Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I found this. Starts at 1:35. I think there may have been one more.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBWXLCKL61s&t=1564s
There was one more NAACP candidate forum with just the Education Committee. That's where I think DP felt there was some racist sentiment coming from Miranda.
I just listened to this link. Thank you. Just FYI Miranda was against SROs in schools in 2001.
She seems very progressive on this link. Talking about access to housing before MM was even a hot topic. I'm so confused.
She had to be. She was seeking the NAACP endorsement. She messed up the first time with the Ed Committee. I hope someone can find that link, but it was a reverse face. She wasn’t so progressive elsewhere. Truth be told, the naacp isn’t going to endorse anyone who is pro SRO.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I found this. Starts at 1:35. I think there may have been one more.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBWXLCKL61s&t=1564s
There was one more NAACP candidate forum with just the Education Committee. That's where I think DP felt there was some racist sentiment coming from Miranda.
I just listened to this link. Thank you. Just FYI Miranda was against SROs in schools in 2001.
She seems very progressive on this link. Talking about access to housing before MM was even a hot topic. I'm so confused.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I found this. Starts at 1:35. I think there may have been one more.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBWXLCKL61s&t=1564s
There was one more NAACP candidate forum with just the Education Committee. That's where I think DP felt there was some racist sentiment coming from Miranda.
I just listened to this link. Thank you. Just FYI Miranda was against SROs in schools in 2001.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I found this. Starts at 1:35. I think there may have been one more.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBWXLCKL61s&t=1564s
There was one more NAACP candidate forum with just the Education Committee. That's where I think DP felt there was some racist sentiment coming from Miranda.
I just listened to this link. Thank you. Just FYI Miranda was against SROs in schools in 2001.
Anonymous wrote:I found this. Starts at 1:35. I think there may have been one more.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBWXLCKL61s&t=1564s
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just caught up in this thread. Whew. I guess with APE present we're going to have another nasty race.
Too lazy to backtrack to quote previous postings but I agree that endorsements may not be handed out so freely this election. Both candidates are problematic for different reasons. I don't think Miranda had any real endorsements the last time she ran. I expect more of the same. There's very few Dems that want to be associated with perceived dark money and vouchers for schools coming from the right. Like it or not, APE is lumped together with all of those groups because they represent them in their "big tent."
No that's not possible. Because there is no actual race that is happening.
School board elections are nonpartisan and candidates are expected to run based on political part. It's just that Arlington turned it into a partisan effort. And the Democrat candidate always wins.
For those that feel strongly that the candidates presented aren't good enough, then they need to encourage someone they do want to run.
If an independent wants to run, all they need to do is say they don't support the Missing Middle initiative because of impacts on schools, environment, blah, blah, whatever else the people in N Arl go on about. That person could be assured of a win. It doesn't matter that the SB doesn't get a vote on Missing Middle it's the idea that someone elected who says they don't support it has been elected an they will hold out hope they will weigh in to the county board and the county board will listen.
MM doesn't have anything to do with this race, but yes, you did try to distract again. Independents historically don't win in Arlington because this is a Blue town. Whoever wins the caucus will most definitely win the election. But maybe this time with two terrible candidates, someone who is a true progressive may prevail. Probably not, but hope springs eternal.
Like I said upthread, yes that was me, Miranda is going to have to prove to me that she is an actual Democrat before I will even consider voting for her.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just caught up in this thread. Whew. I guess with APE present we're going to have another nasty race.
Too lazy to backtrack to quote previous postings but I agree that endorsements may not be handed out so freely this election. Both candidates are problematic for different reasons. I don't think Miranda had any real endorsements the last time she ran. I expect more of the same. There's very few Dems that want to be associated with perceived dark money and vouchers for schools coming from the right. Like it or not, APE is lumped together with all of those groups because they represent them in their "big tent."
No that's not possible. Because there is no actual race that is happening.
School board elections are nonpartisan and candidates are expected to run based on political part. It's just that Arlington turned it into a partisan effort. And the Democrat candidate always wins.
For those that feel strongly that the candidates presented aren't good enough, then they need to encourage someone they do want to run.
If an independent wants to run, all they need to do is say they don't support the Missing Middle initiative because of impacts on schools, environment, blah, blah, whatever else the people in N Arl go on about. That person could be assured of a win. It doesn't matter that the SB doesn't get a vote on Missing Middle it's the idea that someone elected who says they don't support it has been elected an they will hold out hope they will weigh in to the county board and the county board will listen.
MM doesn't have anything to do with this race, but yes, you did try to distract again. Independents historically don't win in Arlington because this is a Blue town. Whoever wins the caucus will most definitely win the election. But maybe this time with two terrible candidates, someone who is a true progressive may prevail. Probably not, but hope springs eternal.
Like I said upthread, yes that was me, Miranda is going to have to prove to me that she is an actual Democrat before I will even consider voting for her.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Go to threads from 2020-21 when Miranda ran the first time. That will really tell you who she is. Maybe her and Mary K's debate at the NAACP candidate forums are still up? Boy. That was something. So tone deaf and frankly racist-lite.
I can't believe she's cleaned up her act 3 years later. It's bad. Two bad candidates.
Naw. It was full on racist. And I'll say it over and over again.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just caught up in this thread. Whew. I guess with APE present we're going to have another nasty race.
Too lazy to backtrack to quote previous postings but I agree that endorsements may not be handed out so freely this election. Both candidates are problematic for different reasons. I don't think Miranda had any real endorsements the last time she ran. I expect more of the same. There's very few Dems that want to be associated with perceived dark money and vouchers for schools coming from the right. Like it or not, APE is lumped together with all of those groups because they represent them in their "big tent."
No that's not possible. Because there is no actual race that is happening.
School board elections are nonpartisan and candidates are expected to run based on political part. It's just that Arlington turned it into a partisan effort. And the Democrat candidate always wins.
For those that feel strongly that the candidates presented aren't good enough, then they need to encourage someone they do want to run.
If an independent wants to run, all they need to do is say they don't support the Missing Middle initiative because of impacts on schools, environment, blah, blah, whatever else the people in N Arl go on about. That person could be assured of a win. It doesn't matter that the SB doesn't get a vote on Missing Middle it's the idea that someone elected who says they don't support it has been elected an they will hold out hope they will weigh in to the county board and the county board will listen.
Anonymous wrote:Go to threads from 2020-21 when Miranda ran the first time. That will really tell you who she is. Maybe her and Mary K's debate at the NAACP candidate forums are still up? Boy. That was something. So tone deaf and frankly racist-lite.
I can't believe she's cleaned up her act 3 years later. It's bad. Two bad candidates.
Anonymous wrote:I just caught up in this thread. Whew. I guess with APE present we're going to have another nasty race.
Too lazy to backtrack to quote previous postings but I agree that endorsements may not be handed out so freely this election. Both candidates are problematic for different reasons. I don't think Miranda had any real endorsements the last time she ran. I expect more of the same. There's very few Dems that want to be associated with perceived dark money and vouchers for schools coming from the right. Like it or not, APE is lumped together with all of those groups because they represent them in their "big tent."