secret 16 X bus up Columbia Pike into DC. The County needs more commercial tenants. The school board is in a tough spot but Arlington is at the precipice of a tipping point. School Board is under pressure. Corporations, including Amazon, are watching. UMC and MV in S Arlington are speaking up. Pressure is on...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree PP, but the point is that if enough wealth and retail comes to the area, the owners of the local "slums" like Barcroft Apartments will perhaps see an incentive to sell out. Maybe their taxes will get too high. Or they realize that poorer folks don't want to live in an area where things are too expensive for them an they have too many vacancies. Isn't that what gentrification is all about - and supporters of keeping the Pike poor care about - catering to the lower income residents? Gentrification is what raised rents and values in North Arlington that led to so few MARKS in North Arlington. If landlords can get more money for newer nicer places, they will.
Maybe the County cares about people who are not as overprivileged as many others in Arlington are. Maybe they, too, deserve a place to live. Maybe affordable housing plays a role in that.
Please. It’s about money. That’s all
Anonymous wrote:It just seems like rich white people won’t be content until they have claimed every inch of land in Arlington.
Anonymous wrote:Best kept secret 16 X bus up Columbia Pike into DC. The County needs more commercial tenants. The school board is in a tough spot but Arlington is at the precipice of a tipping point. School Board is under pressure. Corporations, including Amazon, are watching. UMC and MV in S Arlington are speaking up. Pressure is on...
Anonymous wrote:It just seems like rich white people won’t be content until they have claimed every inch of land in Arlington.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree PP, but the point is that if enough wealth and retail comes to the area, the owners of the local "slums" like Barcroft Apartments will perhaps see an incentive to sell out. Maybe their taxes will get too high. Or they realize that poorer folks don't want to live in an area where things are too expensive for them an they have too many vacancies. Isn't that what gentrification is all about - and supporters of keeping the Pike poor care about - catering to the lower income residents? Gentrification is what raised rents and values in North Arlington that led to so few MARKS in North Arlington. If landlords can get more money for newer nicer places, they will.
The metro gentrified north arlington.
You don’t understand. Delashmutt owns Barcroft, and aside from making the family a fortune as it is today, they’ve sold/transferred their development rights. Add to that the county putting every barrier possible in place for something like townhomes to be built on the site of current garden apartments? It doesn’t make sense to do anything else, aside from continuing as it is now.
I suppose they could renovate and turn them into condos ( like west village).
But understand the county has worked tirelessly to lock in that housing.
Losing Barcroft Apartments is not acceptable to AH policy in Arlington.
You aren’t understanding that county is actively preventing the market from gentrification.
Anonymous wrote:That area was Vietnamese at the time I think. It became Latino immigrants became mostly Latino.
There are also more working/lower class whites living in south Arlington.
They have been mostly gentrified out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pausing to note upside of this thread: It's constructive! No one is salivating at the idea of another school's demise like the MONAs are on the other one. Damn.
Just name calling, threats, fighting about house values, which school should get which neighborhood... let’s not pat ourselves on our backs too hard.
There are some fundamental misunderstandings as to why the schools perform as they do, how they are made up, and what we can do about it.
Also, it seems north Arlington has already decided what is important for APS. We don’t really get a say now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pausing to note upside of this thread: It's constructive! No one is salivating at the idea of another school's demise like the MONAs are on the other one. Damn.
Just name calling, threats, fighting about house values, which school should get which neighborhood... let’s not pat ourselves on our backs too hard.