Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They must think we’re all a bunch of brainwashed idiot groupthinkers to buy into this narrative they’re pushing. It’s quite insulting.

When are we going to find out who all the mysterious and creepy out of state cars belonged to that allegedly visited the kid’s house a week before this happened? Kind of glossing over that, aren’t they.

What is MAGA’s explanation for this?

My thoughts are it’s the individuals, or more likely the associates of the individuals, whose accounts had been hacked. They probably found out, reached out to Tyler pretending to be connected to Kirk.

Anonymous wrote:Is the general thought now that this guy shot Kirk because he (Kirk) "wasn't right-wing enough"? That's probably an oversimplification, but is that the general idea? i.e., that shooter was a far-right type who found Kirk to be insufficiently right-wing?

This is my belief based on messages from Nick Fuentes and Laura Loomer and others to the right of Kirk. There are others who believe the shooter went more liberal and thus shot Kirk 'from the left" perspective, while others believe it was not a political thing, but rather a disaffected/attention thing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They must think we’re all a bunch of brainwashed idiot groupthinkers to buy into this narrative they’re pushing. It’s quite insulting.

When are we going to find out who all the mysterious and creepy out of state cars belonged to that allegedly visited the kid’s house a week before this happened? Kind of glossing over that, aren’t they.

What is MAGA’s explanation for this?

Anonymous wrote:He's confessed. It's over. Take your L and move on.

He hasn’t confessed in person, there is an online confession.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tyler Robinson is such a perfect metaphor for America.

Both were once a smart, promising kid with a bright future. Maybe a little bit too in love with guns. Then they dropped out of the world, went down an internet rabbit hole, and became deranged.

Ok keep on perpetuating this utter ridiculous false story.

What’s false about it?

These are the facts imo
1. MAGA conveniently making trans/gay culture a scapegoat
2. The fact that Tyler Robinson is likely not left leaning
3. Tyler and Lance were fans of Kirk
4. They were cybersecurity hackers
5. This was done by forces trying to divide America society

This was an act done by a kid who was extremely online, raised with weapons of war.
There is zero evidence that he was in a conspiracy with Lance or that they were hackers. Stop watching black mirror.

True, I feel like our response should be more focused on the role social media plays in the development of these mass shooters- it’s a common denominator, and clearly dangerous for young minds. I think we can all unite in that theme.

United? Yeah, right. Try to ban porn or merely require 18+ age verification and look at the left’s response. The left knows how destructive porn is and what a rabbit hole it is on young minds. Porn literally digitally grooms kids. You think a sweet young Mormon boy woke up one day and was suddenly into trans furries or whatever the heck? That’s 10 years of brain destroying porn on a young mind.

That's a heck of a narrative. Also, this is the proof these FBI buffoons have that he was a furry >> he once wore a furry yellow hat in an online pic. Please. My HS niece and her BF post pics together in these hats and they are not furries, nor gay.

https://www.newsweek.com/lance-twiggs-tyler-robinson-partner-social-media-2129970

He's confessed. It's over. Take your L and move on.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tyler Robinson is such a perfect metaphor for America.

Both were once a smart, promising kid with a bright future. Maybe a little bit too in love with guns. Then they dropped out of the world, went down an internet rabbit hole, and became deranged.

Ok keep on perpetuating this utter ridiculous false story.

What’s false about it?

These are the facts imo
1. MAGA conveniently making trans/gay culture a scapegoat
2. The fact that Tyler Robinson is likely not left leaning
3. Tyler and Lance were fans of Kirk
4. They were cybersecurity hackers
5. This was done by forces trying to divide America society

This was an act done by a kid who was extremely online, raised with weapons of war.
There is zero evidence that he was in a conspiracy with Lance or that they were hackers. Stop watching black mirror.

True, I feel like our response should be more focused on the role social media plays in the development of these mass shooters- it’s a common denominator, and clearly dangerous for young minds. I think we can all unite in that theme.

United? Yeah, right. Try to ban porn or merely require 18+ age verification and look at the left’s response. The left knows how destructive porn is and what a rabbit hole it is on young minds. Porn literally digitally grooms kids. You think a sweet young Mormon boy woke up one day and was suddenly into trans furries or whatever the heck? That’s 10 years of brain destroying porn on a young mind.

lol sure. So you want ICE to monitor your internet for usage for porn and non RWNJ activity? What happens next? They bust down your door because you watched a non maga approved video? I tell you what let’s put everything you read, watch and your sex habits on a public forum with your name and work place. If anyone gets offended you can be arrested.

