Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Voted no. Blue-anon is worst then maga. Just look at the purposed map. Yeah, Keep my state purple. Not interested in being in the crazy asylum with either the left or right crazies.
Most of my democrat neighbors voted NO this morning. None of us want Virginia to turn into California, Illinois, Maryland or NY.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Voted no. Blue-anon is worst then maga. Just look at the purposed map. Yeah, Keep my state purple. Not interested in being in the crazy asylum with either the left or right crazies.
Most of my democrat neighbors voted NO this morning. None of us want Virginia to turn into California, Illinois, Maryland or NY.
Anonymous wrote:Voted no. Blue-anon is worst then maga. Just look at the purposed map. Yeah, Keep my state purple. Not interested in being in the crazy asylum with either the left or right crazies.
Anonymous wrote:17 year old should NOT be allowed to vote. MY LIBERAL daughter votes YES....
I am pissed off the reason she liberal is because of TIKTOK and the school system.
Anonymous wrote:Voted NO. Hopefully, the No votes win and we can take a rolled-up newspaper to Spanberger’s behind, rub her nose in her piss legislation to send a message: “No, no, NO: BAD governor, BAD governor.”
Anonymous wrote:Voted no. Blue-anon is worst then maga. Just look at the purposed map. Yeah, Keep my state purple. Not interested in being in the crazy asylum with either the left or right crazies.
Anonymous wrote:Voting No in a couple hours. Trump enters lame duck status in six months. There is zero need for this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The wording was very sketchy it said do you want to enable fairness in elections , that doesn't seem truthful it should have said allowing temporary redistricting powers , definitely another thing that will end up in the supreme court, why did Dems mess this up by adding that wording about fairness wtf
Fairness is accurate. But you have to look longer than the end of your own face.
Anonymous wrote:The wording was very sketchy it said do you want to enable fairness in elections , that doesn't seem truthful it should have said allowing temporary redistricting powers , definitely another thing that will end up in the supreme court, why did Dems mess this up by adding that wording about fairness wtf
Anonymous wrote:The wording was very sketchy it said do you want to enable fairness in elections , that doesn't seem truthful it should have said allowing temporary redistricting powers , definitely another thing that will end up in the supreme court, why did Dems mess this up by adding that wording about fairness wtf