Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I cannot find a contractual definition for when a passenger's "boarding" is complete. Please post if you see this definition.
I'm on my phone. But essentially a "boarded" passenger is an "enplaned" passenger. This is used to calculate revenue miles and fees (airport, FAA and IATA among others). You don't count passengers as boarded or enplaned until such time as they cannot get off. That happens when the door closes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:United stock almost back to where it opened this morning:
https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/UAL?p=UAL
Place your bets on whether passenger revenue will actually decline due to this incident. My bet is people will have forgotten about this in a week's time. Well know next month when they release passenger numbers.
I think their next earnings report will be down. I know the American public has the attention span of a flea, but this issue is bigger than they realize and won't go away quickly. I'm a former frequent flyer who had status on United, and this episode has gotten under my skin in a way nothing else has in recent memory. I have 200k miles I had planned to see about using on a trip with my family, but now I'm just going to cash them out, cancel my United credit card, and close that chapter of my life. They'll probably survive, but they'll have some rough times ahead. Munoz will be fired, mark my words.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This should have been the statement yesterday, not today. Love the self serving line "it's never too late to do the right thing". Please.
Please. We need to reaccomodate him.
I believe his first statement more.
Yes, he's hoping the people would reaccomodate his new statement.
Reaccomodate himmout of his job and office.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
It wasn't an Involuntary Denied Boarding. He had ALREADY boarded. It was an involuntary de-boarding.
You are incorrect. A passenger is not officially boarded until the aircraft door is shut. Please stop spreading misinformation.
Please go f yourself.
Why? Don't like reality? I'm honestly confused at the hate here. Please go research these things.
Anonymous wrote:I wonder how much info the CEO had to write this letter to his employees initially:
This situation was unfortunately compounded when one of the passengers we politely asked to deplane refused, and it became necessary to contact Chicago Aviation Security Officers to help," the letter says. "While I deeply regret this situation arose, I also emphatically stand behind all of you, and I want to commend you for continuing to go above and beyond to ensure we fly right."
After blaming the victim, he is now apologizing again trying to do damage control. I am guessing his executives or the ones who briefed him and suggested the language in the first letter are in de*p shit.
Anonymous wrote:United stock almost back to where it opened this morning:
https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/UAL?p=UAL
Place your bets on whether passenger revenue will actually decline due to this incident. My bet is people will have forgotten about this in a week's time. Well know next month when they release passenger numbers.
Anonymous wrote:United stock almost back to where it opened this morning:
https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/UAL?p=UAL
Place your bets on whether passenger revenue will actually decline due to this incident. My bet is people will have forgotten about this in a week's time. Well know next month when they release passenger numbers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This should have been the statement yesterday, not today. Love the self serving line "it's never too late to do the right thing". Please.
Please. We need to reaccomodate him.
I believe his first statement more.
Yes, he's hoping the people would reaccomodate his new statement.
Reaccomodate himmout of his job and office.
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/uniteds-real-mistake-173844672.html?.tsrc=fauxdal
I wonder when the media would actually clarify if this flight is actually considered "overbooked".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This should have been the statement yesterday, not today. Love the self serving line "it's never too late to do the right thing". Please.
Please. We need to reaccomodate him.
I believe his first statement more.
Yes, he's hoping the people would reaccomodate his new statement.
Reaccomodate himmout of his job and office.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This should have been the statement yesterday, not today. Love the self serving line "it's never too late to do the right thing". Please.
Please. We need to reaccomodate him.
I believe his first statement more.
Yes, he's hoping the people would reaccomodate his new statement.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This should have been the statement yesterday, not today. Love the self serving line "it's never too late to do the right thing". Please.
Please. We need to reaccomodate him.
I believe his first statement more.
Yes, he's hoping the people would reaccomodate his new statement.