What the f is wrong with you people. This is the right. They think because they got a participation trophy in 6th grade they have the right to enforce their f’ed beliefs on everyone else at gun point. Why do you want to impose religious law on everyone.

Rules for thee none for RWNJs. I will take the “left” any day over what you are pushing.

Is the general thought now that this guy shot Kirk because he (Kirk) "wasn't right-wing enough"? That's probably an oversimplification, but is that the general idea? i.e., that shooter was a far-right type who found Kirk to be insufficiently right-wing?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those on the right saying the left are dangerous and violent...

https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2025/09/12/is-radical-left-violence-really-on-the-rise-in-america

https://ccjs.umd.edu/feature/umd-led-study-shows-disparities-violence-among-extremist-groups

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/countering-organized-violence-in-the-united-states/

https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/the-rise-of-political-violence-in-the-united-states/

I have yet to find a study that validates that the left is mor violent than the right. To the contrary, the right is 6x-8x more violent than the left.

So stop the lying and gaslighting and certainly put a stop to what the Administration is threatening.

For goodness sake. The president was shot at…twice no less. Throw all the flawed studies you want, but surely some introspection is called for.

Are you saying the Cato institute is a liberal organization that executes flawed studies too?

https://www.cato.org/blog/politically-motivated-violence-rare-united-states

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They must think we’re all a bunch of brainwashed idiot groupthinkers to buy into this narrative they’re pushing. It’s quite insulting.

When are we going to find out who all the mysterious and creepy out of state cars belonged to that allegedly visited the kid’s house a week before this happened? Kind of glossing over that, aren’t they.

Most likely the same type of people who were involved with Oklahoma City bombing.

They were there collecting DNA samples to frame Tyler.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They must think we’re all a bunch of brainwashed idiot groupthinkers to buy into this narrative they’re pushing. It’s quite insulting.

When are we going to find out who all the mysterious and creepy out of state cars belonged to that allegedly visited the kid’s house a week before this happened? Kind of glossing over that, aren’t they.

Most likely the same type of people who were involved with Oklahoma City bombing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those on the right saying the left are dangerous and violent...

https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2025/09/12/is-radical-left-violence-really-on-the-rise-in-america

https://ccjs.umd.edu/feature/umd-led-study-shows-disparities-violence-among-extremist-groups

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/countering-organized-violence-in-the-united-states/

https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/the-rise-of-political-violence-in-the-united-states/

I have yet to find a study that validates that the left is mor violent than the right. To the contrary, the right is 6x-8x more violent than the left.

So stop the lying and gaslighting and certainly put a stop to what the Administration is threatening.

For goodness sake. The president was shot at…twice no less. Throw all the flawed studies you want, but surely some introspection is called for.

The first shooting in Pennsylvania, the shooter had no ideology. He seemed like a loner and a troubled kid and was looking for fame. I don’t know anything about the second shooting.

Reagan was shot by someone who was trying to get attention of Jody Foster.

Assassinations often don’t have any ideology. The shooters are just looking for notoriety.

The Butler shooter was mad about Epstein.

lol! Before the election. If you are going to claim something like that you need to cite your source. No evidence on that.

The Epstein connection seems to have been based on a fake insta post.

There is still no know motive but it is known that the shooter was a conservative.

The Trump shooter had a list of events to target that included a Biden rally and the Democratic National Convention, the Trump rally was just first and closest.

Yep, these kids radicalized online don’t have a straight ideology. I know we want to subscribe political leanings to them, but we’ll find out probably with this Robinson the same thing. The through line: extreme online, nihilistic, and easy access to guns.

I wonder how soon before we find out assets, agents and intel spooks made up over half of this naive and lost kid’s orbit.

He was neither lost nor naive, well possibly a little naive as he was framed for murder. Could have been on the spectrum which makes this even more pathetic. He was an asset to Charlie Kirk.

Who r u talking about?

Tyler was retrieving intel for Kirk imo.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tyler Robinson is such a perfect metaphor for America.

Both were once a smart, promising kid with a bright future. Maybe a little bit too in love with guns. Then they dropped out of the world, went down an internet rabbit hole, and became deranged.

Ok keep on perpetuating this utter ridiculous false story.

What’s false about it?

These are the facts imo
1. MAGA conveniently making trans/gay culture a scapegoat
2. The fact that Tyler Robinson is likely not left leaning
3. Tyler and Lance were fans of Kirk
4. They were cybersecurity hackers
5. This was done by forces trying to divide America society

This was an act done by a kid who was extremely online, raised with weapons of war.
There is zero evidence that he was in a conspiracy with Lance or that they were hackers. Stop watching black mirror.

True, I feel like our response should be more focused on the role social media plays in the development of these mass shooters- it’s a common denominator, and clearly dangerous for young minds. I think we can all unite in that theme.

United? Yeah, right. Try to ban porn or merely require 18+ age verification and look at the left’s response. The left knows how destructive porn is and what a rabbit hole it is on young minds. Porn literally digitally grooms kids. You think a sweet young Mormon boy woke up one day and was suddenly into trans furries or whatever the heck? That’s 10 years of brain destroying porn on a young mind.

Nine of the top ten porn viewing states are also MAGA states. I posted that about 350 pages ago in this thread.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those on the right saying the left are dangerous and violent...

https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2025/09/12/is-radical-left-violence-really-on-the-rise-in-america

https://ccjs.umd.edu/feature/umd-led-study-shows-disparities-violence-among-extremist-groups

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/countering-organized-violence-in-the-united-states/

https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/the-rise-of-political-violence-in-the-united-states/

I have yet to find a study that validates that the left is mor violent than the right. To the contrary, the right is 6x-8x more violent than the left.

So stop the lying and gaslighting and certainly put a stop to what the Administration is threatening.

For goodness sake. The president was shot at…twice no less. Throw all the flawed studies you want, but surely some introspection is called for.

The first shooting in Pennsylvania, the shooter had no ideology. He seemed like a loner and a troubled kid and was looking for fame. I don’t know anything about the second shooting.

Reagan was shot by someone who was trying to get attention of Jody Foster.

Assassinations often don’t have any ideology. The shooters are just looking for notoriety.

The Butler shooter was mad about Epstein.

lol! Before the election. If you are going to claim something like that you need to cite your source. No evidence on that.

The Epstein connection seems to have been based on a fake insta post.

There is still no know motive but it is known that the shooter was a conservative.

The Trump shooter had a list of events to target that included a Biden rally and the Democratic National Convention, the Trump rally was just first and closest.

Yep, these kids radicalized online don’t have a straight ideology. I know we want to subscribe political leanings to them, but we’ll find out probably with this Robinson the same thing. The through line: extreme online, nihilistic, and easy access to guns.

I wonder how soon before we find out assets, agents and intel spooks made up over half of this naive and lost kid’s orbit.

He was neither lost nor naive, well possibly a little naive as he was framed for murder. Could have been on the spectrum which makes this even more pathetic. He was an asset to Charlie Kirk.

Who r u talking about?

Oh Tyler Robinson, he was framed for the murder of Kirk.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tyler Robinson is such a perfect metaphor for America.

Both were once a smart, promising kid with a bright future. Maybe a little bit too in love with guns. Then they dropped out of the world, went down an internet rabbit hole, and became deranged.

Ok keep on perpetuating this utter ridiculous false story.

What’s false about it?

These are the facts imo
1. MAGA conveniently making trans/gay culture a scapegoat
2. The fact that Tyler Robinson is likely not left leaning
3. Tyler and Lance were fans of Kirk
4. They were cybersecurity hackers
5. This was done by forces trying to divide America society

This was an act done by a kid who was extremely online, raised with weapons of war.
There is zero evidence that he was in a conspiracy with Lance or that they were hackers. Stop watching black mirror.

True, I feel like our response should be more focused on the role social media plays in the development of these mass shooters- it’s a common denominator, and clearly dangerous for young minds. I think we can all unite in that theme.

Yes, and it’s a big serious theme.

Indeed. Our society needs a reckoning, yet instead we have to deal with the growing Trump threat. We have no functional national leadership.