Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To those making sexist misogynistic jokes about Kamala, good job! That’ll make sure women will come out in droves to make sure she’s elected!

Just like women turned out in droves to make sure Hillary was elected

The gender of the candidate is immaterial to a lot of people. It’s the policies that matter. I am a woman supporting Trump, because his policies are a lot better for this country.

Pretty funny that Hillary got DEI’d by Harris.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To those making sexist misogynistic jokes about Kamala, good job! That’ll make sure women will come out in droves to make sure she’s elected!

Just like women turned out in droves to make sure Hillary was elected

The gender of the candidate is immaterial to a lot of people. It’s the policies that matter. I am a woman supporting Trump, because his policies are a lot better for this country.

Exactly. Trump loves America. Democrats hate America. It’s that simple.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To those making sexist misogynistic jokes about Kamala, good job! That’ll make sure women will come out in droves to make sure she’s elected!

Just like women turned out in droves to make sure Hillary was elected

The gender of the candidate is immaterial to a lot of people. It’s the policies that matter. I am a woman supporting Trump, because his policies are a lot better for this country.

We know because you won't shut up about it

Anonymous wrote:To those making sexist misogynistic jokes about Kamala, good job! That’ll make sure women will come out in droves to make sure she’s elected!

Just like women turned out in droves to make sure Hillary was elected

The gender of the candidate is immaterial to a lot of people. It’s the policies that matter. I am a woman supporting Trump, because his policies are a lot better for this country.

To those making sexist misogynistic jokes about Kamala, good job! That’ll make sure women will come out in droves to make sure she’s elected!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:does this seem like a lack of momentum?

When theyre paid time and a half plus bused in... yeah!

Interesting. I keep seeing accusations that people who go to Harris/Walz rallies or boo at MAGA rallies are being “bused in” and it can only mean one thing: Trump is busing people to his rallies and I guess paying them “time and a half.”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Comrade Kamala's newest attempt to ignore the 4th estate

Oh perhaps she was, I don’t know, taking an important call as the sitting VP of the US? Try again.

And where’s old man Donald this weekend? Taking some more executive time?

Anonymous wrote:Comrade Kamala's newest attempt to ignore the 4th estate

Oh perhaps she was, I don’t know, taking an important call as the sitting VP of the US? Try again.

Comrade Kamala's newest attempt to ignore the 4th estate

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:does this seem like a lack of momentum?

When theyre paid time and a half plus bused in... yeah!

haha oh yeah, that must be it.

Anonymous wrote:does this seem like a lack of momentum?

When theyre paid time and a half plus bused in... yeah!

Anonymous wrote:10:35 again and I find this new campaign strategy very demeaning to women - that there are all these woman who want to vote for her but need encouragement because they life with R husbands? WTH. This is not a winning strategy and does not make me like her.

It's not campaign strategy. It's some Harris supporter coming up with an idea to communicate with women that their votes are private, and their spouses don't really know how they're voting.

There was a divorce lawyer who gives free advice to women posting on Twitter that she was receiving a large volume of the same non-divorce related question - 'Can my husband find out how I am voting?'. So there are apparently a lot of women that do have that question. And have relationships where they are not at liberty to say that they're voting differently from their spouses.

Anonymous wrote:10:35 again and I find this new campaign strategy very demeaning to women - that there are all these woman who want to vote for her but need encouragement because they life with R husbands? WTH. This is not a winning strategy and does not make me like her.

This country is full of churches telling women to submit to their husbands.
I think it’s just great you haven’t been affected by that, but it’s a very real problem.

does this seem like a lack of momentum?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Especially for those of you who live in red areas, this is a very good idea.

Isn’t this littering? Leaving these everywhere? I’m generally perplexed as a women married to someone way more conservative politically than me, do you honestly think my husband has that much influence over me and that paper has more? I don’t share many views as my husband and that’s okay. We’ve managed to be together almost 30 years at this point.

I’m thinking it’s meant to be used as TP if they run out!