Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It is clear, from the posters here and from the statements from the Democrats, that they really have no reasonable argument against a wall. It is all about #resistance and ensuring that Trump is unable to fulfill a promise he made to the American people...
Dems: "Walls don't work."
<They are shown evidence of how successful the wall has been not only in our country, but also other countries>
Dems: "We need other solutions - technology and people."
<They are shown evidence of where Trump has stated he would include other solutions>
Dems: "You can't place a wall along the entire border."
<They are shown evidence of where Trump has stated that there will be places where a wall won't be built>
Dems: "It's too much money."
<"It is less than 1/2 of 1% of the federal budget">
Dems: "You haven't spent all the money already allocated."
<"Neither have many of the agencies allocated money. If that is your criteria for spending, we can talk about some of the social programs you want to fund.>
Dems: "Why have you chosen this hill to die on?"
Nice try, folks. Your strategy is so damned transparent.
Walls don't work. Ask Reagan. Look at the stats. And if you campaign on building a wall that Mexico is going to pay for, then follow through on that promise. I don't think, if Trump had run on a platform of "We are going to spend $30B on a Wall" that conservatives would have supported that.
And ultimately, Trump had control of the House, Senate and White House for the past 2 years and didn't do diddly squat on his wall. In another week, he will have lost his chance. Why didn't the GOP support him when he had the chance? Why didn't he take the $25B when the democrats offered it?
60 votes in the Senate.
Unless it’s done through reconciliation. Then it needs 50 votes. Rs used their first reconciliation to fail to repeal Obamacare and their second on the #TaxScam. Obamacare repeal did not get 50 votes. The TaxScam passed with no Dem votes.
So, there are two ways Trump could have gotten immigration reform without a single D vote:
1. If immigration reform was really that important, Rs could have passed it through one of their two reconciliation shots, instead of the Obamacare failure or tax cuts. Why didn’t they?
2. McConnell could have gone nuclear. Why didn’t he?
Answer: because quite a few Rs are not on board with Trumps immigration policy. So, there aren’t even 50 R votes in the senate for what Trump wants.
And now Trump has lost the ability to use reconciliation or go nuclear, because the Dem House will veto.
Too bad. So sad. But be clear. We are here because Rs believed Obamacare repeal (failed) and Taxes were more important. It could have been done without Dem votes.