Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
This guy is accused of voting in five presidential elections. When he’s convicted, you have one example.
Now, please tell me what you’re going to do to address the Georgia case of proven fraud?
It literally says he's been charged.
Yes. Charges are accusations. When he is *convicted* you will have an example of proven fraud.
The question was what would be done to address the fraud. The individual has been charged. This happens at such a miniscule rate that handling it at the individual level is really all that is appropriate.
How do you know? This guy went for 20 years undetected. How many other illegals are voting that we don’t know about????
Not many - this is really not the issue the right makes it out to be. There are more actual republicans who are voting illegally as per actual convictions.
If the GOP truly wanted to address this issue, they would fully fund the ability for eligible people to obtain cards for free. But since that isn't on the table, it won't happen.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
This guy is accused of voting in five presidential elections. When he’s convicted, you have one example.
Now, please tell me what you’re going to do to address the Georgia case of proven fraud?
It literally says he's been charged.
Yes. Charges are accusations. When he is *convicted* you will have an example of proven fraud.
The question was what would be done to address the fraud. The individual has been charged. This happens at such a miniscule rate that handling it at the individual level is really all that is appropriate.
How do you know? This guy went for 20 years undetected. How many other illegals are voting that we don’t know about????
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
This guy is accused of voting in five presidential elections. When he’s convicted, you have one example.
Now, please tell me what you’re going to do to address the Georgia case of proven fraud?
It literally says he's been charged.
Yes. Charges are accusations. When he is *convicted* you will have an example of proven fraud.
The question was what would be done to address the fraud. The individual has been charged. This happens at such a miniscule rate that handling it at the individual level is really all that is appropriate.
How do you know? This guy went for 20 years undetected. How many other illegals are voting that we don’t know about????
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
This guy is accused of voting in five presidential elections. When he’s convicted, you have one example.
Now, please tell me what you’re going to do to address the Georgia case of proven fraud?
It literally says he's been charged.
Yes. Charges are accusations. When he is *convicted* you will have an example of proven fraud.
The question was what would be done to address the fraud. The individual has been charged. This happens at such a miniscule rate that handling it at the individual level is really all that is appropriate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
This guy is accused of voting in five presidential elections. When he’s convicted, you have one example.
Now, please tell me what you’re going to do to address the Georgia case of proven fraud?
It literally says he's been charged.
Yes. Charges are accusations. When he is *convicted* you will have an example of proven fraud.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
This guy is accused of voting in five presidential elections. When he’s convicted, you have one example.
Now, please tell me what you’re going to do to address the Georgia case of proven fraud?
It literally says he's been charged.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
This guy is accused of voting in five presidential elections. When he’s convicted, you have one example.
Now, please tell me what you’re going to do to address the Georgia case of proven fraud?
It literally says he's been charged.