Anonymous wrote:What makes me sad to think is that it seems (I use that term specifically because I haven't poured over all of the material) is that all accounts from Paul Pelosi are from the 911 tapes and not post-attack. I know he was in a very long surgery right after but does it seem like he's still out? Nothing in any police or FBI investigation has his take after the fact. I think he's worse off than we think.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What makes me sad to think is that it seems (I use that term specifically because I haven't poured over all of the material) is that all accounts from Paul Pelosi are from the 911 tapes and not post-attack. I know he was in a very long surgery right after but does it seem like he's still out? Nothing in any police or FBI investigation has his take after the fact. I think he's worse off than we think.

He is still in the ICU. It was reported somewhere that he does have memory of the incident.

Oh that's good to hear. Thank you!

PP. Geez, that came out wrong. Not good that he's still in the ICU, which I believed was the case. I just wondered if he was still unconscious, so I'm glad to hear that he has been awake and has memory.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What makes me sad to think is that it seems (I use that term specifically because I haven't poured over all of the material) is that all accounts from Paul Pelosi are from the 911 tapes and not post-attack. I know he was in a very long surgery right after but does it seem like he's still out? Nothing in any police or FBI investigation has his take after the fact. I think he's worse off than we think.

He is still in the ICU. It was reported somewhere that he does have memory of the incident.

Oh that's good to hear. Thank you!

Anonymous wrote:What makes me sad to think is that it seems (I use that term specifically because I haven't poured over all of the material) is that all accounts from Paul Pelosi are from the 911 tapes and not post-attack. I know he was in a very long surgery right after but does it seem like he's still out? Nothing in any police or FBI investigation has his take after the fact. I think he's worse off than we think.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What makes me sad to think is that it seems (I use that term specifically because I haven't poured over all of the material) is that all accounts from Paul Pelosi are from the 911 tapes and not post-attack. I know he was in a very long surgery right after but does it seem like he's still out? Nothing in any police or FBI investigation has his take after the fact. I think he's worse off than we think.

He is still in the ICU. It was reported somewhere that he does have memory of the incident.

Anonymous wrote:What makes me sad to think is that it seems (I use that term specifically because I haven't poured over all of the material) is that all accounts from Paul Pelosi are from the 911 tapes and not post-attack. I know he was in a very long surgery right after but does it seem like he's still out? Nothing in any police or FBI investigation has his take after the fact. I think he's worse off than we think.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I thought Pelosi went to take a bathroom break and called from there? Depape could hear him? Is this Depape's account? I'm honestly confused here.

Perhaps that speaks volumes about you. Pelosi was awoken in bed by the suspect who entered the residence by shattering a rear patio door. After some back and forth about “Nancy,” Pelosi was able to enter his bathroom, grab a telephone to dial 9-1-1 and speak with the dispatcher while the suspect listened and interjected. The FBI affidavit in support of the warrant is online and self-explanatory. Police responded within 8 minutes of the call and were confronted with Pelosi and the suspect each holding a hammer with one hand and the suspect restraining the arm of Pelosi with his second hand. Why have we become a nation in need of being spoonfed in Tweet sized bites?

https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1548106/download

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I said on another thread that the GOP is trying to get Democrats killed and someone said I was being over the top. I don’t think I’m being over the top; the GOP clearly thinks this is funny.

Well this is a quote from the Cheif of the Capitol Police that directly explains the threat we are facing as a country:

“In a statement Tuesday, Capitol Police Chief Tom Manger said that while there have been improvements — for instance, the department is on track to hire 280 additional officers this year — the country’s “political climate” is going to necessitate “additional layers of physical security.”

So if Trump and Republicans don’t intend to harm anyone then why do we need additional physical layers of security to protect Pelosi?

Re: the bolded. Ever stop to think that the political climate also refers to attitudes of Democrats?
You do realize that Republicans on the Hill face threats as well?

The only Republicans getting death threats are the Republicans deemed RINOs by MAGA. MAGA are really like terrorists.

Evidence proves this statement false. Sorry, pal.

What do you mean, sweetie-babe?

Here, honey babe.

C'mon. The guy left an angry voicemail. Not the same at all. Women politicians get multiples of these every day. Women of color have the highest rate of death threats and threats of sexual violence. Where's the outrage then? SMH.

Anonymous wrote:Back to say, if only the local and state and federal authorities were swift enough to take action like they did in this case. If only women were that lucky.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I said on another thread that the GOP is trying to get Democrats killed and someone said I was being over the top. I don’t think I’m being over the top; the GOP clearly thinks this is funny.

Well this is a quote from the Cheif of the Capitol Police that directly explains the threat we are facing as a country:

“In a statement Tuesday, Capitol Police Chief Tom Manger said that while there have been improvements — for instance, the department is on track to hire 280 additional officers this year — the country’s “political climate” is going to necessitate “additional layers of physical security.”

So if Trump and Republicans don’t intend to harm anyone then why do we need additional physical layers of security to protect Pelosi?

Re: the bolded. Ever stop to think that the political climate also refers to attitudes of Democrats?
You do realize that Republicans on the Hill face threats as well?

The only Republicans getting death threats are the Republicans deemed RINOs by MAGA. MAGA are really like terrorists.

Evidence proves this statement false. Sorry, pal.

What do you mean, sweetie-babe?

Here, honey babe.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I thought Pelosi went to take a bathroom break and called from there? Depape could hear him? Is this Depape's account? I'm honestly confused here.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Death threats have been common throughout American history. That’s background noise compared to organized and well funded efforts to threaten elected officials.

Ignorant comment. The number has skyrocketed lately. Stop denying there is a problem! That would be a great first step. But conservatives can only encourage the violence.

Anonymous wrote: