Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think Sonya Larson is not only a bad art friend, but a bad artist. I write in the literary genre, and I've been in the position of helping to select works for honors equivalent to BASS. Larson's story demonstrates she is not curious enough to be a good artist; she assigns a facile motive to her kidney donor. Larson's story demonstrates she is not precise enough to be a good artist; every detail of the donation was transparently unresearched. Larson's story demonstrates she does not have the empathy to be a good artist; the characters of the two women are only superficially explored. Larson's story demonstrates she does not have the creativity to be a good artist; the story is structured in a derivative manner, and there is not one iota of profundity, beauty, or mystery in the prose.
Why does she write? I've never understood "literary" writers who have so little feeling for language.
I had to reply just to thank you for this insight. I felt like I was missing everything, having first read all of these crazy pants defenses of The Story by, amongst others, Jennifer De Leon to the director of the Boston Book Festival. It’s a thin, poorly written story at absolute best.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sorry to spam! Don't know how to embed tweets
https://mobile.twitter.com/philosipede/status/1448224322242236418
Wrong link smh
https://mobile.twitter.com/PMatzko/status/1448075901028143110
I appreciate your effort to get it right because that thread really spoke to me. He nails it. A quick summary because I think these points are so key:
1) Dawn is annoying to Sonya and others because she doesn't understand the social code of UMC writing circles. She doesn't know how to "humble brag" about her kidney donation in that way where you make sure everyone knows what you did but in a way that makes it seem like you don't want anyone to know (even though you obviously do). She is earnest and honest instead of calculating about the way she presents herself, and that comes off as grating. She can't code switch because the code is foreign to her and they don't teach this stuff at public schools in rural Iowa. You have to learn it from parents and peers. But the time Dawn is in this environment, her personality is what it is and it's too late for her to learn how to fit in with the cool kids.
and
2) When you are poor, your "good name" is sometimes the only currency you have. Which helps explain why Dawn's response to being humiliated in this way seems so overzealous. To Dawn, having the one thing she's ever done that she felt was uncomplicatedly good (the purest evidence of her worth as a person) ridiculed by people she admired was like having all her money stolen from the accounts, or being physically maimed. It tore right at her fundamental sense of self. You can argue she overreacted but if you don't understand the importance of reputation and social standing to someone from a poor background, that's a value judgement that ignores Dawn's values.
Anonymous wrote:I can't help but think what fact(s) would have to be different for Ng to call out the actual plagiarism?
I'm horrified, but also deeply curious at the human behavior at play here.
Anonymous wrote:Christopher Castellani is another horrible person.
Only he is not just an author but was the artistic director of GrubStreet.
Read the email he sent about how brilliant Celeste Ng is to have come up with DFD, and how it's not too late for Dawn to get a job at the post office or American Midway.
https://mobile.twitter.com/Joshua_Luna/status/1447370848072044546/photo/4
![]()
And in other email:
"My mission in life is going to be to exact revenge on this pestilence of a person"
![]()
Anonymous wrote:I think Sonya Larson is not only a bad art friend, but a bad artist. I write in the literary genre, and I've been in the position of helping to select works for honors equivalent to BASS. Larson's story demonstrates she is not curious enough to be a good artist; she assigns a facile motive to her kidney donor. Larson's story demonstrates she is not precise enough to be a good artist; every detail of the donation was transparently unresearched. Larson's story demonstrates she does not have the empathy to be a good artist; the characters of the two women are only superficially explored. Larson's story demonstrates she does not have the creativity to be a good artist; the story is structured in a derivative manner, and there is not one iota of profundity, beauty, or mystery in the prose.
Why does she write? I've never understood "literary" writers who have so little feeling for language.
Anonymous wrote:The fact that they had reduced her to "DFD" speaks to how childish and invested in their cruelty they all were as grown ass adults!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sorry to spam! Don't know how to embed tweets
https://mobile.twitter.com/philosipede/status/1448224322242236418
Wrong link smh
https://mobile.twitter.com/PMatzko/status/1448075901028143110
I appreciate your effort to get it right because that thread really spoke to me. He nails it. A quick summary because I think these points are so key:
1) Dawn is annoying to Sonya and others because she doesn't understand the social code of UMC writing circles. She doesn't know how to "humble brag" about her kidney donation in that way where you make sure everyone knows what you did but in a way that makes it seem like you don't want anyone to know (even though you obviously do). She is earnest and honest instead of calculating about the way she presents herself, and that comes off as grating. She can't code switch because the code is foreign to her and they don't teach this stuff at public schools in rural Iowa. You have to learn it from parents and peers. But the time Dawn is in this environment, her personality is what it is and it's too late for her to learn how to fit in with the cool kids.
and
2) When you are poor, your "good name" is sometimes the only currency you have. Which helps explain why Dawn's response to being humiliated in this way seems so overzealous. To Dawn, having the one thing she's ever done that she felt was uncomplicatedly good (the purest evidence of her worth as a person) ridiculed by people she admired was like having all her money stolen from the accounts, or being physically maimed. It tore right at her fundamental sense of self. You can argue she overreacted but if you don't understand the importance of reputation and social standing to someone from a poor background, that's a value judgement that ignores Dawn's values.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sorry to spam! Don't know how to embed tweets
https://mobile.twitter.com/philosipede/status/1448224322242236418
Wrong link smh
https://mobile.twitter.com/PMatzko/status/1448075901028143110
Anonymous wrote:We need to reach out to GrubStreet en masse and tell them this is not OK that they still have Sonya Larson, Allison Murphy, and Christopher Castellani still on their staff.
They need to be suspended until a thorough investigation is done.
https://grubstreet.org/contact-us/
Anonymous wrote:I don’t give a f*ck if you want to humblebrag a little bit on FB — a platform in which literally everybody who uses it humblebrags — about giving up your kidney. THIS WOMAN SAVED A LIFE and people are more concerned that she’s cringe.
I am not exaggerating, this is incredibly damaging for anyone and everyone who has or will ever need a kidney. There are 100,000 people in this country waiting for a kidney donation — but no, making fun of the awkward cringe person is more important. These people have blood on their hands. I hope the National Kidney Foundation issues a statement.
Anonymous wrote:Sorry to spam! Don't know how to embed tweets
https://mobile.twitter.com/philosipede/status/1448224322242236418