Anonymous wrote:Younger generations have been more pro-life than their parents. The politics of this may not play out as intended.

On the other hand, this will lead to the birth of more babies that will grow up to vote for Democrats.

If younger generations have been more anti-abortion, it's because they don't have memories of the desperation of relatives and friends with unwanted pregnancies, or of those who died or nearly died or lost their uterus because of botched back-alley abortions, or don't know of people whose lives were derailed because of being forced to bring a pregnancy to term. Now let's see what happens when they learn of the consequences of denying women safe abortions.

This is the world that conservatives fantasize about. Women's lives being destroyed.

Younger generations have been more pro-life than their parents. The politics of this may not play out as intended.

On the other hand, this will lead to the birth of more babies that will grow up to vote for Democrats.

It seems that many posters are fine with Supreme Court decisions, as long as they agree with what's decided.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Finally, after the suctioning of 63 million growing babies

STFU you total POS!!

those were fetuses, not "babies"

grow a brain and learn the difference

I've been pregnant 3 times. Not once did any of my doctors (male or female) refer to my pregnancy with the word fetus.

Mine did.

But sounds like your pregnancies were wanted. Sounds like you were willing to gestate them to term, to go through labor and delivery, to have your body changed, to accept the danger of pregnancy and birthing, and to take on the responsibility of raising children. Not all women accept those things, and no government should be able to force them to.

Those doctors did nit know what I was thinking or planning to do when they first saw me.

Noticed that you didn't address the question of other women not accepting the choice you made to undergo a potentially life-threatening process.

No, because that's not what I was addressing. I'll say it again, no doctor, female or male, ever referred to my "fetus."

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Finally, after the suctioning of 63 million growing babies

STFU you total POS!!

those were fetuses, not "babies"

grow a brain and learn the difference

I've been pregnant 3 times. Not once did any of my doctors (male or female) refer to my pregnancy with the word fetus.

Mine did.

But sounds like your pregnancies were wanted. Sounds like you were willing to gestate them to term, to go through labor and delivery, to have your body changed, to accept the danger of pregnancy and birthing, and to take on the responsibility of raising children. Not all women accept those things, and no government should be able to force them to.

Those doctors did nit know what I was thinking or planning to do when they first saw me.

Noticed that you didn't address the question of other women not accepting the choice you made to undergo a potentially life-threatening process.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Corporations need to speak up and leave states that have banned abortions. Offering to pay for women to travel out of state doesn’t cut it. No reason for women’s privacy to be violated to uphold an extreme religious doctrine.

Agree. This is a major human rights issue. Out of these states. I’m ready to boycott the companies that don’t leave.

Yep, and finally the tiny humans are being represented. You live in a bubble. Even if most support early abortion, the number of people who are sooo pro-abort that they will boycott companies that don't leave states where abortion is legal is tiny.

As if you give a sh!t about humans. Women are humans and you clearly don't care about them.

Who is representing the millions of hungry and homeless children, those without families and those without health insurance? Not any of you cons. You fetishize embryos and shrug when 10 year olds get pulverized by guns you salivate over. Hypocrite.

Gotta have more parentless 10 year olds to feed the GOP lust for pedophilia. They have a serious problem.

We have reached a milestone for sure, the Taliban have a more progressive policy on abortion than the greatest country in the world.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Finally, after the suctioning of 63 million growing babies

STFU you total POS!!

those were fetuses, not "babies"

grow a brain and learn the difference

I've been pregnant 3 times. Not once did any of my doctors (male or female) refer to my pregnancy with the word fetus.

Mine did.

But sounds like your pregnancies were wanted. Sounds like you were willing to gestate them to term, to go through labor and delivery, to have your body changed, to accept the danger of pregnancy and birthing, and to take on the responsibility of raising children. Not all women accept those things, and no government should be able to force them to.

Why should your standard be the right one?

Why should yours be imposed on others? I'd have an abortion in certain situations. I wouldn't impose my opinion about that on others in the same situation - it's up to individual women to decide for themselves.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

That's not funny even provocative. Rapists don't want to father children.

But apparently they have rights to the children conceived through their crime. Or don't you pay attention to current events?

https://news.yahoo.com/man-raped-12-old-awarded-114904992.html

https://cafemom.com/news/accused-rapist-gets-custody-of-his-victims-daughter-mom-pays-child-support

https://www.motherjones.com/crime-justice/2019/08/rapist-custody-abortion/

Anonymous wrote:

Kavanaugh and Thomas both need to make sure that those who follow in their rapey footsteps are as protected as possible.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Finally, after the suctioning of 63 million growing babies

STFU you total POS!!

those were fetuses, not "babies"

grow a brain and learn the difference

I've been pregnant 3 times. Not once did any of my doctors (male or female) refer to my pregnancy with the word fetus.

Mine did.

But sounds like your pregnancies were wanted. Sounds like you were willing to gestate them to term, to go through labor and delivery, to have your body changed, to accept the danger of pregnancy and birthing, and to take on the responsibility of raising children. Not all women accept those things, and no government should be able to force them to.

Those doctors did nit know what I was thinking or planning to do when they first saw me.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Finally, after the suctioning of 63 million growing babies

STFU you total POS!!

those were fetuses, not "babies"

grow a brain and learn the difference

I've been pregnant 3 times. Not once did any of my doctors (male or female) refer to my pregnancy with the word fetus.

Mine did.

But sounds like your pregnancies were wanted. Sounds like you were willing to gestate them to term, to go through labor and delivery, to have your body changed, to accept the danger of pregnancy and birthing, and to take on the responsibility of raising children. Not all women accept those things, and no government should be able to force them to.

Why should your standard be the right one?

Anonymous wrote:Thanks a lot to all the indy wine drinking suburban moms who voted for this POS corporate raider: "Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin said he will seek legislation on abortion"

https://www.wtvr.com/news/virginia-politics/virginia-governor-glenn-youngkin-to-seek-abortion-legislation

The first clue should have been that his LT Governor is bat shit crazy and can't get through an interview about choice without becoming tearful.

We told "moms." But no, they decided he was a moderate. Welp.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Corporations need to speak up and leave states that have banned abortions. Offering to pay for women to travel out of state doesn’t cut it. No reason for women’s privacy to be violated to uphold an extreme religious doctrine.

Agree. This is a major human rights issue. Out of these states. I’m ready to boycott the companies that don’t leave.

Yep, and finally the tiny humans are being represented. You live in a bubble. Even if most support early abortion, the number of people who are sooo pro-abort that they will boycott companies that don't leave states where abortion is legal is tiny.

As if you give a sh!t about humans. Women are humans and you clearly don't care about them.

Who is representing the millions of hungry and homeless children, those without families and those without health insurance? Not any of you cons. You fetishize embryos and shrug when 10 year olds get pulverized by guns you salivate over. Hypocrite.